Breaking News: Government has announced the statutory Code of Practice, and Enforcement Framework

bargepole

Well, at least Mr Hurley is more of a realist than his counterparts at the BPA, who are still throwing their toys out of the pram.

He seems to have recognised that this is now the new order, and whether you agree with it or not, those are the new rules that all parties have to comply with, so just get on with it. It's not very different from getting a handed down Judgment in Court that is disappointing, but it is what it is and you just have to accept it.

ihatetrump

This must have been said through gritted teeth......

And most likely with no input from his sidekick in Warrington, or is he on the golf course in Knutsford taking his anger out on a little white spherical object....?

Snakes_Belly

BrownTrout said:

Will Hurley, Chief Executive of The International Parking Community (IPC) responds to confirmation (07/02/22) of the new Code of Practice for private parking issued by the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities: “The Parking (Code of Practice) Act 2019 provided a clear direction of travel and the onus is now on the private parking sector to adapt and deliver the changes embodied within the Government’s new unified Code as smoothly, quickly and effectively as possible. “I believe the industry has made significant progress over recent years in helping to drive up standards and improving the parking experience for motorists. But, the introduction of new legislation in 2019 has shown that more needs to be done.

Confirmation of the details of the new Code has now provided the certainty and clarity to enable us to do just that. The decisions have been made. It’s now up to everyone in the private parking sector to embrace the new Code and accept collective responsibility to adjust their working practices and make the required changes to fulfil the new requirements. To coin a phrase, ‘we just need to get the job done’! “It will be challenging and there are likely to be some challenges along the way as we move towards full implementation by the end of 2023.

However, I know just how resilient and progressive the industry is and, judging by the steps we have already taken and the comments from many of our Members, I have every confidence the adoption of the new Code will be achieved with minimum delay and upheaval. Through collecting and sharing data, constantly monitoring progress and harnessing a close working relationship with the DLUHC, we can also look ahead with real confidence." “Moreover, I am convinced that the implementation of the unified Code will finally help us to address the doubt and scepticism that has plagued the industry’s public perception for far too long.

The general public and the vast majority of motorists recognise the importance of effective and fair parking enforcement to ensure safety, compliance and accessibility. There is now a clear directive - supported by motoring organisations and our elected representatives - to reassure everyone that balance and fairness are truly at the heart of everything we do

. That all amounts to a wonderful opportunity for all corners of the industry – from landowners and parking operators to retailers, employers, transport providers and leisure venues – to show just how far we go to maintain the highest standards in a service area that plays such a key role in so many lives.”

 "The IPC stands ready to work with DLUHC and other key stakeholders to move through the next stage of the process and provide the framework and clarity operators now need to adopt the new code."

This must have been said through gritted teeth......

It sounds as if he wants a piece of the new order. I hope not. They need to drain the swamp. 

BrownTrout

bargepole said:

Well, at least Mr Hurley is more of a realist than his counterparts at the BPA, who are still throwing their toys out of the pram.

He seems to have recognised that this is now the new order, and whether you agree with it or not, those are the new rules that all parties have to comply with, so just get on with it. It's not very different from getting a handed down Judgment in Court that is disappointing, but it is what it is and you just have to accept it.

Aye I have to agree with this.  I guess they also want to be seen as playing an active and constructive part 
Now this raises a question @bargepole the whole industry knows why the IPC was set up and they liked the IAS appeals which ruled in the park companies favour.  What is the point of two different ATA's now the two different codes and POPLA/IAS are going in the bin, what is going to be the point of difference between the ATA's, is it simply going to be on price as it will make no difference from 2023 which ATA you are in.
I can see the two merging in time sooner or later
Am i wrong?

Snakes_Belly

"I guess they also want to be seen as playing an active and constructive part" 

The Single Tier Appeal's Service surely cannot be influenced by either ATA.  

bargepole

The IPC were granted ATA status because the DfT, who were then responsible, didn't think it right that the BPA should have a monopoly. This isn't unusual, many industries have more than one Trade Association. For example, in the removals industry, there is the British Association of Removers (BAR) and the National Guild of Removers & Storers (NGRS).

According to the BPA, the IPC had a much easier ride, and had to jump through fewer hoops in order to become accredited, something that they were quite miffed about.

Going forward, there will obviously be membership fees competition between the two, and they will be responsible for ensuring that their members comply with the new CoP, although that will also be scrutinised by a Government-appointed body. If the BPA predictions about the number of firms going bust are correct, the pool of potential members will be smaller, and it's difficult to then see a commercial justification for two ATAs.

patient_dream

"The days of wine and Roses" ..... let battle begin

ihatetrump

While the statement from Hurley @ the IPC may on the face of it be 'gracious' in tone and most likely spoken through gritted teeth, but don't forget that he owns 100% of the The Independent Appeals Service, The IAS, International Parking Community, Independent Parking Committee, The IPC and whatever else they want to trade as.  It is also highly likely that his long standing financial relationship with Gladstones still exists in some form or other. His entire livelihood and that of Gladstones are most likely at stake and me thinks, they would both say whatever is necessary to preserve as much of their ill-gotten gains as possible.

A leopard never changes its spots.

patient_dream

It is now an industry in turmoil and we now await for further tricks which now can be reported to government

This is now Independence day and there will not be a resurgence

The_Slithy_Tove

Fruitcake said:

Sandhills car park in Devon is now managed by the landowner after DSFP were booted out due to the number of complaints about them. I remember a couple of sites doing this as well.

The Lake District National Parks car parks have been though ParkingEye, then ParkWithEase (which I thought worked reasonably well with the pay machines linked to the ANPR and the ability to pay on line up to 48 hours later), and now it's self managed again with good old-fashioned Pay & Display with attendants presumably patrolling.

And as some were lauding certain hospitals' parking arrangements, can I add East Surrey Hospital to the list of those that do it right. Number plate recognition at the entry and exit barriers; pay at the machines in the hospital lobby by entering your VRN and it tells you what you owe; pay up and the barrier will open for you as you exit. Simples! And the one time I was there when it wasn't working, the exit barrier was just left open and the parking was free.