We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Non married ex asking to see my accounts
Comments
-
A prenup wouldn’t make the slightest difference here because they weren’t married.All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.3 -
I do not want to engage with the solicitor without having a solicitor to make sure my wording is correct etc. My belief, as intimated/stated before is that my ex would like a % of my biggest asset ie my house, even though I paid for it pre our relationship. It’s all here.........................“We understand that you are paying a nominal level of child maintenance to our client. We have advised our clients that they could make an application to the Court for one or more of the following Orders:-
a) Periodical payments for our clients on the children’s behalf, or to the children themselves;
b) Secured periodical payments for our clients on the children’s behalf, or to the children;c) A lump sum for our clients on the children’s behalf or for the children themselves;d) Settlement of property for the benefit of the children;e) Transfer of property to our clients on the children’s behalf or to the children themselves.Our client would like to discuss financial maintenance and up-keep of child and to this end would like to invite you to agree to disclose your financial position and assets to her in the hope that an agreement can be reached regarding the maintenance of child and his future. “
TIA
0 -
justworriedabit said:elsien said:A prenup wouldn’t make the slightest difference here because they weren’t married.
It may not be called a prenup but I stand by what I have said re married people prenups and those living like a couple. Yep, don't take my word for it as there is a mass of info on the net that supports prenup or similar agreements for those living outside wedlock.
Just one of the many sites that agrees with my stance
https://www.goodhousekeeping.com/uk/consumer-advice/money/a30870044/prenups-explained/
I therefore recommend that everyone going into a marriage or similar consider a prenup or something that is the same but different in name only if you are wanting to live together as a couple.
Thank you.0 -
Do you still have regular contact with your child? Is she likely to frustrate contact if you don't engage with her, even if it's to demonstrate that you are paying all that you can/ are obliged to?0
-
68ComebackSpecial said:Do you still have regular contact with your child? Is she likely to frustrate contact if you don't engage with her, even if it's to demonstrate that you are paying all that you can/ are obliged to?0
-
So she is not claiming for herself. She is claiming on behalf your son. She wants money from the house for your( joint) child's future. Either paid direct to the child or to her on behalf of the child.
I do not want to engage with the solicitor without having a solicitor to make sure my wording is correct etc.
You need to consult your own solicitor now.0 -
elsien said:A prenup wouldn’t make the slightest difference here because they weren’t married.
only difference is the name they go by. My post clearly state what these contracts hope to achieve if a partnership goes wrong.
It may not be called a prenup but I stand by what I have said re married people prenups and those living like a couple.
Perhaps don't take my word for it as there is a mass of info on the net that supports prenup or similar agreements for those living outside wedlock.
Just one of the many sites that agrees with my stance and it is very, very clear.
https://www.goodhousekeeping.com/uk/consumer-advice/money/a30870044/prenups-explained/
I therefore recommend that everyone going into a marriage or similar consider a prenup or something that is the same but different in name only if you are wanting to live together as a couple. Prenup or whatever you want to call it, draw up a contract via solicitors if you want to safeguard your hard work and not get kicked when you are down.
Thanks.-1 -
janpaul said:68ComebackSpecial said:Do you still have regular contact with your child? Is she likely to frustrate contact if you don't engage with her, even if it's to demonstrate that you are paying all that you can/ are obliged to?
Assume she will get a lot, lot more than she deserves and this will make you even more eager to keep what is rightly yours.
I hate to say this but from what I have seen, when people don't get what they want in break ups even though they do not deserve it, things can quickly change. There, be prepared for possible untruths. I hope it never happens but at least you will be prepared should that happen.
0 -
justworriedabit said:janpaul said:68ComebackSpecial said:Do you still have regular contact with your child? Is she likely to frustrate contact if you don't engage with her, even if it's to demonstrate that you are paying all that you can/ are obliged to?
Assume she will get a lot, lot more than she deserves and this will make you even more eager to keep what is rightly yours.
I hate to say this but from what I have seen, when people don't get what they want in break ups even though they do not deserve it, things can quickly change. There, be prepared for possible untruths. I hope it never happens but at least you will be prepared should that happen.7 -
I’m not a lawyer, but the key phrase in the letter is ‘we would like to invite you’... presumably if you say no, they will apply to the Court for that info to be released. My advice is don’t ignore it, get some legal advice and find out where you stand and what you need to do.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards