DCBL Final Reminder / PCN from Euro Car Parks Limited / Astle Retail Park.

Le_Kirk

NewAppeal34 said:

sending this in today. By searching the forum I found DQ.CNBC@justice.gov.uk. I guess that's the correct email address to use.

Correct, it is on the template defence thread.

Coupon-mad

Please stick to the first 12 steps. Don't search the forum, no need.

Then carry on following the first 12 steps in the Template Defence thread so that you don't need to ask about the laughable Mediation phone call. It is all already covered there.

We hope that we are only needed again by Defendants at WS & evidence stage next year. The 'first 12 steps' advice saves us all time.

See you in a few months time.

NewAppeal34

Hi All,

To keep you updated, I just had my 5 minutes mediation call. They Lady was very friendly, however as many before me pointed out she said that when not accepting settlements, the costs could rise in court and that there is always the risk of loosing if no satisfactory evidence was to be presented. Also that if I at least negotiate, the judge would take that into consideration as well. 

Anyways, I now offered 0£ and the call was ended. I now just hope that my standard defence without any signage etc. is enough for them to not wanting to waste their time and to discontinue at the next stage.

Many thanks

Coupon-mad

NewAppeal34 said:

Hi All,

To keep you updated, I just had my 5 minutes mediation call.

The Lady was very friendly, however as many before me pointed out she said that when not accepting settlements, the costs could rise in court and that there is always the risk of losing if no satisfactory evidence was to be presented. Also that if I at least negotiate, the judge would take that into consideration as well. 

She lied. This is so wrong.

All of those statements about costs risk (and about the Judge considering whether a D offered money or not - this conversation is NOT known by the Judge and offers are not compulsory) are wrong in a parking case.

Please put in a formal complaint with the Mediation Service because they are misleading Defendants against scam Parking Operator roboclaims that the court service and mediators should be ashamed to support and lie about. Explain what she said and why she is wrong and this is misleading 'parking scam' victims.

NewAppeal34

Hi guys,

I have now received the below asking the claimant to submit an amended particulars of claim. Any advice at this stage? In my initial defence I didn't include details about signage either, but went for the standard defence. 

Coupon-mad

NewAppeal34 said:

Hi guys,

I have now received the below asking the claimant to submit an amended particulars of claim. Any advice at this stage? In my initial defence I didn't include details about signage either, but went for the standard defence. 

That order is one for @Le_Kirk to see!

The Court isn't impressed with the claim and sometimes this causes PPCs to give up. However, I expect DCB Legal will comply, then you must amend your defence or tell the court that your existing defence stands.

Show us the amended POC when that arrives.

Le_Kirk

'Tis done!  New .pdf, same old link!   Judgments

Coupon-mad

Le_Kirk said:

'Tis done!  New .pdf, same old link!   Judgments

Thanks! Is the link in your dedicated thread the same as this one?

Le_Kirk

Coupon-mad said:

Le_Kirk said:

'Tis done!  New .pdf, same old link!   Judgments

Thanks! Is the link in your dedicated thread the same as this one?

Well it was when I tried it but not now, I hate Dropbox, I'll try and fix it. Did I mention I hate Dropbox? 

Judgments is now correct! Did I say I hate Dropbox? Since I edited it, all instances on the last few posts are correct! Did I say...............

NewAppeal34

Hi All,

please find the amended POC attached. 

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/wbb3rrfg0y9sg9rpoo7a1/DCB-Legal_Amended-POC.pdf?rlkey=jj4li4c65l8wk1d9bhmb7g5td&st=cu2w775j&dl=0

Many thanks