We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Money Moral Dilemma: Should we change the way we split household costs because we're having a baby?

Options
MSE_Kelvin
MSE_Kelvin Posts: 401 MSE Staff
Seventh Anniversary 10 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
This week's MoneySaver who wants advice asks...

My partner and I have always split every cost 50/50 at my request, despite her earning more than me. Now we've a baby on the way, she'll be taking maternity leave and so temporarily earning significantly less. Should we maintain the status quo, or should we now split costs proportionally or even combine our wages fully?

Unfortunately the MSE team can't always answer money moral dilemma questions as contributions are emailed in or suggested in person. They are intended to be a point of debate and discussed at face value. Remember that behind each dilemma there is a real person so, as the forum rules say, please keep it kind and keep it clean.

B  If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply.
  Got a Money Moral Dilemma of your own? Suggest an MMD.
«134

Comments

  • I guess it depends if it will affect the relationship and ability to parent. Money is a stress you can do without when being new parents - they need to communicate to come to an agreement 
  • Rayche
    Rayche Posts: 6 Forumite
    Photogenic Name Dropper First Post
    If both people can be trusted to put the family first, and you love your partner as you do yourself, I don't see what the point is in keeping two pockets, one each.

    I get having a pocket for savings, a pocket for living expenses, a pocket for holidays etc., but why would you store money by individual when you are both half of the same whole, with the same goals?

    If one of the couple is a gambler, addict, irresponsible then OK that could be a problem. In that case one of you needs to be the gatekeeper on the money. 
  • mrpunk50
    mrpunk50 Posts: 35 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    "Hmmm, this is a tough relationship decision. Let's ask strangers on the internet, darling!"
  • If you are planning on being a family after having the baby, I would say sharing your income works much better. Work together as a team, as a family and you will be much stronger as a result. 
  • spongebob1913
    spongebob1913 Posts: 17 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 17 August 2021 at 10:29PM
    We were in a similar situation around a year ago in that our finances were split, and we were having a baby. We decided to totally join, so everything goes in one pot and that's it. 18 months down the line it has lead to a few arguments, but would have been more I think if not in lockdown. I'm quite frugal and careful with what I spend despite earning significantly more, however my partner has never been great with money. 

    Best thing you can do regardless is put child first. You are an entity now, a family unit. I'd recommend joint everything. 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.