We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
This £350 refugee thing

ProDave
Posts: 3,785 Forumite

The great British public are being asked to provide accommodation to refugees for £350 per month (if the government website would actually work)
Has anyone looked at just what sort of tenancy would be formed doing that, what rights the tenants would have and how long they would likely stay for?
I just have the feeling a lot are going to be stuck with tenants for a lot longer than they ever expected and possibly with no way to get rid of them?
0
Comments
-
Website is now live https://homesforukraine.campaign.gov.uk/0
-
That says you're not to charge rent. So whatever status they have, it won't be tenants. Presumably some form of "excluded occupier"?2
-
I can't see why it would be any different to having a lodger.
It is perfectly well settled law that you can have a lodger pay you rent - but the lodger has very few rights and can be evicted with very little notice.
If you were renting out your entire house (rather than just a room) then you would have to look at whether an assured tenancy is form, if you started taking rent in addition to £350pm government support.0 -
steampowered said:I can't see why it would be any different to having a lodger.
It is perfectly well settled law that you can have a lodger pay you rent - but the lodger has very few rights and can be evicted with very little notice.
If you were renting out your entire house (rather than just a room) then you would have to look at whether an assured tenancy is form, if you started taking rent in addition to £350pm government support.0 -
ProDave said:The great British public are being asked to provide accommodation to refugees for £350 per month (if the government website would actually work)It's not about being paid £350 per month to house refugees, that's just a thank you to presumably help towards increased utility bills.There's no rent to be paid, no tenancy created, no expectation of food and meals being included; simply a warm and safe place for people to stay for at least six months if they need to. However they will have the same (limited) rights as a lodger and can be asked to leave/move with little notice if things don't work out.Every generation blames the one before...
Mike + The Mechanics - The Living Years4 -
Ah I see, so the £350 is not "rent"I cannot see any other circumstances where being given a monthly payment for accommodation is not "rent" One rule for the government, another rule for the rest.So when you are trying to evict a tenant, tell the court they were not paying "rent" but giving you an allowance. do let us know how you get on.0
-
I'm slightly worried by this. I'm sure there's plenty of people offering rooms through altruism. I do worry that there will be some way for unscrupulous people to exploit desperate people to make a quick buck.
9 -
0
-
ProDave said:The great British public are being asked to provide accommodation to refugees for £350 per month (if the government website would actually work)Has anyone looked at just what sort of tenancy would be formed doing that, what rights the tenants would have and how long they would likely stay for?I just have the feeling a lot are going to be stuck with tenants for a lot longer than they ever expected and possibly with no way to get rid of them?6
-
ProDave said:Ah I see, so the £350 is not "rent"I cannot see any other circumstances where being given a monthly payment for accommodation is not "rent" One rule for the government, another rule for the rest.So when you are trying to evict a tenant, tell the court they were not paying "rent" but giving you an allowance. do let us know how you get on.Someone better informed will be along shortly. But the government agency that is giving you the £350, is not the person who becomes your lodger/excluded occupier. There is no 'consideration' paid by the Ukrainian person themselves. So no tenancy is created.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards