CCJ

KeithP

KLP22 said:

I tried to confirm with Edmonton County Court that the case was with them- but I can't get a response, my credit report says it's with Northampton..but Northampton is saying it's not with them. 

I think you'll find it is with the County Court Business Centre, which is in Northampton but a different establishment to the Northampton County Court.

But as @nosferatu1001 says, "Send it to an actual court, Edmonton if that is local to you."

KLP22

I have done my WS/draft order and got my evidence in the right order.
Just to confirm with PE I am emailing this N244/WS/draft order to enforcement@ parkingeye.co.uk 
Best wishes
K

KLP22

Redx said:

some common mistakes I noticed

1) the WS had the wrong statement of truth in it, seeing as it changed to a much longer paragraph in april of last year

2) the CCBC in Northampton is not the county court, that building and workload is a completely different address in Northampton

if you are dealing with the CCBC in Northampton , its a government office, a business centre , not a county court

yes the claim was originated there, because nearly all claims are, the clue is Business Centre , BC , a single point of initial contact

so be it Edmonton or the CCBC or wherever , somebody somewhere has a record , but it will not be the County Court in Northampton if that is who you contacted, of that you can be sure (unless it happened to be your local court due to living in Northampton) - the fact that both locations are in Northampton is just Geography so you are mixing the two up in your replies or contacts, or both

Statement of Truth

I believe that the facts stated in this defence are true.  I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.

Is the above the most up to date statement of truth? 

Redx

It is for a defence , not a witness statement , the clue is in the name 🙃

KLP22

Redx said:

It is for a defence , not a witness statement , the clue is in the name 🙃

oops! I'm so glad you are all here to spot my mistakes!!

Redx

KLP22 said:

Redx said:

It is for a defence , not a witness statement , the clue is in the name 🙃

oops! I'm so glad you are all here to spot my mistakes!!

sometimes we get told off by newbies for being so pedantic , yet the reality is that it comes down to the minutia in the details , it has to be accurate because its a legal topic, you see this daily in law making and treaties etc, even full stops or commas in the wrong place can cause repercussions of much greater magnitude

the devil is in the detail, including addresses and what the businesses do at those addresses , changes in rules or the law, nothing stays the same

KLP22

Redx said:

KLP22 said:

Redx said:

It is for a defence , not a witness statement , the clue is in the name 🙃

oops! I'm so glad you are all here to spot my mistakes!!

sometimes we get told off by newbies for being so pedantic , yet the reality is that it comes down to the minutia in the details , it has to be accurate because its a legal topic, you see this daily in law making and treaties etc, even full stops or commas in the wrong place can cause repercussions of much greater magnitude

the devil is in the detail, including addresses and what the businesses do at those addresses , changes in rules or the law, nothing stays the same

Totally agree. I didn’t realise the magnitude of writing a WS and getting all the evidence set out correctly. It’s been a steep learning curve. This forum has been fantastic. 

I will keep you all posted on the outcome. 

KLP22

Before I send everything off- would it be okay to post my final documents (redacted) on here for a once over?

I appreciate all your time and expertise.

Coupon-mad

Yes, certainly. 

KLP22

UPDATE. I received an email from PE consenting to set aside- guess that's progress!