Claim Form from DCBLegal.

Redx

Still says the word I despite me mentioning it earlier , no defence paragraph 3 contains the word I , nor Me , Myself , or My !!

No need for the info about LBC or charges or the claim form etc

A defence sets the scene plus any legal arguments , so as I said earlier , you haven't read other recent paragraph 3 posts in recent cases over the last 5 months

You do not put most of that info into a defence

KeithP

Robbo25 said:

I Now have a Claim Form from DCBLegal for £253.32 with a issue date of 10 Feb 2021.

Why do you keep telling us this?

Robbo25

KeithP said:

Robbo25 said:

I Now have a Claim Form from DCBLegal for £253.32 with a issue date of 10 Feb 2021.

Why do you keep telling us this?

On the 05/09/2019 (name removed) was dropping off a washing machine which was sold online to a tenant of (Address Removed)
The actual address is: (Address Removed)

Then to my surprise (Name Removed) received an Invoice/PCN (Parking Charge Notice) not to be confused with a (Penalty Charge Notice) issued by councils around the country.

This was from First Parking Llp for £100, this was not taking seriously as having read about these companies online, they are currently being investigated by Parliament

DCBLegal have added an extra £60 which courts have called this a DOUBLE RECOVERY/ABUSE OF PROCESS.

For your Information:

Also I would like to bring the Jopson vs Homeguard (Services) case where the judge said stopping/delivering is not parking.

Thanks for assistance.
Is this any better?

KeithP

A few slight alterations gets you to...

On the 05/09/2019 the driver was delivering a washing machine to a tenant of (Address Removed).

Then to his surprise the Defendant received an Invoice/PCN (Parking Charge Notice) not to be confused with a (Penalty Charge Notice) issued by councils around the country.

This was from First Parking Llp for £100, this was not taken seriously.

Robbo25

KeithP said:

A few slight alterations gets you to...

On the 05/09/2019 the driver was delivering a washing machine to a tenant of 

Then to his surprise the Defendant received an Invoice/PCN (Parking Charge Notice) not to be confused with a (Penalty Charge Notice) issued by councils around the country.

This was from First Parking Llp for £100, this was not taken seriously.

On the 05/09/2019 the driver was delivering a washing machine to a tenant of 
Then to his surprise the defendant received an Invoice/PCN (Parking Charge Notice) not to be confused with a (Penalty Charge Notice) issued by councils around the country.

This was from First Parking Llp for £100, this was not taken seriously.

For your Information:

Also the defendant would like to bring to attention the Jopson vs Homeguard (Services) case where the judge said stopping/delivering is not parking.

Any better?

Redx

It's better now that it uses the words , the defendant , and , the driver , so await improvements suggestions or improve it , as long as there is time to improve it

Any I this and I that , plus your story ,  is saved for the witness statement (yours) in a few months time

Robbo25

Redx said:

It's better now that it uses the words , the defendant , and , the driver , so await improvements suggestions or improve it , as long as there is time to improve it

Any I this and I that , plus your story ,  is saved for the witness statement (yours) in a few months time

Thanks very much for your help, I have around around 2 weeks still, so that's a very good start.
Going to have a much needed read of the Neebies again.
Thanks.

KeithP

I don't see any point in adding to what I said earlier.

P.s. you've still left in "this was not taking seriously".
It should be "this was not taken seriously" - as I wrote earlier.

Coupon-mad

I don't understand why you've put this, when the template defence includes it already:

DCBLegal have added an extra £60 which courts have called this a DOUBLE RECOVERY/ABUSE OF PROCESS.

You are using the full template and just putting your #3 into it, yes? If so then you don't need to type things the template more than covers further down.

Robbo25

Coupon-mad said:

I don't understand why you've put this, when the template defence includes it already:

DCBLegal have added an extra £60 which courts have called this a DOUBLE RECOVERY/ABUSE OF PROCESS.

You are using the full template and just putting your #3 into it, yes? If so then you don't need to type things the template more than covers further down.

Edited.

Paragraph 3

On the 05/09/2019 the driver was delivering a washing machine to a tenant of 
Then to his surprise the defendant received an Invoice/PCN (Parking Charge Notice) not to be confused with a (Penalty Charge Notice) issued by councils around the country.

This was from First Parking Llp for £100, this was not taken seriously.

For your Information:

The defendant would like to bring to attention the Jopson vs Homeguard (Services) case where the judge said stopping/delivering is not parking.