We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Boiler to be replaced
Comments
-
Yes I did, but I don't think the law would have been interpreted in that way for the man in the street, or someone having a boiler fitted, which is the pertinent case here. I think (as did the public) that the Dominic Cummings argument it is for extreme cases not envisaged by the legislation, not a bit of discomfort. The exception applicable if you really can't be in the cold for health reasons is already there and I quoted it earlier.Andy_L said:
That is how the law works - if it meant you can only leave for these reasons it would say so.Jeremy535897 said:
Then it says:Andy_L said:Jeremy535897 said:
Where in the law does it say this?Andy_L said:
There is for being away from your home (which is what the OP would risk being done for), but not for if a hotel can rent you a roomJeremy535897 said:
There is no blanket "reasonable excuse" exemption.Andy_L said:
Or any "reasonable excuse" I'd be happy that "I've no heating/hot water, there's snow on the ground & I've a couple of hairy 'rsed plumbers traipsing around the house" is a reasonable excuse for not being at home and see where the copper gets with the "Engage, Explain, Educate & Enforce" 4 step approach in the unlikely event they turn up at the hotel demanding to see everyone's papers.Jeremy535897 said:You can leave your home "to avoid injury or illness or to escape a risk of harm".
The OP's problem is will Travel Lodge see it as an "unable to return home" reason that allows them to let him have a room
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2020/1374/contentsPART 1Restrictions on movement
Restrictions on leaving home
1.—(1) No person who lives in the Tier 4 area may leave or be outside of the place where they are living without reasonable excuse.
"(2) For the purposes of sub-paragraph (1)—
(a)the circumstances in which a person has a reasonable excuse include where one of the exceptions set out in paragraph 2 applies;"
I know Dominic Cummings put your argument forward, in that "include" means "Include but not limited to", but I think that the court of public opinion saw that for what it was.
Plus,ISTR that you asked where the law said that, rather than the Court of Public Opinion.0 -
The CPS, Met Police, House of Common's Research Library (and loads of other legal beagle types) disagree with youGrumpy_chap said:All the exceptions are listed in the legislation. Anything not included in that list is excluded and not permitted.0 -
You are correct, and I regret it if I did not make it clear in my earlier post. The exceptions are non-exhaustive, but if you leave home for a reason that is not in the exceptions, you have to be prepared to fight a battle on what is a reasonable excuse (which will include a defence to the question as to why it wasn't on the exception list), and Dominic Cummings' case showed how difficult that is.Andy_L said:
The CPS, Met Police, House of Common's Research Library (and loads of other legal beagle types) disagree with youGrumpy_chap said:All the exceptions are listed in the legislation. Anything not included in that list is excluded and not permitted.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
