We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Completion Delay - Won't pay costs
Comments
-
babyblade41 said:elsien said:babyblade41 said:sorry I'm being a bit thick... you say you exchanged last December , but your solicitor advised against exchange but went ahead anyway ...
If exchange definitely went ahead & completion failed then a notice to complete would be given to your buyer .
If you didn't complete then why didn't you stay in your house as it would still be yours ?
You should, where possible mitigate any costs and keep them to a minimum.
You maybe able to claim any costs of your removal but not a hotel if it wasn't necessary .
Forgive me if I've mis understood
Yes, of course we could have done that, but hotel costs were minimal and the bulk of costs were related to the rebooking of moving cans and teams.
Regardless of whether it's agreed that asking for hotel costs is reasonable or not. It is still reasonable that my buyer should cover the moving costs that I could not have avoided.
My question is how I recoup these given they will not engage in reasonable communication.
0 -
What does your solicitor say?It's their job. They'll charge for it, but if the buyer is to blame then they'll have to pay for it. If it's a !!!!!!-up by their mortgage company or solicitor then they'll be liable in turn.
Presumably the onward chain is pressing you for costs if this affected everyone? It normally gets passed down.Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
6 -
Agree with @Doozergirl..your solicitor should sort this out .
What happened to your ongoing purchase as they will be chasing you for failure to complete ..3 -
My solicitor is saying they can't support any longer as they don't deal in litigation and I need to seek advice elsewhere.
I can't really afford to throw good money after bad with more solicitor fees and it's clearly the buyers' error (they did not transfer their funds to their solicitor in time and my solicitor only received all funding at 5pm-ish many, many hours after the deadline set in contracts).
I was hoping the small claims court might be a viable route, but really just wanted to check if anyone here had ever pursued that way?0 -
I suppose the question is whether your solicitor advising you not to complete puts some of the onus onto you rather than onto your buyer?All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.1 -
I presume there was no onward purchase as your buyers would be pursuing you0
-
The buyer was in clear breach of the contract we had in place, with the key clause requiring funds to be received by 12pm (and for me to vacate the property by the same time).
The funds only arrived at 5:10pm and my solicitor advised me not to complete as we could not guarantee the funds could then be moved on in time to the next solicitor to complete my onward purchase. Completing on my sale but not my purchase was in breach of my own mortgage agreements.
The moving team also wouldn't complete the move at that time of the day either, so I was doubly screwed really.
Does anyone know of any options I have to pursue this? It's not an un-sizeable sum of money and having delivered on my part of the contract, I don't see why I should be liable for costs.0 -
Is your solicitor a proper solicitor or a conveyancer?
If they're not touching it with a bargepole then it would be the small claims route but you would need to show how to tried to mitigate your costs. You'd also need to check the contract very carefully with regards to liability if the funds were received the same day albeit very late in the day.All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.2 -
I guess if you're 100% sure it's the fault of the buyer, small claims court as you said.
1 -
NNLisbon said:The buyer was in clear breach of the contract we had in place, with the key clause requiring funds to be received by 12pm (and for me to vacate the property by the same time).
The funds only arrived at 5:10pm and my solicitor advised me not to complete as we could not guarantee the funds could then be moved on in time to the next solicitor to complete my onward purchase. Completing on my sale but not my purchase was in breach of my own mortgage agreements.
The moving team also wouldn't complete the move at that time of the day either, so I was doubly screwed really.
Does anyone know of any options I have to pursue this? It's not an un-sizeable sum of money and having delivered on my part of the contract, I don't see why I should be liable for costs.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards