We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
New partner - Child from past relationship - Will
Options
Comments
-
maisie_cat said:If it were me, I'd change the joint tenants to tenants in common and leave my half of the house to my child.1
-
diego_94 said:Spendless said:It sounds very one sided tbh
However sometimes you need to dig deeper to understand someone's reasoning. When your partner talks about leaving his will that favours 'his family' exactly who is he talking about? Who currently inherits if he dies intestate? .https://www.hughjames.com/documents/docs/2020/intestacy-rules-flow-chart-february-2020-6443.pdf
For example what about your child's other parent. Do they have something to leave, so your partner is thinking they'd be provided for via them plus you to an extent, meanwhile he has a sibling/neice/nephew that he thinks anything he left them would be a help that they wouldn't otherwise get.
What is there to leave outside of the house, money, assets etc?
On the face of it, I'd make a new will but I'd also try and establish who your OH's thinking behind who they wish to inherit.
The nieces and nephews I don't have a problem with getting things, as it would help them out greatly, the same as my child. But the closeness with their family will mean my child is brushed aside with little thought if I go first.
My childs other parent does own a house as well, so my child would benefit from this. Thats if the same thing as what will potentially happen on my side happens on that side as well! Then my child is brushed aside and will miss out on both parents inheritance.
I totally understand what you mean about the 'closeness of family'. Long story but my Mum saw a snippet of my Nan's will, No idea if this was professionally done or not but it leaves her jewellery 'to her family' . Now I know full well she means by that her sibling (one remaining) and nieces, despite having a child (my Dad) 2 Grandchildren (me and sister) and 2 great grand-daughters Now I couldn't care less, about my Nan's jewellery. a) because I doubt I'll like anything she has and b) she sold most of it as scrap gold some years ago, because I was visiting when my Dad came round with the cash. I do know my Mum will be would up by the situation though and can pretty much guarantee that my parents will argue when the time comes about what 'her family' actually means.
0 -
missnosey122 said:maisie_cat said:If it were me, I'd change the joint tenants to tenants in common and leave my half of the house to my child.
1) your partner to have a lifetime interest in your half of the property and
2) your child to eventually inherit your half of the property
Solicitors do these all the time.0 -
diego_94 said:getmore4less said:This is probably the wrong board to discuss the wider issue here.
But considering the death part of it,
in most cases( we don't know ages) a child's chance of getting a death of parent house deposit is unlikely to be timely, tends to be more grandparents deaths that sync with that event and even then that can be years out.
This brings up the secondary multi generation problem of what happens to any assets you may inherit from your family.
Currently if you die first your partners family will get all that as well.
Something you may want to discuss with your parents and other family that might send things your way.
Also if your child is a minor you need to think about who will take over parental responsibility should the other parent not be interested or has pre deceased.
In terms of child, guardianship is covered between me and the other parent.
obviously over time, if your partner and your child develop their own close relationship that might change.
However, equally, it is reasonable then you want your assets, or at least some of them, to go to your child.
If the house is your main asset, then changing the ownership to tenants in common and then get proper advice and make a will. This could provide for your share of the house to pass to your partner, or for it to pass to your child with your partner having the right to occupy the property for a set period fter your death, (subject to covering the bills and maintenance, or to pass to your child but with partner having a life interest.
You may also want to consider whether you have, or should have, life insurance, and who you want to act as executors to protect your child's interests.
Ideally of course, you and your partner need to discuss these things so you are on the same page when it comes to things such as whether the survivor should have a life interest or a right to remain in the house for a shorter period of time, but don't assume anything.
(Also, bear in mind that if you left everything to your partner, even if they intend to pass some on to your child, there are lots of situations where that might not happen - for instance, if they remarry following your death but don't update their will, if they require long term care so there isn't much left by the time they pass on, etcAll posts are my personal opinion, not formal advice Always get proper, professional advice (particularly about anything legal!)1 -
mrschaucer said:missnosey122 said:maisie_cat said:If it were me, I'd change the joint tenants to tenants in common and leave my half of the house to my child.
1) your partner to have a lifetime interest in your half of the property and
2) your child to eventually inherit your half of the property
Solicitors do these all the time.
The spouse get no transferable nil rate band and can't use their own RNRB on that portion of the property as the beneficiary is not eligible.1 -
mrschaucer said:missnosey122 said:maisie_cat said:If it were me, I'd change the joint tenants to tenants in common and leave my half of the house to my child.
1) your partner to have a lifetime interest in your half of the property and
2) your child to eventually inherit your half of the property
Solicitors do these all the time.1 -
How is your husband not in the deeds of yo are married, or how can you keep a husband away from claimsing.
The OP just needs to do a tenants in common restriction and he can do what he wants with his and she can do wants with hers, on both their passings.0 -
JJWSJS8700 said:How is your husband not in the deeds of yo are married, or how can you keep a husband away from claimsing.
The OP just needs to do a tenants in common restriction and he can do what he wants with his and she can do wants with hers, on both their passings.
It's really not hard to not have him on the deeds, simply by just not adding him. The property is solely in my name.
There's no way of knowing what will happen when I die, but we can't see how a claim could be brought. He'd have to prove he was financially dependant on me etc. Solicitors did both of wills and in our circumstances was the best route for me to provide for my DD.
Forty and fabulous, well that's what my cards say....1 -
74jax said:There's no way of knowing what will happen when I die, but we can't see how a claim could be brought. He'd have to prove he was financially dependant on me etc. Solicitors did both of wills and in our circumstances was the best route for me to provide for my DD.
A spouse can also register a matrimonial interest in the family home with the LR even if they aren't on the deeds.
2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards