We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Jet 2 rejecting claim for a delayed flight and next action please
Comments
-
Why send another LBA? Just tell them today, when you call, that you have completed paperwork and you are submitting on MCOL within the next 7 days.
If you're new. read The FAQ and Vauban's Guide
The alleged Ringleader.........0 -
Good shout JP. please remind me what MCOL is 😅0
-
MCOL - Money Claim Online - the usually, no hassle online portal for small claims court.If you're new. read The FAQ and Vauban's Guide
The alleged Ringleader.........1 -
JPears said:MCOL - Money Claim Online - the usually, no hassle online portal for small claims court.0
-
I am having the same problem as you guys however I think they changed the terms as they pointed me to a link that states up to 60 days until they pay?
what contact number are you using as all I can find is a sales number?0 -
steviec2 said:I am having the same problem as you guys however I think they changed the terms as they pointed me to a link that states up to 60 days until they pay?
what contact number are you using as all I can find is a sales number?0 -
Hi, new to this forum but not forums in general
I claimed to jet2 for a delayed flight - the plane took off from the UK to Tenerife 3 hrs late which had a knock on event to our return flight
Below is the response wrt the claim and I am hoping someone could point me in the right direction on a way forwardPlease accept our apologies for the delay to your Jet2.com flight, xxxxxx, 01/07/2022, and any inconvenience this caused.
Article 5 (3) of EC Regulation 261/2004 (the Regulation) provides that compensation for a flight delay in excess of 3 hours is not payable where the delay was caused by extraordinary circumstances which could not have been avoided even if all reasonable measures had been taken.
Your flight was delayed due to crew sickness which prevented departure. The leading case law from the CJEU (Court of Justice of the European Union) stresses that when determining extraordinary circumstances, the focus should be on the source of the cause of the delay and not its consequences, irrespective of severity or frequency.
The source of the crew’s sickness is completely outside of an air carrier’s control, and, in line with the CJEU’s finding, we consider to be an extraordinary circumstance for the purpose of the Regulation.
The issue as to whether a member of crew’s non-attendance at work due to illness amounts to an extraordinary circumstance, for the purpose of the Regulation, is due to be considered by the Supreme Court of the UK in the case of Lipton v BA City Flyer.
We would be happy for your claim to be revisited following the outcome of the Supreme Court’s finding. Until such time, we are unable to comment further.
0 -
Suzycoll said:steviec2 said:I am having the same problem as you guys however I think they changed the terms as they pointed me to a link that states up to 60 days until they pay?
what contact number are you using as all I can find is a sales number?0 -
Yes whoever answers can normally advise. They seem to have the same number for everything 😅0
-
thejanitor said:
Your flight was delayed due to crew sickness which prevented departure. The leading case law from the CJEU (Court of Justice of the European Union) stresses that when determining extraordinary circumstances, the focus should be on the source of the cause of the delay and not its consequences, irrespective of severity or frequency.
I'm not sure this factually correct. where the delay occurs on a previous rotation.
The source of the crew’s sickness is completely outside of an air carrier’s control, and, in line with the CJEU’s finding, we consider to be an extraordinary circumstance for the purpose of the Regulation.
I'm not sure this factually correctThe issue as to whether a member of crew’s non-attendance at work due to illness amounts to an extraordinary circumstance, for the purpose of the Regulation, is due to be considered by the Supreme Court of the UK in the case of Lipton v BA City Flyer.
Until then it is NOT an EC, under law passed by the lower court.
We would be happy for your claim to be revisited following the outcome of the Supreme Court’s finding. Until such time, we are unable to comment further.
As far as I am aware crew sickness is NOT an EC as it is inherent in the running of an airline. You'll need to read up on the quoted case law to see if it actually applies here.I consider Jet2's comments/excuses to be disingenuous at best.
If you're new. read The FAQ and Vauban's Guide
The alleged Ringleader.........0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards