UK CPM, Gladstones/Empira CCJ success

Mana2019

Coupon-mad said:

It's only going to be Gladstones.

I wouldn't have said this otherwise.

Is there a GF in the claim number?

I can confirm there is a GF in the case number.  X2GF714X

Coupon-mad

Well like I said it's 100% a Gladstones claim. GF is Gladstones.  We knew this already (because of Empira's involvement).

Mana2019

Coupon-mad said:

Well like I said it's 100% a Gladstones claim. GF is Gladstones.  We knew this already (because of Empira's involvement).

So now that I have the claim number, I can now move forward and write a N244 form?

Mana2019

Hit a stumble block. While I have the claim number, I do not have the Claimant's name. It's probably UKCPM because they are the only ones I have problems with, but I don't know if that is 100% accurate.

KeithP

Remember last time you rang the CNBC they told you they couldn't help without the Claim Number?

You now have the Claim Number...

And while you are talking, ask them to email you a copy of the Particulars of Claim.

Mana2019

KeithP said:

Remember last time you rang the CNBC they told you they couldn't help without the Claim Number?

You now have the Claim Number...

And while you are talking, ask them to email you a copy of the Particulars of Claim.

Spoken to them and I can 100% confirm UK CAR PARK MANAGEMENT LIMITED (UKCPM) was the claimant.

Also asked for the Particulars of claim and will be sent to my mailbox within 10 minutes.

I can now resume filling in the form and will keep you all updated.

Mana2019

KeithP said:

And while you are talking, ask them to email you a copy of the Particulars of Claim.

It's here:

Claimant:  UK CAR PARK MANAGEMENT LIMITED

Claimant solicitor:  GLADSTONES SOLICITORS LIMITED (7372)

Telephone: 0333 0230 049

Reference:  [REFNUMBER]/UK CAR PARK

 

Judgment amount: £ 513.73

 

Particulars of claim:  THE CLAIM IS FOR THE SUM OF £362.71          DUE BY THE DEFENDANT UNDER AN AGREEMENT      REGULATED BY THE CONSUMER CREDIT ACT 1974    FOR A SHOP DIRECT                            ACCOUNT WITH AN ACCOUNT REFERENCE OF         [REF]                                     THE DEFENDANT FAILED TO MAINTAIN CONTRACTUAL PAYMENTS REQUIRED BY THE AGREEMENT AND A     DEFAULT NOTICE WAS SERVED UNDER S.87(1) OF   THE CONSUMER CREDIT ACT 1974 WHICH HAS NOT   BEEN COMPLIED WITH.                          THE DEBT WAS LEGALLY ASSIGNED TO THE         CLAIMANT ON 17-12-18, NOTICE OF              WHICH HAS BEEN GIVEN TO THE DEFENDANT.       THE CLAIM INCLUDES STATUTORY INTEREST UNDER  S.69 OF THE COUNTY COURTS ACT 1984 AT A RATE OF 8% PER ANNUM FROM THE DATE OF ASSIGNMENT  TO THE DATE OF ISSUE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS IN THE SUM OF £29.02                            THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS THE SUM OF £391.73  

==

EDIT (UPDATE): Received another e-mail from CNBC stating: "Sorry the Judgment amount is incorrect. The right for the judgment is for £ 300.51."

Coupon-mad

I'm sorry what?

That CANNOT BE THE RIGHT POC.

Mana2019

Coupon-mad said:

I'm sorry what?

That CANNOT BE THE RIGHT POC.

You  just missed the edit.

Received another e-mail from CNBC stating: "Sorry the Judgment amount is incorrect. The right for the judgment is for £ 300.51."

Fruitcake

... but the PoC are nothing to do with a parking charge. They are something to do with failing to make regular payments towards what appears to be a hire purchase agreement. Did you buy an item, set up a payment plan, then fail to make all the payments, because that's what those PoC look like they are for.

Do you/did you have a Very/Shop Direct account that you defaulted on?