Please email your PCN story to watchdog@bbc.co.uk they want to hear about it.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including QR codes, number plates and reference numbers.
We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
CASE WON Student Accommodation with free parking
Comments
-
The collective noun for a family of mice is 'a mischief'.PPS might just have unleashed triple trouble for themselves! 🐁 🐁 🐁Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street8 -
Directions Questionnaire received, completed and returned as expected.I love how gmail treats emails from BW Legal - both auto replies went to spam
BBC WatchDog “if you are struggling with an unfair parking charge do get in touch”
Please then tell us here that you have done so.4 -
Well this has escalated nicely.The Court Ordered the Claimant PPS to produce their WS by 31/10. It arrived from BW on time, just.The Court Ordered us to produce our WS by 14/11. SniggerThe Court Ordered the Claimant to include a copy of the agreement giving them authority to regulate parking in their WS.BW supplied an unredacted copy of the contract between the property agent and PPS.I have downloaded the Land Registry entry for the property showing someone else owns the property. No Landowner authority then.And then, lo and behold - I find my son and wife exchanged numerous text and we have screen shots of contemporaneous records.Savage attack from BW for using an internet forum template - and skeleton arguement to dismiss defence. I'll upload as soon as I can.but for now - current draft isPoint 25. The mere existence of specialist parking forums is a direct consequence of the industrial scale of the operations and activities of rogue private parking companies. The one referred to (YOU GUYS) provides an extensive and well researched wealth of information. There is nothing wrong in using a reliable online resource.
Point 26 is a disingenuous and contemptuous attempt to intimidate and belittle me before the Court. The Claimant can not possibly know the extent or otherwise of my knowledge. They know nothing about my education, experience and academic capacity. They have no idea what resources are available to me, how much research I undertook or why I decided to use an available template. A template that was sufficiently well drafted that it predicted at point 14 in my defence that the Claimant would attempt to pour scorn on and rubbish my knowledge. The Claimant’s solicitor has been seen before on a regular basis.
This is not a simple small claims matter for a contractual charge payable for breach of a contractual licence. This is about standing up to a rogue PPC and their money making machine. There is nothing unreasonable about attempting to expose them for that.
The Claimant has chosen to use this attack as justification for not addressing the technical points in my defence. In doing so they have overlooked some key points - presumable hoping they are beyond my knowledge. I think the lack of landowner authority exposed above clearly demonstrates otherwise.
note to self BLAST THEM OVER UNANSWERED DEFENCE POINTS
Point 27 is disingenuous and I stand by my entire defence. The Claimant can not possibly know if the copied internet content was beyond my knowledge when I signed my defence.
Point 28 is disingenuous. There is nothing unreasonable about using a well drafted template from a reliable source. It is presumptuous of the Claimant to suggest this was done without fully researching, checking and understanding all the legal points. The Claimant can not possibly know if the information was beyond my knowledge when I signed my defence.
BBC WatchDog “if you are struggling with an unfair parking charge do get in touch”
Please email your PCN story to watchdog@bbc.co.uk they want to hear about it.Please then tell us here that you have done so.2 -
Savage attack from BW for using an internet forum template - and skeleton argument to dismiss defence. I'll upload as soon as I can.No need. We don't need to see that again. Search the forum for nonsensical and change to 'recent' (not best match).
Your letter has been seen in multiple cases (with pictures of it) and you might like to copy a few and put them on a PDF as an exhibit. As a Judge said last week when dismissing a claim where BW had accused a defendant of using a template, but of course used templates themselves:
"you live by the principle, you die by the principle".PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of this/any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD1 -
Coupon-mad said:Savage attack from BW for using an internet forum template - and skeleton argument to dismiss defence. I'll upload as soon as I can.No need.I should have separated that last sentance and been a bit clearer, I was thinking about the lack of landowner authority.A general manager (not a director) at the student property agent (company A) signed up PPS to manage parking at a property owned by company B. My son's tenancy agreement was with company B. No landowner's authority document produced as required under IPC's CoP and demanded by the Judge, just the invalid third party contract.That's a bonus on top of Pimacy of Contract. AST completely silent on parking permits.Hearing date next January if it gets that far.
BBC WatchDog “if you are struggling with an unfair parking charge do get in touch”
Please email your PCN story to watchdog@bbc.co.uk they want to hear about it.Please then tell us here that you have done so.1 -
Witness statement being proof read by son and mother as I type.Last week we decided to write to all the students in the property now and ask if they were having any problems. Just had a long reply from one who had 9 months of hell with Premier Parking Solutions - it is such a good reply it has been added to the WS after sequence of events as:"I have today received an email from a current student resident of 7 SA describing the same problems and experiences that I have described above. I have added this as Exhibit 16 to illustrate how shambolic the whole arrangement between CSL and PPS was. I do not believe there was any genuine interest in car parking management. I aver that PPS persuaded CSL that they needed a parking management solution so they could exploit unworldly students."
BBC WatchDog “if you are struggling with an unfair parking charge do get in touch”
Please email your PCN story to watchdog@bbc.co.uk they want to hear about it.Please then tell us here that you have done so.2 -
BBC WatchDog “if you are struggling with an unfair parking charge do get in touch”
Please email your PCN story to watchdog@bbc.co.uk they want to hear about it.Please then tell us here that you have done so.3 -
Thank you for attached the witness statement sent.1
-
That looks very good.
I suggest a few minor alterations and additions.
You mention the signs in the Beavis case so I think you should include a copy of the PE sign as an exhibit with an image of the claimant's sign as a comparison.
Para 37 might read better if the order of "acceptance" and "consideration" were swapped.
At para 68 you refer to a lack of due diligence to identify the landowner. They should also have carried out due diligence to determine if residents already had existing rights before they commenced operations at the site by checking ASTs and head lease (if there is one).
Para 71 should read "moot points". (I believe the word meeting is derived from the word "moot").
Para 84, add "2018" after GDPR, and perhaps add DPA 2015 as well. This assumes you have previously explained he acronyms in full.
Para 104, rather than say the lack of system notes is no surprise, perhaps you could say it shows a lack of efficiency or possible an attempt to deceive, although the latter may be a bit strong. You don't want to upset the judge.I married my cousin. I had to...I don't have a sister.All my screwdrivers are cordless."You're Safety Is My Primary Concern Dear" - Laks3 -
Coupon-mad said:Savage attack from BW for using an internet forum template - and skeleton argument to dismiss defence. I'll upload as soon as I can.No need. We don't need to see that again. Search the forum for nonsensical and change to 'recent' (not best match).
Your letter has been seen in multiple cases (with pictures of it) and you might like to copy a few and put them on a PDF as an exhibit. As a Judge said last week when dismissing a claim where BW had accused a defendant of using a template, but of course used templates themselves:
"you live by the principle, you die by the principle".
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/79215572#Comment_79215572
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6311013/urgent-assistance-ccc-defence-deadline-today/p2
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 346.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 251.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 451.1K Spending & Discounts
- 238.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 613.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 174.5K Life & Family
- 251.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards