PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING
Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.Loft conversion/lease issue

zakizzy25
Forumite Posts: 31
Forumite


Hi
I want to buy a top floor house conversion my problem seems to be quite an issue
this loft conversion was done over 20 years ago I have seen the building reg and permission to build
Which was sent to my solicitor
the lease says the roof of the building together with the structure Therof so far as the same constitutes the roof of the flat
there is no other mention in the lease as to the loft
the conversion was done many years after this lease was made
my question is should there have been a new lease at the time of the conversion
Or at least an amendment to the lease?
and is this sufficient to show I own the loft?
this is now with my mortgage lender and I fear this information is ambiguous to say the least
hope some wise sole here will enlighten me please
I want to buy a top floor house conversion my problem seems to be quite an issue
this loft conversion was done over 20 years ago I have seen the building reg and permission to build
Which was sent to my solicitor
the lease says the roof of the building together with the structure Therof so far as the same constitutes the roof of the flat
there is no other mention in the lease as to the loft
the conversion was done many years after this lease was made
my question is should there have been a new lease at the time of the conversion
Or at least an amendment to the lease?
and is this sufficient to show I own the loft?
this is now with my mortgage lender and I fear this information is ambiguous to say the least
hope some wise sole here will enlighten me please
0
Comments
-
If the lease you've been sent does not accurately and fully identify the parts of the building that you believe you should, or wish to, own, then clearly you should not buy that lease.
Make clear to your solicitor the discrepancy between what you viewed and wish to buy, and the lease you've been sent.
Remember, your solicitor has not visited the building so has no idea of any of this unless you tell him!
Have you also seen the Land Registry leasehold title? And how may titles are listed at the LR for that building? There should usually be 1 freehold title, and one leasehold for each flat. From your descripting it sounds like there were originally 2 flats yes? Then a 3rd (which you wish to buy) was added, so there should be 3 leasehold titles, plus the freehold, logged with the LR. Correct?
You can check at the LR - I'd advise buying the titles (£3 each) and plans (£3 each) for all the leaseholds and the freehold.to give you a full picture.
https://search-property-information.service.gov.uk/?_ga=2.227252893.1011285419.1624257816-2123334908.1623227908
0 -
You do not seem to have any proof that the loft space was demised to the flat or that whoever ordered the conversion had the freeholders permission to do so. A lot depends on whether it is simply a house divided into two flats with you and downstairs neighbour owning joint freehold in which case you can agree new leases and leaseholder responsibilities between you or whether this flat forms part of a larger block with multiple leaseholders either with or without shares of freehold.1
-
Hi it was originally one big house converted into 2 flats with a share of the freehold
the top flat is the one I want to buy and there lies the problem the loft conversion was done in 1989
and the lease only mentioned that the top flat owns the roof no mention of the loft conversion all there is
Concerning this loft conversion is when it was applied for and approved
why are these things so complicated0 -
Surely your solicitor will advise you if everything is in order or not. If it's not in order they should tell you what's is needed. Have you asked the solicitor acting for you ?0
-
Hi
yes as he seems confident that it’s sufficient this is the 1st time I have decided to move in over 20 years and just wanted to downsize
I trust my solicitor but still can’t help feeling there should be something more substantial than what I have0 -
You tell us there are documents that show:
* The roof & it's structure are part of the top flat.....so reasonable to assume that includes the loft space.
* Permission for conversion was granted.
* Building Regs approved.
* You own a share of the freehold.
* Your solicitor says it's all ok.
I don't see a problem.......but I'm not a solicitor.
0 -
So you've explained to your solicitor that...- You are buying a first floor flat
- A leaseholder converted the loft 20 years ago, to add another storey to the flat
However, the key things that your solicitor should be checking are...- The lease states that roof space is included as part of the first floor flat
- There is written consent from the freeholder for the loft conversion (as most leases require consent for alterations).
(With many leases, if the roof was altered during the conversion, there might be issues about who is responsible for maintaining and repairing the altered roof. But it sounds like your lease makes you responsible for the roof anyway - so that might be irrelevant.)
0 -
There is a differece between 'the roof' and ownership /repairing obligations etc, and 'the roof space' which is different.0
-
subjecttocontract said:Surely your solicitor will advise you if everything is in order or not. If it's not in order they should tell you what's is needed. Have you asked the solicitor acting for you ?subjecttocontract said:
* Your solicitor says it's all ok.
I don't see a problem.......but I'm not a solicitor.
This needs to be pointed out to the Solicitor as a discrepancy between the deeds and the current reality. Absolutely pointed out in very plain terms.
If the Solicitor still says it is OK, then it probably is.
1 -
Hi thanks to everyone who has answered
the flat owner downstairs has been there for years he says he signed something years ago to do with the loft conversion
unfortunately my seller or he doesn’t have that information now
my hope is that this lease is sufficient to my mortgage lender very small mortgage but mortgage all the same my solicitor thinks it is
I will just have to wait and see
is it possible that if this is accepted by my mortgage lender can I still apply for a deed of variation /rectification in the future?
I would feel much happier with something more concrete than I have at this time
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 338.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 248.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 447.6K Spending & Discounts
- 230.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 171.1K Life & Family
- 244K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards