We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Falsified EPCs created by an Assessor - urgency to do something...
Options
Comments
-
So the main thing is going to be the build date of the properties - if the assessor enters this wrongly, then even solid brick gets entered as 'as built insulated'. For example, a solid brick house from 1900 would have a U-value of 2.1; entering it as say 1985 as solid brick would assume internal insulation with an assumed U-value of 0.6, so a reduction in heat loss through the walls of about 70%.
That affects a lot of other things within the calculation, which is why it's so important to get this right.2 -
This whole thread is odd!
6 -
ComicGeek said:So the main thing is going to be the build date of the properties - if the assessor enters this wrongly, then even solid brick gets entered as 'as built insulated'. For example, a solid brick house from 1900 would have a U-value of 2.1; entering it as say 1985 as solid brick would assume internal insulation with an assumed U-value of 0.6, so a reduction in heat loss through the walls of about 70%. That affects a lot of other things within the calculation, which is why it's so important to get this right.0
-
Not an EPC surveyor obvs but I think that original G rating is way off. Double glazed windows and some low energy lights and it gets a G?! I lived in a flat with single glazed windows, no wall insulation, said it had no roof insulation (that bit was incorrect) and it got an E.
I think I saw a G rating on a link shared on the "Have a Look at This" thread and the place was as habitable as a shed.0 -
MaryNB said:Not an EPC surveyor obvs but I think that original G rating is way off. Double glazed windows and low energy lights and it gets a G?! I lived in a flat with single glazed windows, no wall insulation and it got an E. I think I saw a G rating on a link shared on the "Have a Look at This" thread and the place was as habitable as a shed.0
-
adviseforumthanks said:MaryNB said:Not an EPC surveyor obvs but I think that original G rating is way off. Double glazed windows and low energy lights and it gets a G?! I lived in a flat with single glazed windows, no wall insulation and it got an E. I think I saw a G rating on a link shared on the "Have a Look at This" thread and the place was as habitable as a shed.0
-
Also plenty of flats have immersion heaters and electric panel heaters. They don't warrant a G rating. I lived in a recently converted flat that had those - and I didn't have the benefit of an off peak tariff.
I might not be a C rated property but I can't see how it's a G0 -
NameUnavailable said:This whole thread is odd!It’s only odd (I think) because the OP has not really stated their interest in this matter. Only that they think the house would make a lovely family home, and that the landlord has somehow managed to obtain an incorrect EPC rating. The rest we are only able to guess at.
It could well be personal/jealousy.
Or maybe they objected unsuccessfully for the house to be rented out at all, who knows.
I certainly don’t think it is a random crusade to warn as yet unknown tenants that the energy efficiency of their house is not as good as they were led to believe!Feb 2008, 20year lifetime tracker with "Sproggit and Sylvester"... 0.14% + base for 2 years, then 0.99% + base for life of mortgage...base was 5.5% in 2008...but not for long. Credit to my mortgage broker0 -
MaryNB said:Also plenty of flats have immersion heaters and electric panel heaters. They don't warrant a G rating. I lived in a recently converted flat that had those - and I didn't have the benefit of an off peak tariff. I might not be a C rated property but I can't see how it's a G0
-
adviseforumthanks said:MaryNB said:Also plenty of flats have immersion heaters and electric panel heaters. They don't warrant a G rating. I lived in a recently converted flat that had those - and I didn't have the benefit of an off peak tariff. I might not be a C rated property but I can't see how it's a GYou still haven't said why you're so interested in this particular property? I'm buying a flat at the moment and looking at EPC's for others in the same block I see a lot of variance. The EPC system is not really fit for purpose at it is.But what is the purpose of your crusade? Energy (no pun) would better be directed at system reform rather than one random property.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards