We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Who has not done their job properly, my conveyancer, purchasers solicitor or the Local Authority?
Options
Comments
-
lincroft1710 said:user1977 said:Well, for starters are you now satisfied that there was such a grant provided under those conditions? If so then I expect the estate is liable.
Yes, it would have been helpful to everyone if the buyer (via their solicitors) had discovered the issue, but I don't think anybody owes you a duty to have done so. This is stuff deemed to be within your knowledge.
And as between the estate and the council, I don't see why the estate wouldn't still be liable.1 -
user1977 said:lincroft1710 said:user1977 said:Well, for starters are you now satisfied that there was such a grant provided under those conditions? If so then I expect the estate is liable.
Yes, it would have been helpful to everyone if the buyer (via their solicitors) had discovered the issue, but I don't think anybody owes you a duty to have done so. This is stuff deemed to be within your knowledge.
And as between the estate and the council, I don't see why the estate wouldn't still be liable.
If you are querying your Council Tax band would you please state whether you are in England, Scotland or Wales1 -
GTG said:I sold a flat (exchanged contracts) in March 2022 as part of the work involved in the administration of an estate. I completed the administration of the estate in September 2022. Last week I received an email from the proprietor of the conveyancing firm I used for the sale of the flat. It was to tell me that the gentleman that I sold it to was selling it on and his purchaser's solicitor had done a local land search which revealed that there is a "Notification of approval of disabled facilities grant" which was registered in November 2014 and some of the grant would be repayable if the property is sold within 10 years. The deceased's paper work keeping was not his strong point so I acquired an incomplete set of records and I was not aware of the grant when doing the administration. The current owner/seller has asked my conveyancer to get it sorted and the conveyancer has asked for my comments. I paid the local authority who are the freeholders and manage the building for a leasehold pack which was sent to the conveyancer during the conveyancing process.
Anyone got any advice as to the best way to proceed with this please?
But it sounds to me like the questions you should be asking are:
1. As the executor, is the estate liable (in general terms) to pay a grant back even in circumstances where the person who received the grant died before the 10 years were up?
2. If so, does the fact that the property has been sold mean that the liability to discharge the grant has now passed to the current owner? Or does the liability remain with the estate because the disposal to the current owner happened within 10 years?
3. If there is liability for you as the executor to pay this, how would/should/could you have known about this? And what can you now do about it?
4 -
lincroft1710 said:user1977 said:lincroft1710 said:user1977 said:Well, for starters are you now satisfied that there was such a grant provided under those conditions? If so then I expect the estate is liable.
Yes, it would have been helpful to everyone if the buyer (via their solicitors) had discovered the issue, but I don't think anybody owes you a duty to have done so. This is stuff deemed to be within your knowledge.
And as between the estate and the council, I don't see why the estate wouldn't still be liable.3 -
GTG said:It was to tell me that the gentleman that I sold it to was selling it on and his purchaser's solicitor had done a local land search which revealed that there is a "Notification of approval of disabled facilities grant" which was registered in November 2014 and some of the grant would be repayable if the property is sold within 10 years.
I'd merely state that you've no knowledge of the matter.1 -
Hoenir said:GTG said:It was to tell me that the gentleman that I sold it to was selling it on and his purchaser's solicitor had done a local land search which revealed that there is a "Notification of approval of disabled facilities grant" which was registered in November 2014 and some of the grant would be repayable if the property is sold within 10 years.
I'd merely state that you've no knowledge of the matter.
I also think the Estate remains liable for the charge, despite the OP being unaware of it until now.
If the OPs conveyance agrees then I would be asking the first purchaser's solicitors to at the very least cover the OPs legal and incidental costs incurred to remove the charge.2 -
Tiglet2 said:When you were selling the property, was there a charge on the registered title regarding the disabilities grant? Some local authorities will place a charge against the property, that will have to be re-paid, if the disabled person moves out and sells the adapted property a few years after the works have been completed.
I don't know about HMLR but obviously at the local authority land registry as the new purchaser's solicitor found it.
It is very much buyer beware. When a buyer and their solicitor are purchasing a property, it is their responsibility to make enquiries and do any due diligence necessary to ensure that they are buying a good and marketable title. It would fall upon them to raise enquiries of your solicitor/you/the council in order that the charge could be removed, before the new owner could be registered.
I thought it was a bit of a joint effort between the vendor's and purchaser's conveyancers to ensure there will not be any disputed after the sale.
As you were selling as Administrator, you wouldn't be expected to know anything much about the property. Presumably the property was being sold with "limited title"?
That is an interesting angle on this. I do not have a copy of the contract of sale I signed (does anyone ask to look at these?) I took it in good faith that the conveyancer was acting to protect my interests so would expect that to be in the contract. Is that correct?
First of all, I would check the paperwork when you sold to see if the charge is noted on the title. If it is, then I would pass it back to the purchaser's solicitor via your solicitor to say that you were not aware of the charge as you were selling as Administrator with limited title guarantee and that they should have dealt with this during the purchase.
Would my conveyancer have provided me with copies of the title register during the conveyancing process? Also, I am guessing I need to ask for a copy of the contract of sale to see if the conveyancer has done the right thing for me as an Administrator and included a limited guarantee clause? Is that correct?
The monies owed to the council will need to be repaid though.
Yes, the deceased was definitely awarded the grant. Since my original post one of the beneficiaries (one of the sons of the deceased) has found some of the deceased's paperwork relating to one off works by the management company i.e. the local authority and the Notice of Approval of the Grant. They were in the back of an old photo album so not in my possession when doing the administration.
{Signature removed by Forum Team - if you are not sure why we have removed your signature please contact the Forum Team}
0 -
If the paperwork relating to the grant has now been found, how much have been owed to the council at the time of the sale of the property?If you are querying your Council Tax band would you please state whether you are in England, Scotland or Wales0
-
lincroft1710 said:If the paperwork relating to the grant has now been found, how much have been owed to the council at the time of the sale of the property?
{Signature removed by Forum Team - if you are not sure why we have removed your signature please contact the Forum Team}
0 -
GTG said:A copy of the signed application has not been found but there is now no doubt in my mind that the deceased benefited from the grant. The notice makes it clear that the first £5,000 of the grant is excluded but all monies granted above that up to a maximum of £10,000 is repayable if the property is sold within 10 years of the certified date regardless of when, if that occurs within the 10 years. It does not define the certified date but there is an expiry date for exercising the right to the grant by having the work carried out within 12 months of approval. I assume that is also applied to the repayment terms.
These "claw back" agreements are all around the grant being awarded and ensuring the intended individual benefits, not the intended individual receiving the grant and then selling immediately to pocket the value of the enhancement. In this case, clearly, the intended individual did benefit and never (intentionally) sold up to pocket the gain. It may be that there is a clause that the "claw back" dies with the death of the individual.
It is quite important to establish the dates that the grant was awarded, the date the "claw back" period started and then the date of sale. It is a "claw back" of £10k over ten years. That probably reduces on a straight line basis so, if the period was 5 years before the death, that would mean £5k remains to be paid back, not the full £10k.
It is even possible that the full "claw back" period expired before the death and the charge was simply never removed from the property even though having no remaining value.2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards