We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
RBS Online Banking Refresh Coming
Comments
-
To be honest, I think the blue suits Royal Bank of Scotland more and NatWest purple, probably better to keep them as they were - although I do agree the internet banking needed updated but just font etc.0
-
pridehappy said:I do agree the internet banking needed updated but just font etc.0
-
WillPS said:stclair said:IanManc said:jackjones01 said:gary1312 said:jackjones01 said:I always thought they’d get rid of RBS in England and Wales and just have it in Scotland as a brand.
Here's a link to the RBS branch finder to help you:
https://www.rbs.co.uk/search-results/locator.html
Helpful hint: @gary1312 is right and there aren't any.
It should be noted that the plan to shrink the Royal Bank brand back to Scotland has been in the air for years - the English and Welsh branches (except Holts, Childs, Drummonds and possibly Berwick) were all to transfer to Williams & Glyn (and then onward to Santander at one point).Im an ex employee RBS GroupHowever Any Opinion Given On MSE Is Strictly My Own0 -
stclair said:WillPS said:stclair said:IanManc said:jackjones01 said:gary1312 said:jackjones01 said:I always thought they’d get rid of RBS in England and Wales and just have it in Scotland as a brand.
Here's a link to the RBS branch finder to help you:
https://www.rbs.co.uk/search-results/locator.html
Helpful hint: @gary1312 is right and there aren't any.
It should be noted that the plan to shrink the Royal Bank brand back to Scotland has been in the air for years - the English and Welsh branches (except Holts, Childs, Drummonds and possibly Berwick) were all to transfer to Williams & Glyn (and then onward to Santander at one point).0 -
gary1312 said:stclair said:WillPS said:stclair said:IanManc said:jackjones01 said:gary1312 said:jackjones01 said:I always thought they’d get rid of RBS in England and Wales and just have it in Scotland as a brand.
Here's a link to the RBS branch finder to help you:
https://www.rbs.co.uk/search-results/locator.html
Helpful hint: @gary1312 is right and there aren't any.
It should be noted that the plan to shrink the Royal Bank brand back to Scotland has been in the air for years - the English and Welsh branches (except Holts, Childs, Drummonds and possibly Berwick) were all to transfer to Williams & Glyn (and then onward to Santander at one point).Im an ex employee RBS GroupHowever Any Opinion Given On MSE Is Strictly My Own0 -
chuwi said:Santander re-did their online banking, making it unusable for me. I had made a load of adblock rules to remove the ads-not-ads, things like "credit card account. You have 0. Sign up now". Now the OLB has cartoons on the homepage, and will not work at all without Javascript. ......
0 -
stclair said:gary1312 said:stclair said:WillPS said:stclair said:IanManc said:jackjones01 said:gary1312 said:jackjones01 said:I always thought they’d get rid of RBS in England and Wales and just have it in Scotland as a brand.
Here's a link to the RBS branch finder to help you:
https://www.rbs.co.uk/search-results/locator.html
Helpful hint: @gary1312 is right and there aren't any.
It should be noted that the plan to shrink the Royal Bank brand back to Scotland has been in the air for years - the English and Welsh branches (except Holts, Childs, Drummonds and possibly Berwick) were all to transfer to Williams & Glyn (and then onward to Santander at one point).4 -
gary1312 said:stclair said:gary1312 said:stclair said:WillPS said:stclair said:IanManc said:jackjones01 said:gary1312 said:jackjones01 said:I always thought they’d get rid of RBS in England and Wales and just have it in Scotland as a brand.
Here's a link to the RBS branch finder to help you:
https://www.rbs.co.uk/search-results/locator.html
Helpful hint: @gary1312 is right and there aren't any.
It should be noted that the plan to shrink the Royal Bank brand back to Scotland has been in the air for years - the English and Welsh branches (except Holts, Childs, Drummonds and possibly Berwick) were all to transfer to Williams & Glyn (and then onward to Santander at one point).Im an ex employee RBS GroupHowever Any Opinion Given On MSE Is Strictly My Own0 -
gary1312 said:WillPS said:It should be noted that the plan to shrink the Royal Bank brand back to Scotland has been in the air for years - the English and Welsh branches (except Holts, Childs, Drummonds and possibly Berwick) were all to transfer to Williams & Glyn (and then onward to Santander at one point).
