We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
UKPC PCN Fine/CCJ - please advise
Comments
-
Search the forum for "consent orders" and see what advice has been given and what other posters have done. Would they (claimant) be offering such deals if they were confident in their case? It looks like you have submitted a N244 without consent and presumably paid £275 already. If you are confident in your case and you win, you do not pay the original PCN, you have the CCJ removed and you should have the £275 refunded.3
-
Tell them no thanks, too late, you want your costs.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD2 -
Thank you both. So does it look better if I don't ignore them even if I'm refusing them?The court has given me two dates even though I requested in my witness statement to combine them both for one hearing. The first one is a court hearing the second is a week later on a phone hearing.0
-
rodriguez51 said:Thank you both. So does it look better if I don't ignore them even if I'm refusing them?The court has given me two dates even though I requested in my witness statement to combine them both for one hearing. The first one is a court hearing the second is a week later on a phone hearing.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD1 -
Coupon-mad said:rodriguez51 said:Thank you both. So does it look better if I don't ignore them even if I'm refusing them?The court has given me two dates even though I requested in my witness statement to combine them both for one hearing. The first one is a court hearing the second is a week later on a phone hearing.Already done, got to wait to hear back from the court.Should I start a skelly now for the court date?
1 -
Do you need a skeleton argument because your case is complicated? I have seen skeleton arguments that are more complex than the defence and WS combined. You could do a crib sheet for yourself so that, if the judge asks and you get the chance, you can make sure you point the judge at your most powerful arguments.2
-
In CCJ set aside cases, a skelly is a useful vehicle to bring in the 4 case authorities about the claim being 'dead' plus the BPA or IPC CoP clause to show the mandatory requirement to "check defendant details before litigation" - as seen in the CCJ thread by @Brokenchief
The reason for the skelly is because you can't attach all 4 transcripts to the initial WS, as it would go over 50 pages (court will not accept it by email).Hence a printed skeleton and authorities bundle being served separately, in a ring binder for the Judge.
Of course the Claimant's legal firm can put up with an email or four...PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD2 -
Oops, hadn't remembered it was a set-aside when I posted that despite me writing a post three or four posts upthread about consent orders!2
-
Coupon-mad said:In CCJ set aside cases, a skelly is a useful vehicle to bring in the 4 case authorities about the claim being 'dead' plus the BPA or IPC CoP clause to show the mandatory requirement to "check defendant details before litigation" - as seen in the CCJ thread by @Brokenchief
The reason for the skelly is because you can't attach all 4 transcripts to the initial WS, as it would go over 50 pages (court will not accept it by email).Hence a printed skeleton and authorities bundle being served separately, in a ring binder for the Judge.
Of course the Claimant's legal firm can put up with an email or four...So I shoud copy all of the content in the files posted by Brokenchief into one document and print a set for myself and the judge on court day? I should have included my print costs in my draft orderDoes the claimant need to be emailed a copy?Thanks again Coupon!Le_Kirk said:Oops, hadn't remembered it was a set-aside when I posted that despite me writing a post three or four posts upthread about consent orders!
Haha no problem! thank you0 -
Sorry to bump. Any help with above?Thanks0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards