We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Ford Fusion??
knightstyle
Posts: 7,357 Forumite
in Motoring
DD is thinking of getting a 1.4 petrol with durashift transmission and i wondered if anyone has experience of one?
It is cheap, low miles and full Ford history so looks a decent buy.
It is cheap, low miles and full Ford history so looks a decent buy.
0
Comments
-
Automated manual system. Others may have experience. it is pre power shift which on small cars was a little problematic0
-
I like Fusions (I'm 3 months into my second one, following 3.5 years of the first one), they're a good all-round car with higher driving position and are a bit of a TARDIS - with the back seats down you'll be surprised at how much you can get in them

I would, however, if you can, go for the 1.4 diesel version - running costs so much lower than the petrol (£30 a year road tax and ave. 60+ MPG), no DPF so short journeys not an issue, and manual gearbox would be better.......Gettin' There, Wherever There is......
I have a dodgy "i" key, so ignore spelling errors due to "i" issues, ...I blame Apple
1 -
Durashifts are, as Ontheroad mentions, Automated Manuals and do suffer quite a lot from actuator problems.
The clutch actuator is the most common, when it fails and the car gets stuck in gear as it can't select neutral. This leaves you stranded as the car won't retart in gear. The selector actuator can also be a problem as they fail pretty regularly as well.
Automated Manuals don't drive particularly well either, so they tend to be cheap to buy.
1 -
This shape?

Even the newest are nine years old.
"Low mileage" is not necessarily a good thing, especially in something as quintessentially Grandma-who's-now-given-up-driving as a slightly taller automatic Fiesta.
1 -
Ain't it cute?? in mileage terms, my first one went to scrap at 164k miles due to clutch & DMF needing doing (19 year-old) and my new one has 84k on it and it's 17y-o. For £700 if I get 30k out of it (about 3 yrs-worth of mileage) with no major expenditure it'll owe me nowtAdrianC said:This shape?
Even the newest are nine years old.
"Low mileage" is not necessarily a good thing, especially in something as quintessentially Grandma-who's-now-given-up-driving as a slightly taller automatic Fiesta.
Oh, and for the OP, most repairs are pretty cheap (your typical suspension, joints, exhaust, brakes, etc.)
however, clutch & DMF would have been around 700, still cheaper than most but still a wedge (hence my first one getting scrapped
) ......Gettin' There, Wherever There is......
I have a dodgy "i" key, so ignore spelling errors due to "i" issues, ...I blame Apple
2 -
Having driven one and also a Fiesta, I'd go for a Fiesta, the Fusion seemed much less agileIf you are querying your Council Tax band would you please state whether you are in England, Scotland or Wales0
-
I don't think your average Fusion owner gives a damn about handling.lincroft1710 said:Having driven one and also a Fiesta, I'd go for a Fiesta, the Fusion seemed much less agile
If ever there was a car that said "I want to get from A to B and that's all" it's the Fusion.
Nothing wrong with that, of course.3 -
Tbh, the higher driving position is much more important than a minor difference in handling, the improved visibility in the fusion allows you to anticipate better. Plus, if like Mrs G-J you have a bad back, the Fusion is so much easier to get in and out of, she finds it easier than getting in and out of her Pug 3008..lincroft1710 said:Having driven one and also a Fiesta, I'd go for a Fiesta, the Fusion seemed much less agile......Gettin' There, Wherever There is......
I have a dodgy "i" key, so ignore spelling errors due to "i" issues, ...I blame Apple
0 -
You do not appear to have a high opinion of Fusion ownersBOWFER said:
I don't think your average Fusion owner gives a damn about handling.lincroft1710 said:Having driven one and also a Fiesta, I'd go for a Fiesta, the Fusion seemed much less agile
If ever there was a car that said "I want to get from A to B and that's all" it's the Fusion.
Nothing wrong with that, of course.If you are querying your Council Tax band would you please state whether you are in England, Scotland or Wales0 -
Well some people will prefer the Fusion's higher driving position. Fiesta felt all round more responsive and if you don't need the higher driving position, the Fiesta would be car to go for. I also have a bad back and have had little problem getting in/out of the Fiesta. Contemporary reviews tended to favour the Fiesta over the FusionGunJack said:
Tbh, the higher driving position is much more important than a minor difference in handling, the improved visibility in the fusion allows you to anticipate better. Plus, if like Mrs G-J you have a bad back, the Fusion is so much easier to get in and out of, she finds it easier than getting in and out of her Pug 3008..lincroft1710 said:Having driven one and also a Fiesta, I'd go for a Fiesta, the Fusion seemed much less agileIf you are querying your Council Tax band would you please state whether you are in England, Scotland or Wales0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

