📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Octopus Heat Pumps

Options
1444547495060

Comments

  • Reed_Richards
    Reed_Richards Posts: 5,353 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 23 August 2024 at 10:08PM
    Okay
    Bedroom 1: 

    Center Type 22 Double Panel Double Convector Radiator 450 mm x 900 mm 4135 BTU

    Kitchen (No, 2)

    Center Type 22 Double Panel Double Convector Radiator 750 mm x 700 mm 4910 BTU

    Office

    Center Type 21 Double Panel Single Convector Radiator 600 mm x 700 mm 3200 BTU

    I wonder why not a type 22 in the office?  
    Reed
  • Spies
    Spies Posts: 2,267 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Thanks, that explains it, my question was somewhat badly worded!
    4.29kWp Solar system, 45/55 South/West split in cloudy rainy Cumbria. 
  • Spies
    Spies Posts: 2,267 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 23 August 2024 at 10:15PM
    Okay
    Bedroom 1: 

    Center Type 22 Double Panel Double Convector Radiator 450 mm x 900 mm 4135 BTU

    Kitchen (No, 2)

    Center Type 22 Double Panel Double Convector Radiator 750 mm x 700 mm 4910 BTU

    Office

    Center Type 21 Double Panel Single Convector Radiator 600 mm x 700 mm 3200 BTU

    I wonder why not a type 22 in the office?  
    The 'office' would likely get way too warm if running on pure weather compensation, this is my weirdly laid out house for you to raise even more questions  :D


    4.29kWp Solar system, 45/55 South/West split in cloudy rainy Cumbria. 
  • So @Spies, I guess the difficult area is your living room which requires two long and chunky radiators to match the heat loss.  If you wanted a lower maximum flow temperature you would have to cram more radiator area into that living room.  Is there scope for a third radiator or would that ruin the look?  It could be vertical.  
    Reed
  • Spies
    Spies Posts: 2,267 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    So @Spies, I guess the difficult area is your living room which requires two long and chunky radiators to match the heat loss.  If you wanted a lower maximum flow temperature you would have to cram more radiator area into that living room.  Is there scope for a third radiator or would that ruin the look?  It could be vertical.  
    It's definitely possible, there could be another radiator on the party wall which would be behind the sofa, but it wouldn't be cheap to do as it would involve cutting up the fibreboard and running new pipes
    4.29kWp Solar system, 45/55 South/West split in cloudy rainy Cumbria. 
  • But if you decided you didn't want to go with Octopus and their 50 C flow you would have to do something like that to enable you to run at a lower flow temperature.  You could run pipes behind extra-wide skirting from one of the radiators.  Plus you would need bigger radiators elsewhere too, but hopefully that's easier.  

    The office would not get too warm, even on pure weather compensation because you would adjust the flow to reduce the heat output as necessary.  But you misunderstood; I was thinking that instead of a type 21 radiator you could have a type 22 with smaller length by height to achieve a similar output.  
    Reed
  • Spies
    Spies Posts: 2,267 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Money no object, I'd have heat geek come, but I have to consider what I'm paying here and the end result!
    4.29kWp Solar system, 45/55 South/West split in cloudy rainy Cumbria. 
  • Absolutely. 

    If you added a third radiator of the same size in the living room you would boost your coverage to 156%.  So if it were me I would look up what radiator sizes I would need to achieve 150% or more in all the other rooms.  Bigger radiators would probably add very little to the total cost (and you could price that yourself) but extra radiators probably would because of the extra fitting required.  So if you could achieve 150% coverage throughout then you could run at a significantly lower flow temperature (delta T a bit less than 20 C, I think).  But there might not be room for bigger radiators or the look might be ugly.  Thinking about your options might help you decide.  
    Reed
  • MP1995
    MP1995 Posts: 495 Forumite
    100 Posts Name Dropper
    Spies said:
    Money no object, I'd have heat geek come, but I have to consider what I'm paying here and the end result!
    Do you have an idea how much more it would be with heat geeks? Is that a saving you can make on running costs for however long you intend to live there?
  • wrf12345
    wrf12345 Posts: 891 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 500 Posts
    I would be quite happy at a constant 10 degrees C during the winter months, does this have a radical or minor affect when running high temp heat pumps compared to having a near tropical temperature in the house?
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.