DCB Legal / Highview Parking - Letter of Claim - SAR advice.

B789

JavascriptGuy said:
I'm not using ChatGPT for this. I'm taking bits from various other posts on here and compiling them into something which I feel fits with my case.

Maybe but wherever you've lifted those bits from, it is fairly obvious that ChatGPT was involved at some stage. Anyway, why on earth are you responding to the LoC from the solicitor by writing to the PPC? You are responding to the LoC which has come from the PPCs solicitor. Get angry at the solicitor for being intellectually malnourished and not providing you with any detail that establishes that their client has a case.

What you have written above is still way too chummy or "wet". You really need to be writing it in the style of a snottogram.

JavascriptGuy

Coupon-mad said:

I've edited my reply a bit.

So if i remove the 'common sense...' line and knowing now that this is going to the Retail Park management, is there anything else that should be changed?

B789

JavascriptGuy said:

Coupon-mad said:

I've edited my reply a bit.

So if i remove the 'common sense...' line and knowing now that this is going to the Retail Park management, is there anything else that should be changed?

[Sigh!] You are responding to an LoC from the PPCs solicitor.

JavascriptGuy

B789 said:

JavascriptGuy said:

Coupon-mad said:

I've edited my reply a bit.

So if i remove the 'common sense...' line and knowing now that this is going to the Retail Park management, is there anything else that should be changed?

[Sigh!] You are responding to an LoC from the PPCs solicitor.

See one of the previous responses from coupon about going back to Plan A first. 

Coupon-mad

I think any complaint to a retail park that shows your wrath is good!  

1505grandad

". I'm taking bits from various other posts on here....."
".....Highview Parking and their debtors felt a £170 fine was justified?"

Hopefully this word was not used in replies to ppc?

JavascriptGuy

1505grandad said:

". I'm taking bits from various other posts on here....."
".....Highview Parking and their debtors felt a £170 fine was justified?"

Hopefully this word was not used in replies to ppc?

Does this sound ok?

I would like to know what losses to income you feel my parking may have incurred that meant Highview Parking and their debtors felt £170 was justified?

B789

JavascriptGuy said:
Does this sound ok?

I would like to know what losses to income you feel my parking may have incurred that meant Highview Parking and their debtors felt £170 was justified?

They and you know that there was no "loss". They are trying to sue you for allegedly breaching the terms of the contract you agreed to. It has nothing to do with any actual loss.

Also, do you mean Highview and their debt collectors rather than their "debtors"?

JavascriptGuy

B789 said:

JavascriptGuy said:
Does this sound ok?

I would like to know what losses to income you feel my parking may have incurred that meant Highview Parking and their debtors felt £170 was justified?

They and you know that there was no "loss". They are trying to sue you for allegedly breaching the terms of the contract you agreed to. It has nothing to do with any actual loss.

Also, do you mean Highview and their debt collectors rather than their "debtors"?

Yes, the collectors. My bad.
Should I remove that whole section?

B789

Here is a simple response to an LoC I suggested to someone a while ago. It is to DCB Legal but feel free to adapt as necessary:

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/80036315/#Comment_80036315

Or you could go guns blazing and use something like this response:

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/80112296/#Comment_80112296

Just adapt as necessary.