We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Neo Energy and Octopus
Comments
-
When I spoke to them that's what they said initially. We both looked on Companies House and he agreed that they weren't, but since they didn't hold a supply licence he couldn't handle a dispute anyway. Some comments about it being an odd one and maybe looking into it.Jon1952 said:The Ombudsman was pretty useless about Neo though, saying it was in administration....but agreeing that they have no record of the identity of the administrators.
What would you be suing them for? I would have thought it better to wait for them to raise proceedings since you have bombproof defence.Jon1952 said:Toying with the idea of a County Court money claim against Neo (given that they are still trading). Might prove interesting0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards