We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
Are there any glaringly obvious bits I have missed or not gone to town on?
Comments
The operator did not provide me with the relevant documents at the time the NTH was sent. These documents included were only for the case file, pg 13-18.
There appears to be some ‘misinterpretation’ of my appeal by the operator in the fact they think I admitted I was driving the vehicle.
“The appellant has confirmed that they were driving when contravention occurred and the breach of terms and conditions not adhered to. “
As you can see further on in their evidence I have not stated who was driving the vehicle at any point in my appeal
The operator has provided full date stamped photographs for the case file of the vehicle, but the images on the NTH are not compliant with Section 21.5a of the BPA Code of Practice. They have been altered and cropped to fit on the NTH, especially apparent on the colour image of the numberplate.
The images provided showing the parking terms are ‘zoomed’ in images and the writing of the £100 fine is tiny and written in smaller print. There is no official time stamp on the picture provided on pg24 and there is nothing to show how close the car was to the sign when parked.
PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland). CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says: Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD
