We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Neo Energy and Octopus

1234568»

Comments

  • Qyburn
    Qyburn Posts: 3,748 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Jon1952 said:
    The Ombudsman was pretty useless about Neo though, saying it was in administration....but agreeing that they have no record of the identity of the administrators.
    When I spoke to them that's what they said initially. We both looked on Companies House and he agreed that they weren't, but since they didn't hold a supply licence he couldn't handle a dispute anyway. Some comments about it being an odd one and maybe looking into it.

    Jon1952 said:
    Toying with the idea of a County Court money claim against Neo (given that they are still trading). Might prove interesting
    What would you be suing them for? I would have thought it better to wait for them to raise proceedings since you have bombproof defence.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.