We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
The AA
Comments
-
Jam43 said:Alderbank said:It would be useful to tell us what was wrong with the car. That is relevant.
From what you have said so far your complaint could equally be about the garage - that they sensed that you do not know much about cars and massively overcharged you for a minor repair, blaming it on bad advice from the AA technician.
Who are CS and FO?
If I am correct (??) then your only recourse would be the small claims court.1 -
Jam43 said:Apparently a hole in an oil pipe. Caused smoke. As not at garage for a week, oil got in the turbo. I trust my garage 1000%. CS is the conciliation services and FO is financial ombudsmanJam43 said:
We both specifically asked if ok to drive and if need to go in straight away. He said it was fine.
So the AA person told you had a hole in an oil pipe, and therefore the leaking oil was smoking, but it was OK to continue to drive it?
You will need a report from the garage saying that the hole in the oil pipe as diagnosed by the AA meant that the car was NOT OK to drive, and should have been towed to the nearest garage.
You will also need the garage report to state that the damage was ONLY caused due to driving away after you'd stopped and called them, and was not present at the point of the AA arriving.
The problem you have is your interpretation of "fine" to drive. I would have taken this to mean "fine" to drive it to the nearest garage, not drive another 50 miles!! So the question is... would driving to the nearest garage still have caused this damage?Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')
No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)0 -
Undervalued said:Jam43 said:Alderbank said:It would be useful to tell us what was wrong with the car. That is relevant.
From what you have said so far your complaint could equally be about the garage - that they sensed that you do not know much about cars and massively overcharged you for a minor repair, blaming it on bad advice from the AA technician.
Who are CS and FO?
They say:
AA Financial Services Limited acts as a credit intermediary and introduces customers to Bank of Ireland (UK) plc as its exclusive loans provider. AA Financial Services Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.
However the guys in financial services aren't the ones who come out to fix your car and I don't think the financial ombudsman is much use with spanners either.
Well done though for getting him out to help so early in the process.0 -
Jam43 said:Aylesbury_Duck said:Jam43 said:Aylesbury_Duck said:Jam43 said:Looking for some advice - after a breakdown and following the engineers advice to - book in when can - our car broke down the next week and cost us £800 to repair. (We were booked to take car to the garage the following week) This bill was lot more than expected when told just a hole in a pipe - not fixed on site. I have contacted the AA regarding this issue. The engineers report stated he told us to book the car in asap.
We both specifically asked if ok to drive and if need to go in straight away. He said it was fine.
Our garage said the leak from the pipe caused the damage.
I have also contacted the CS and FO. The FO are hopefully still helping. I feel very fogged off by the AA and that they think I will eventually go away. They won't say if they have any recording to confirm what was said on site.
Any one have any advise please. Do I have a case? Is there any more I can do? I know its not thousand of pounds, but it was lot to us.
Unfortunately, whether it was you or the garage (or both) that was too busy to get it seen to sooner, the fact remains that you chose to drive a car with a known fault. The pragmatic thing to do was to leave it at home until you could drive it (slowly) directly to the garage as soon as they were able to take it in.0 -
Jam43 said:Brie said:"We weren't able to get the car in the gargae any sooner as busy. "
You were busy or the garage was busy? Was leaving the car at home and not using it an option?1 -
pinkshoes said:Jam43 said:Apparently a hole in an oil pipe. Caused smoke. As not at garage for a week, oil got in the turbo. I trust my garage 1000%. CS is the conciliation services and FO is financial ombudsmanJam43 said:
We both specifically asked if ok to drive and if need to go in straight away. He said it was fine.
So the AA person told you had a hole in an oil pipe, and therefore the leaking oil was smoking, but it was OK to continue to drive it?
You will need a report from the garage saying that the hole in the oil pipe as diagnosed by the AA meant that the car was NOT OK to drive, and should have been towed to the nearest garage.
You will also need the garage report to state that the damage was ONLY caused due to driving away after you'd stopped and called them, and was not present at the point of the AA arriving.
The problem you have is your interpretation of "fine" to drive. I would have taken this to mean "fine" to drive it to the nearest garage, not drive another 50 miles!! So the question is... would driving to the nearest garage still have caused this damage?0 -
So hole in oil pipe, drove up to 50 miles. Can we take it that it was still smoking while you drove it for a week?
Was oil level checked at any point?
Life in the slow lane2 -
If the AA had told you it was not okay to drive it how would you have got to work for the two weeks before the garage could deal with it?0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.4K Life & Family
- 255.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards