Claim Form from DCBLegal.

Coupon-mad

No.  This is like pulling teeth...all they were saying was to remove the weird sub-heading 'For your Information:' !

Also remove this sentence:

This was from First Parking Llp for £100, this was not taken seriously.

Robbo25

This is being used for Paragraph 3

3.   On the 05/09/2019 the driver was delivering a washing machine to a tenant of 
Then to his surprise the defendant received an Invoice/PCN (Parking Charge Notice) not to be confused with a (Penalty Charge Notice) issued by councils around the country.

The defendant would like to bring to attention the Jopson vs Homeguard (Services) case where the judge said stopping/delivering is not parking.

Is this better? 

nosferatu1001

Yes, but marginally
Look - when you read the rest of the template, did you see how cases were introduced? No "bring to attention" wording. 

nosferatu1001

This isnt a trick question
You have been told the way y ou introduce a court reference isnt up to scratch
So the obvious thing to do would be to read the restr of the template, and copy that approach
I struggle to work out why you are not taking this on board, having been directed to it more than once. 

D_P_Dance

Are you saying to just use Jopson as opposed to Jopson vs Homeguard?

Are they not the same?

Robbo25

nosferatu1001 said:

Yes, but marginally
Look - when you read the rest of the template, did you see how cases were introduced? No "bring to attention" wording. 

This is being used for Paragraph 3

3.   On the 05/09/2019 the driver was delivering a washing machine to a tenant of 
Then to his surprise the defendant received an Invoice/PCN (Parking Charge Notice) not to be confused with a (Penalty Charge Notice) issued by councils around the country.

3.a  The Defendant will rely upon the judgments on appeal of HHJ Harris QC in Jopson v Homeguard [2016] B9GF0A9E (Services) case where the judge said stopping/delivering is not parking.

Robbo25

Is this better now? Anything else to add to this? 
Thanks. 

nosferatu1001

Read the line
Does it make sense as a whole sentence?
Why is it a new para, and why does it have no para number?

Robbo25

nosferatu1001 said:

Read the line
Does it make sense as a whole sentence?
Why is it a new para, and why does it have no para number?

This is being used for Paragraph 3

3.   On the 05/09/2019 the driver was delivering a washing machine to a tenant of 
Then to his surprise the defendant received an Invoice/PCN (Parking Charge Notice) not to be confused with a (Penalty Charge Notice) issued by councils around the country.

The Defendant will rely upon the judgments on appeal of HHJ Harris QC in Jopson v Homeguard [2016] B9GF0A9E (Services) case where the judge said stopping/delivering is not parking.

Fruitcake

I suggest you remove 3 (a).

When I say remove 3 (a), I mean remove 3 (a), not the sentence that comes after it.