We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Barclays Letter

Options
13»

Comments

  • born_again
    born_again Posts: 20,437 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper
    A stolen card with no usage on it would be a instant red flag to fraud staff of someone trying to pull a fast one. 🤣


    Life in the slow lane
  • GTR_King
    GTR_King Posts: 1,985 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Didn't think of that, 

    Hopefully Barclays will have systems in place to combat that issue 
  • masonic
    masonic Posts: 27,210 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 16 April 2022 at 10:28AM
    sutton111 said:
    A crime number for a stolen card? Ridiculous. I wouldn’t even trouble the Police if my card was stolen, and to get a crime number would cost Tax Payers a lot more. 
    Police should always be informed when such crimes are committed. You never know when such incidents may form part of a larger and more significant case. The police will be in a position to decide whether or not any follow-up would be a waste of taxpayer's money. Of course, you should not assume it is a theft just because your card has gone missing from where you left it.
  • Section62
    Section62 Posts: 9,787 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper
    sutton111 said:
    A crime number for a stolen card? Ridiculous. I wouldn’t even trouble the Police if my card was stolen, and to get a crime number would cost Tax Payers a lot more. 
    Requiring a crime number could also be a form of crime prevention - i.e. the fraud that would occur if someone falsely reported their card stolen to avoid the bank's fee for a replacement card.

    It also means that if a person makes a false report - to the police as well as the bank - the crime they've committed is quite a serious one so more worthy of tax payer's funds being used to investigate it.  And the investigation of low-level stuff like this often turns up something more serious along the way. (~ stopping drivers for a faulty light)
  • eskbanker
    eskbanker Posts: 37,134 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    masonic said:
    sutton111 said:
    A crime number for a stolen card? Ridiculous. I wouldn’t even trouble the Police if my card was stolen, and to get a crime number would cost Tax Payers a lot more. 
    Police should always be informed when such crimes are committed. You never know when such incidents may form part of a larger and more significant case. The police will be in a position to decide whether or not any follow-up would be a waste of taxpayer's money. Of course, you should not assume it is a theft just because your card has gone missing from where you left it.
    Agreed - in terms of actual theft versus loss/mislaying, I'm struggling to think of any scenarios where the former shouldn't be reported, given that the likes of burglary, mugging, bag snatch, etc, are clearly crimes?  For any 'lesser' theft events not considered worth reporting by the cardholder (family member or housemate taking card perhaps?), I could easily see a bank arguing that these shouldn't be exempted from replacement charges....
  • masonic
    masonic Posts: 27,210 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 16 April 2022 at 11:30AM
    eskbanker said:
    masonic said:
    sutton111 said:
    A crime number for a stolen card? Ridiculous. I wouldn’t even trouble the Police if my card was stolen, and to get a crime number would cost Tax Payers a lot more. 
    Police should always be informed when such crimes are committed. You never know when such incidents may form part of a larger and more significant case. The police will be in a position to decide whether or not any follow-up would be a waste of taxpayer's money. Of course, you should not assume it is a theft just because your card has gone missing from where you left it.
    Agreed - in terms of actual theft versus loss/mislaying, I'm struggling to think of any scenarios where the former shouldn't be reported, given that the likes of burglary, mugging, bag snatch, etc, are clearly crimes?  For any 'lesser' theft events not considered worth reporting by the cardholder (family member or housemate taking card perhaps?), I could easily see a bank arguing that these shouldn't be exempted from replacement charges....
    Indeed, and for those 'lesser' scenarios, it would be wrong to jump to the conclusion that it is theft (dishonestly appropriating property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it), when most likely there is a more reasonable explanation, such as that the friend or family member was securing the card from actual theft, or they genuinely believed the owner of the card would not object to their possession of the card in the circumstances.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.