RBS sells 314 branches to church-backed Corsair consortium | Royal Bank of Scotland | The Guardian
By the end of 2015, despite the carve out process still being at the 'planning' phase, Virgin Money and Santander were both considering making an offer for the branches earmarked for W&G:
Santander And Virgin Eye RBS Branch Takeover | Business News | Sky News
Santander walked away, and then came back in August 2016:
Santander UK In Talks Over Swoop On RBS Unit | Business News | Sky News
Before firmly closing the door the next month:
RBS suffers fresh setback in Williams & Glyn spin-off plan | Royal Bank of Scotland | The Guardian
Then Clydesdale (which was still separate from Virgin at this point) had a go:
Clydesdale confirms Williams & Glyn offer - BBC News
It can reasonably be assumed that had any of the above taken over then the W&G brand would have been either temporary or a brand that only existed on paper. Unlike TSB (which had been maintained, albeit secondarily) the W&G name had almost no brand equity.
LBG seized the opportunity to offload a load of their business with both hands and got on with it. RBS on the other hand seemed to wobble about it - being charitable perhaps there were more organisational blockers - RBS systems were older than LBG's and LBG had in their recent history consumed TSB, then HBOS so perhaps the process of creating another bank within their systems was just simpler. Either way, they clearly were not sufficiently motivated to resolve those blockers. Perhaps there was an unwillingness from the inside or a belief that if they kick the can down the road long enough...
And as we know the branches themselves are all gone (or going soon) completely now, so those two can be assumed to be worthless. I wonder whether the rejection of the Santander and Clydesdale bids is now viewed with some regret.
(Although of course Natwest Group still have the relationships which they would have had to dispose of.)2 -
WillPS said:gary1312 said:WillPS said:It should be noted that the plan to shrink the Royal Bank brand back to Scotland has been in the air for years - the English and Welsh branches (except Holts, Childs, Drummonds and possibly Berwick) were all to transfer to Williams & Glyn (and then onward to Santander at one point).
RBS sells 314 branches to church-backed Corsair consortium | Royal Bank of Scotland | The Guardian
By the end of 2015, despite the carve out process still being at the 'planning' phase, Virgin Money and Santander were both considering making an offer for the branches earmarked for W&G:
Santander And Virgin Eye RBS Branch Takeover | Business News | Sky News
Santander walked away, and then came back in August 2016:
Santander UK In Talks Over Swoop On RBS Unit | Business News | Sky News
Before firmly closing the door the next month:
RBS suffers fresh setback in Williams & Glyn spin-off plan | Royal Bank of Scotland | The Guardian
Then Clydesdale (which was still separate from Virgin at this point) had a go:
Clydesdale confirms Williams & Glyn offer - BBC News
It can reasonably be assumed that had any of the above taken over then the W&G brand would have been either temporary or a brand that only existed on paper. Unlike TSB (which had been maintained, albeit secondarily) the W&G name had almost no brand equity.
LBG seized the opportunity to offload a load of their business with both hands and got on with it. RBS on the other hand seemed to wobble about it - being charitable perhaps there were more organisational blockers - RBS systems were older than LBG's and LBG had in their recent history consumed TSB, then HBOS so perhaps the process of creating another bank within their systems was just simpler. Either way, they clearly were not sufficiently motivated to resolve those blockers. Perhaps there was an unwillingness from the inside or a belief that if they kick the can down the road long enough...
And as we know the branches themselves are all gone (or going soon) completely now, so those two can be assumed to be worthless. I wonder whether the rejection of the Santander and Clydesdale bids is now viewed with some regret.
(Although of course Natwest Group still have the relationships which they would have had to dispose of.)
And now the fantasist in me is thinking about an alternative universe where Clydesdale bought W&G, rebranded them to Yorkshire Bank and I'm still a customer. Not sure how likely that would have been in reality mind.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.9K Spending & Discounts
- 244.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.2K Life & Family
- 258.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards