

They go on to say that you have fourteen days to pay up.
We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Didn’t think of this! ThankyouCoupon-mad said:You could say it was reversed because the parking operator is a third party and not the Authority. This cannot be right in a byelaws case where monies for (alleged) offences go to the public purse.
Ask who the creditor is and whether monies paid eventually go to the relevant Authority, or not. Ask for a copy of the Byelaws.
there are NO next steps at the momentcaspre12 said:Wow never realised how many holes in the letter there is!KeithP said:So CPS Midland Ltd have sent you a letter claiming to have been instructed to take action against you but they have failed to state who has instructed them.
But they do state...Note their spelling of the word Claimant.
They go on to say that you have fourteen days to pay up.
Further ramblings mention the Practice Direction on Pre-Action conduct (the PDPAC).
One can only assume they are referring to the...Practice Direction – Pre-Action Conduct and Protocols
The second paragraph of the Introduction in that PDPAC states...2. This Practice Direction applies to disputes where no pre-action protocol approved by the Master of the Rolls applies. A person who knowingly makes a false statement in a pre-action protocol letter or other document prepared in anticipation of legal proceedings may be subject to proceedings for contempt of court.They should be worried by the second sentence there.
Perhaps they don't know about the Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims.
That protocol gives the victim thirty days to pay.So what should my next steps be?