We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Beneficiary turned 18
Comments
-
If the trustee was reluctant to take on the responsibility, they could have passed the money over to the parent to invest until the beneficiary was 18. It's not very adult to take on an unpaid role and then get upset at having to do the work.naedanger said:But on a separate matter, by acting upaid the trustee has probably saved expenses that would otherwise have been taken from your daughter's trust fund. (So maybe from the trustee's point of view they are feeling they have received no thanks but only implied complaint.)
4 -
I think you are reading more into what I wrote than I was saying. I didn't excuse the trustee, I said they should have been ready.Mojisola said:
If the trustee was reluctant to take on the responsibility, they could have passed the money over to the parent to invest until the beneficiary was 18. It's not very adult to take on an unpaid role and then get upset at having to do the work.naedanger said:But on a separate matter, by acting upaid the trustee has probably saved expenses that would otherwise have been taken from your daughter's trust fund. (So maybe from the trustee's point of view they are feeling they have received no thanks but only implied complaint.)
And I said "on a separate matter" precisely because I don't think any lack of thanks justifies providing any poorer a service than had thanks been received. But that doesn't mean, in my view, that the trustees provision of their time for nothing counts for nothing.1 -
Maybe they "invested" it in a 5 year fixed term bond?
Oops!!
Joking aside, how financially savvy ARE these trustees?
Will they have made sound judgements, or consulted an IFA?
Let's hope they didn't invest through SJP.How's it going, AKA, Nutwatch? - 12 month spends to date = 3.24% of current retirement "pot" (as at end December 2025)1 -
brooke68 said:
No, the will stated that they could invest it as they saw fit. They have never disclosed where or how it was being held.Mojisola said:Do you know what they have done with the money?
So have your daughter (or yourself) never been provided with any updates or statements showing what's been done with the money?
Have you ever asked?
Surely, even if she can't receive the money until 18, she'd be entitled to be kept in the loop, if she'd asked?How's it going, AKA, Nutwatch? - 12 month spends to date = 3.24% of current retirement "pot" (as at end December 2025)2 -
No, she has never been told anything at all. We/she have no idea where the money is or how it has been handled.Sea_Shell said:brooke68 said:
No, the will stated that they could invest it as they saw fit. They have never disclosed where or how it was being held.Mojisola said:Do you know what they have done with the money?
Has your daughter (or yourself) ever been provided with any updates or statements showing what's been done with the money?
Surely, even if she can't receive the money until 18, she'd be entitled to be kept in the loop, if she'd asked?0 -
brooke68 said:
No, she has never been told anything at all. We/she have no idea where the money is or how it has been handled.Sea_Shell said:brooke68 said:
No, the will stated that they could invest it as they saw fit. They have never disclosed where or how it was being held.Mojisola said:Do you know what they have done with the money?
Has your daughter (or yourself) ever been provided with any updates or statements showing what's been done with the money?
Surely, even if she can't receive the money until 18, she'd be entitled to be kept in the loop, if she'd asked?
Did no one ever ask?
How's it going, AKA, Nutwatch? - 12 month spends to date = 3.24% of current retirement "pot" (as at end December 2025)2 -
Foolishly we didn’t. The Will said the trustees could invest the money in any way they wanted to and initially we trusted them to make sensible decisions as they seemed genuine. My son received his share immediately as he was over 18. Any subsequent queries were met with responses along the lines of ‘you’re very lucky to be receiving this money so you should just be grateful’ (not a direct quote but very much the gist) so we didn’t push it any further.Sea_Shell said:brooke68 said:
No, she has never been told anything at all. We/she have no idea where the money is or how it has been handled.Sea_Shell said:brooke68 said:
No, the will stated that they could invest it as they saw fit. They have never disclosed where or how it was being held.Mojisola said:Do you know what they have done with the money?
Has your daughter (or yourself) ever been provided with any updates or statements showing what's been done with the money?
Surely, even if she can't receive the money until 18, she'd be entitled to be kept in the loop, if she'd asked?
Did no one ever ask?1 -
Let's hope they've honoured the "trust" in trustee.How's it going, AKA, Nutwatch? - 12 month spends to date = 3.24% of current retirement "pot" (as at end December 2025)2
-
Regardless of the history, 2 days after a solicitor's meeting is no time at all for updates to be received.
7 -
I doubt OP will get a response today either being that we are running into a bank holiday weekend. Good excuse.
2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
