Two NPM/Gladstones Cases - WON AT COURT

AdamBliss

Got an email from CCBC as well. Both my defence have been filed. 

AdamBliss

Today I got 3 letters in the post and 2 emails:

1 letter from Gladstones confirming they have updated address.

2 letters from HM Courts & Tribunals Serice, confirming they have my defence for both claims, they sent copies to the claimant/claimants solicitors.

The emails are from Gladstones, they sent a copy of their N180 directions questionnaire for both claims.
They ticked Yes for 'Do you consider that this claim is suitable for determination without a hearing?' on both directions questionnaires. 

I'm currently waiting for my own Directions Questionnaires. 

AdamBliss

Coupon-mad said:

That is good and gives you ammo for your later witness statement.

I really hope more is done about these private parking companies in the future!

It already is. Please join us for the final Govt Public Consultation in July.

I am stuck on the Directions Questionnaire stage

I downaloaded DQ from govuk site and it goes up to E5 with section D only has D1

The recommended answers to fill in by bargepole goes up to D4 but no E it needs updating https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5546325/court-claim-procedure-updated-october-2016/p1

It's confusing. any advice? 

Coupon-mad

Already answered on another thread today.  This isn't very new now. Happened in 2022.

We do, of course have a thread about the new DQ questions which you can find by searching the forum and changing 'best match' to NEWEST..

KeithP

This thread - New Questions on the N180 Form - should help

There is no such thing as a new question.  

AdamBliss

Coupon-mad said:

Already answered on another thread today.  This isn't very new now. Happened in 2022.

We do, of course have a thread about the new DQ questions which you can find by searching the forum and changing 'best match' to NEWEST..

KeithP said:

This thread - New Questions on the N180 Form - should help

There is no such thing as a new question.  

Thank you guys

AdamBliss

Sent my Directions Questionnaire to CCBC and to NPM's Solicitors (Gladstones) via email, I got the automated reply acknowledging they have recieved it. 

Fruitcake

AdamBliss said:

Coupon-mad said:

Already answered on another thread today.  This isn't very new now. Happened in 2022.

We do, of course have a thread about the new DQ questions which you can find by searching the forum and changing 'best match' to NEWEST..

KeithP said:

This thread - New Questions on the N180 Form - should help

There is no such thing as a new question.  

Thank you guys

... and gals. 

AdamBliss

Got 2 replies via email from Gladstones


First:

We act for the Claimant.

Thank you for your email and apologies for the delay in returning to you. 

We note your concerns regarding the separate claims filed against you. Please note that the two referenced claims that have been issued on have continued separately due to differences contained therein such as the location that the contraventions occurred.

The Claimant's position is that the charges were issued correctly and they have a real chance of success on the facts. 

This one is funny because there was a Letter Before Court last month relating to the same location as the first CCBC claim I recieved... so if they send another CCBC claim it would then be 2 claims from the same location...

Second: 

Thank you for your email and for the attached in respect of the above matter.

The site where your vehicle has parked is a private land where permit must be displayed at all times and so no grace period apply. 

Pursuant to the photographic evidence (attached for ease of reference) your vehicle parked in front of the signage informing drivers that restrictions apply. Your vehicle parked without permit, thus you were in breach of the terms and conditions laid down for parking. Notwithstanding this, you were still parked in a manner that incurred a charge.

It is our Client's position that the charge was issued correctly and remains outstanding in the sum of £170.00.

Payment can be made via bank transfer to the account detailed as follows...

Coupon-mad

Dear Sirs, 

I've read your email.

A different location is wholly irrelevant to the doctrine of cause of action estoppel. Have you got a law degree or are you a roboclaim hotdesk minion?

Ever heard of the Overriding Objective?

Get a grip on rules of law and stop harassing and exposing victims with 'drip, drip' series of separate claims that involve the same parties, with your clients rehearsing the same tired arguments and expecting the courts to allow multiple hearings and duplicated fees.

I'll show this email exchange with my Witness Statement bundle for each and every near-duplicated claim your clients pursue against me.

Yours faithfully

YOUR NAME