We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Airpods
Options
Comments
-
Brydson86 said:Jumblebumble said:Brydson86 said:Any tips on replying to Sky? I quoted the consumer rights act and they are still refusing to fix the problem. They still want me to send them back for a refund on the remaining contract.
They sold you a pair of matched airpods you damaged /lost one of them which is not covered under the consumer rights act.
I am not clear what outcome you want
In any case they might take the uncharitable view that the Apple supplied one might be faulty but that Apple are simply putting the blame on the other one.
I want working airpods but now I'm in-between both Sky and Apple.
Are Sky not breaking the consumer rights act by not agreeing to repair the device?Nope.Repair, replace or refund, whichever is most cost effective.0 -
If a repair cost is unreasonable then Sky have the right to refuse a repair.
Since Sky do not stock them anymore they cannot replace and I doubt Sky have any engineers to repair airpods , so refund is the option. In your case that is cancelling the remaining contract to pay.
You no longer have working airpods but you are not required to pay the rest of you contract.
If you had bought the airpods and was in the same position you would be entitled to a refund less the use you have had so you wouldn't get a full refund, only a part refund- similar to Sjy cancelling the contract. but your contract is for a pair of airpods so you need to return a pair of airpods.
But, if Apple are saying there is nothing wrong with the new one and the problem is with the old one, they are not going to replace/refund.
You really do not have any other option than Sky's offer and to source a new pair of airpods0 -
AirPods don’t get repaired anyway. They’re always replaced.Edited to add:
Unless it’s the AirPods Max. They’re the only model that will be repaired. Not economical to repair the other models.0 -
Brydson86 said:born_again said:Brydson86 said:born_again said:Brydson86 said:Any tips on replying to Sky? I quoted the consumer rights act and they are still refusing to fix the problem. They still want me to send them back for a refund on the remaining contract.
Now you are stuck. Don't think Consumer Rights can help you hear (pun intended) given your action on the previous issue. It's not Sky's fault you bought a new one. So they do not owe you for that.
Do you still have the old one you replaced? If you do then send that back & keep the one you bought.
Sky also aren't aware that I have bought a new pod.
If the monthly cost is going to total more than £80, then you are in profit.
If not, not much you can do. As they want a pir of airpods back to cancel the contract.
MSE says take the money.👍Life in the slow lane0 -
Ergates said:Brydson86 said:Ergates said:Ergates said:Brydson86 said:Ergates said:
[Edit: This is what the OP originally said - "... These have developed a fault after I bought a new airpod as I dropped it. Since the replacement they no longer work. I have been to Apple and they said that I should go to Sky...". To me that reads that the OP bought the replacement before going to Apple]
If that's the case (and I can't tell if it is or not because the story is so muddled and keeps on changing) then I don't see what involvement Sky Apple have with this at all.1 -
I can't see how @Brydson86 has any remedy against Sky either(?).
He broke one of the airpods and decided himself to buy a replacement. The fact that the replacement doesn't work with the remaining original airpod is not Sky's fault. The OP shouldn't have broken one of the originals.
And as per my previous post it's not clear to me that Apple have any liability either as I read the OP to be saying that they bought the replacement airpod before they ever approached Apple. (Although I freely admit I can't follow the chain of events as the OP describes them...)
[Edit: so if I were the OP I think I'd accept whatever Sky are offering as I don't think they're legally obliged to offer anything at all]0 -
Okell said:Ergates said:Brydson86 said:Ergates said:Ergates said:Brydson86 said:Ergates said:
[Edit: This is what the OP originally said - "... These have developed a fault after I bought a new airpod as I dropped it. Since the replacement they no longer work. I have been to Apple and they said that I should go to Sky...". To me that reads that the OP bought the replacement before going to Apple]
If that's the case (and I can't tell if it is or not because the story is so muddled and keeps on changing) then I don't see what involvement Sky Apple have with this at all.
Then went back to Apple to see if they could help iwth the pairing and they've said "Nope"0 -
Brydson86 said:born_again said:Brydson86 said:born_again said:Brydson86 said:Any tips on replying to Sky? I quoted the consumer rights act and they are still refusing to fix the problem. They still want me to send them back for a refund on the remaining contract.
Now you are stuck. Don't think Consumer Rights can help you hear (pun intended) given your action on the previous issue. It's not Sky's fault you bought a new one. So they do not owe you for that.
Do you still have the old one you replaced? If you do then send that back & keep the one you bought.
Sky also aren't aware that I have bought a new pod.
If the monthly cost is going to total more than £80, then you are in profit.
If not, not much you can do. As they want a pir of airpods back to cancel the contract.
That is the result of breaking one of them.
There is no way round it, no matter how many ways you ask.
What Sky are offering is the only option you have.0 -
Ergates said:Okell said:Ergates said:Brydson86 said:Ergates said:Ergates said:Brydson86 said:Ergates said:
[Edit: This is what the OP originally said - "... These have developed a fault after I bought a new airpod as I dropped it. Since the replacement they no longer work. I have been to Apple and they said that I should go to Sky...". To me that reads that the OP bought the replacement before going to Apple]
If that's the case (and I can't tell if it is or not because the story is so muddled and keeps on changing) then I don't see what involvement Sky Apple have with this at all.
Then went back to Apple to see if they could help iwth the pairing and they've said "Nope"
But what he actually posted was: "... These have developed a fault after I bought a new airpod as I dropped it. Since the replacement they no longer work. I have been to Apple and they said that I should go to Sky... "
To me - because of the order in which he has put events - that clearly says that he raised the issue with Apple only after he had decided to buy a replacement, had done so, and found they didn't work.
Perhaps he really meant to say: "I dropped one of my airpods and it broke. I went to my nearby Apple store and they advised me that I could simply buy one new airpod and that it would be no problem at all to pair it with my remaining original airpod so that they would both work together as before. On that basis I decided to buy a new replacement airpod".
But he didn't say that so we don't know if that is what has happened or not...
I'm amazed at the inability of so many posters who come here looking for help to give a simple, complete and accurate chronological account of events.3
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards