We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

FIREside Chats

Options
1535456585983

Comments

  • hugheskevi
    hugheskevi Posts: 4,493 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 13 January 2022 at 6:17PM
    becky_rtw said:
    I've always contributed at least half of everything and had my own money, but because I am younger than OH when I retire I'll be becoming more reliant on his pension income, its more than enough for both of us to live off, but I'm just trying to get my head around that. 

    Do you think an "allowance" would work or do you all already have fully joint finances?
    My wife and I have had completely integrated finances for many years prior to retirement, and this will continue afterwards.
    I've always managed our finances entirely as a couple, doing what is best for the partnership and not managing them as individuals. This meant for many years my wife had significant 0% interest, free fee credit card borrowing, whilst having no savings, nor property in her own name, nor ISAs but putting very large amounts into a pension. That all ensured we had as much capital as possible, whilst optimising tax liabilities and minimising ISA charges by putting all ISA investments into my accounts.
    Most spending is on credit cards, usually 0% spending as then it is easiest to manage by just having a single large payment to make every year or so. We then just keep about £1,000 in each current account for ATM withdrawals and whatever.
    We have a joint bills and stuff account but not a full joint account. We are totally open with money, but I've always been financially independent  and 'paid my way', so its probably more in my head than anything. I'll be bringing significant investments and cash, but my pension will always be small and not payable for another 28 years open_mouth 
    We have two joint current accounts. This is primarily to avoid the risk of being reliant on a single institution, and also to gain account benefits. Of these two accounts, I primarily use one, and my wife primarily uses the other. That is mainly to make sure both are active, and having spend largely separated can be easier if I need to track down an historic transaction.
    As time passes and various investments and pensions come into payment I'll tweak timings, from which account funds are taken etc, so as to smooth resources over time, and ensure that the survivor's income of whichever of us dies first is the same whoever dies first.
    I think the key thing is having more resources available than you spend, once that is the case it doesn't really matter how resources are managed, as long as they are not wasted.

  • We've had completely joint finances since we bought our first house 23 years ago. We have various current, savings and ISA accounts in various names to take advantage of offers/stoozing etc. Our daily spends mainly go on a credit card with the odd bit of cash from our joint account.

    I think there are two issues here, the first being to accept that the structure of your income will be different. I get it... I've contributed the same if not more than my husband throughout our relationship, even when our chidlren were small and I was the main carer. Like you, I can't imagine not contributing because that's one of my 'jobs'. 

    It's a mindset change and I suspect it wouldn't take too long to adjust. I'd talk to your husband about it, I expect you will get lots of reassurance not to worry.

    In terms of managing this practically I would either go joint with a joint account for bills and a joint credit card for spends or have two separate credit cards for spends.  
  • savingholmes
    savingholmes Posts: 28,958 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    @savingholmes - chat on the pensions board suggests the ship has sailed - no providers who will accept transfers as of fairly recently
    Just to clarify - it appears no providers will accept transfers on an insistent client basis, ie, where an adviser has provided a recommendation not to transfer. If an advisor recommends a transfer there should be no problem.
    I couldn't get any to accept me at age 50 - they all said I had to wait until age 55+

    Also Money helper(.org) suggests you can no longer transfer an unfunded (normally public sector) DB unless it is to another DB Pension
    Mine is a funded DB pension that I'd like to move. I have a second public sector DB pension that I plan to keep.
    Achieve FIRE/Mortgage Neutrality in 2030
    1) MFW Nov 21 £202K now £174.8K Equity 32.77%
    2) £3K Net savings after CCs 6/7/25
    3) Mortgage neutral by 06/30 (AVC £22.5K + Lump Sums DB £4.6K + (25% of SIPP 1.1K) = 28.2/£127.5K target 22;12% updated 6/7
    4) FI Age 60 income target £16.5/30K 55.1%
    5) SIPP £4.6K updated 6/7/25
  • edinburgher
    edinburgher Posts: 13,840 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Funded public sector pensions are fab - certainly helps me sleep easier 👍
  • savingholmes
    savingholmes Posts: 28,958 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    It certainly makes future planning easier
    Achieve FIRE/Mortgage Neutrality in 2030
    1) MFW Nov 21 £202K now £174.8K Equity 32.77%
    2) £3K Net savings after CCs 6/7/25
    3) Mortgage neutral by 06/30 (AVC £22.5K + Lump Sums DB £4.6K + (25% of SIPP 1.1K) = 28.2/£127.5K target 22;12% updated 6/7
    4) FI Age 60 income target £16.5/30K 55.1%
    5) SIPP £4.6K updated 6/7/25
  • becky_rtw
    becky_rtw Posts: 8,393 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Just an update from us. 

    We are still crunching some numbers at the moment and getting up to date valuations. Wow Capital Gains + Corporation tax is painful. Then there will be no doubt many many specialist agency fees. 

    Anyway, all okay, but we may have to revise down our new house budget or hope that the last valuation we had on the property has increased enough to offset some of the tax liability. It was 2014 so one would hope that was the case, but being part commercial does mean the same rules dont always apply. 

    Another option is that I carry on working for longer than planned, we'll just have to see where we net out in a few weeks time to see which scenarios look realistic and achievable.


  • CCW007
    CCW007 Posts: 1,081 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Exciting times Becky, made possible by your planning!  It helps to see plans coming together for people. 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.