We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Where's my £66?
Comments
-
This I personally believe it's what is going to cause a problem for some. If, like me, you were paying £130 and then Octopus just take £63 there will be people out there who will think, oh great that's all I have to pay and won't readjust their D/D to take into account the increase in charges from October onwards.razord said:Octopus implemented this change by lowering your direct debit about 10 days ago, so DDs from 1st October would be lower.
If you then updated your direct debit to a higher amount, it would have overridden that change. They did it this way so that those people who wanted to still pay the same amount (and just gain the extra credit), could go in an edit their DDs manually.0 -
I wouldn't assume that Octopus are just going to ignore people heading into debt, and will probably be suggesting increases once people have got an understanding of what the new tariff rates mean for their monthly costs, allowing for the £67 Government contribution.Max68 said:
This I personally believe it's what is going to cause a problem for some. If, like me, you were paying £130 and then Octopus just take £63 there will be people out there who will think, oh great that's all I have to pay and won't readjust their D/D to take into account the increase in charges from October onwards.razord said:Octopus implemented this change by lowering your direct debit about 10 days ago, so DDs from 1st October would be lower.
If you then updated your direct debit to a higher amount, it would have overridden that change. They did it this way so that those people who wanted to still pay the same amount (and just gain the extra credit), could go in an edit their DDs manually.
0 -
One would hope so.MWT said:
I wouldn't assume that Octopus are just going to ignore people heading into debt, and will probably be suggesting increases once people have got an understanding of what the new tariff rates mean for their monthly costs, allowing for the £67 Government contribution.Max68 said:
This I personally believe it's what is going to cause a problem for some. If, like me, you were paying £130 and then Octopus just take £63 there will be people out there who will think, oh great that's all I have to pay and won't readjust their D/D to take into account the increase in charges from October onwards.razord said:Octopus implemented this change by lowering your direct debit about 10 days ago, so DDs from 1st October would be lower.
If you then updated your direct debit to a higher amount, it would have overridden that change. They did it this way so that those people who wanted to still pay the same amount (and just gain the extra credit), could go in an edit their DDs manually.0 -
What suppliers have failed to do, probably as a result of the late call on the EPG, is a recalculation of the annual consumer cost based on the EPG rates plus/minus any debit/credit balance. From the revised cost would have come the revised DD payment which for the next 6 months would have been discounted by £66/67.
It is all very simple given that the EPG is in all but name a fixed tariff; however, I suspect that many people will over the next few weeks be confronted with an increase in their DDs which will only add to people’s confusion.0 -
To be fair what they should have done is left peoples D/D's well alone and literally just took £67 off all bills from October till March. Then a consumer could just increase or decrease their D/D accordingly from their own decisions. We are all different. I have created a buffer of several hundred pounds in my energy account and I am happy for it to be in there. Others like any extra they have refunded into their bank accounts. Just taking £67 of all monthly bills and the relevant calculation for quarterly would be so much easier.[Deleted User] said:What suppliers have failed to do, probably as a result of the late call on the EPG, is a recalculation of the annual consumer cost based on the EPG rates plus/minus any debit/credit balance. From the revised cost would have come the revised DD payment which for the next 6 months would have been discounted by £66/67.
It is all very simple given that the EPG is in all but name a fixed tariff; however, I suspect that many people will over the next few weeks be confronted with an increase in their DDs which will only add to people’s confusion.0 -
I agree that would have been the simplest thing, and even more important I think, ALL suppliers should do, whatever was decided, the same thing, there would have been much less confusion.Max68 said:
To be fair what they should have done is left peoples D/D's well alone and literally just took £67 off all bills from October till March. Then a consumer could just increase or decrease their D/D accordingly from their own decisions. We are all different. I have created a buffer of several hundred pounds in my energy account and I am happy for it to be in there. Others like any extra they have refunded into their bank accounts. Just taking £67 of all monthly bills and the relevant calculation for quarterly would be so much easier.[Deleted User] said:What suppliers have failed to do, probably as a result of the late call on the EPG, is a recalculation of the annual consumer cost based on the EPG rates plus/minus any debit/credit balance. From the revised cost would have come the revised DD payment which for the next 6 months would have been discounted by £66/67.
It is all very simple given that the EPG is in all but name a fixed tariff; however, I suspect that many people will over the next few weeks be confronted with an increase in their DDs which will only add to people’s confusion.
(Ha ha, like you I was really happy with my 'buffer' that I'd built up for Winter, then EDF went and refunded almost all of it - I hope you manage to keep yours where it is 😄)
The important things in life are not things ........0 -
Some need the money back from their electricity supply company because they need to pay extra on gas which is with a different supplier. By giving it back (or taking less in some cases) it allows the customer the freedom to choose where it is spent.Barnsley, South Yorkshire
Solar PV 5.25kWp SW facing (14 x 375) installed Mar 22
Lux 3.6kw hybrid inverter and 9.6kw Pylontech batteries
Daikin 8kW ASHP installed Jan 25
Octopus Cosy/Fixed Outgoing2 -
Yes, that is also true.Alnat1 said:Some need the money back from their electricity supply company because they need to pay extra on gas which is with a different supplier. By giving it back (or taking less in some cases) it allows the customer the freedom to choose where it is spent.The important things in life are not things ........0 -
That was the whole point, to free up some money for spending on essentials such as gas, food, rent, etc.Alnat1 said:Some need the money back from their electricity supply company because they need to pay extra on gas which is with a different supplier. By giving it back (or taking less in some cases) it allows the customer the freedom to choose where it is spent.
That would require them all having the same payment systems, which they very much don't.funny.money said:
I agree that would have been the simplest thing, and even more important I think, ALL suppliers should do, whatever was decided, the same thing, there would have been much less confusion.Max68 said:
To be fair what they should have done is left peoples D/D's well alone and literally just took £67 off all bills from October till March. Then a consumer could just increase or decrease their D/D accordingly from their own decisions. We are all different. I have created a buffer of several hundred pounds in my energy account and I am happy for it to be in there. Others like any extra they have refunded into their bank accounts. Just taking £67 of all monthly bills and the relevant calculation for quarterly would be so much easier.[Deleted User] said:What suppliers have failed to do, probably as a result of the late call on the EPG, is a recalculation of the annual consumer cost based on the EPG rates plus/minus any debit/credit balance. From the revised cost would have come the revised DD payment which for the next 6 months would have been discounted by £66/67.
It is all very simple given that the EPG is in all but name a fixed tariff; however, I suspect that many people will over the next few weeks be confronted with an increase in their DDs which will only add to people’s confusion.0 -
It is very confusing. I thought I understood what Eon were going to do. I had seen the DD reduce from £70 to £3 in the account and £3 has gone out today. All fine so far - I will forgive them the £1, presuming they didn’t want to adjust all the DDs twice.I then entered a meter reading today. Waiting for the account to update for reading and payment. I had thought I’d see essentially a £69/70 payment added to the account but I see in the transaction list that I’ve used £3.55 of electric according to todays reading (sadly this is far from the truth) so looks like they’re deducting it from the usage instead of adding it to the payment. I await my statement…0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
