We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
CP Plus Claim
Comments
-
Illegible, not ineligible.
State it is written so small it cannot be read from a moving car. OR similar.4 -
Cheers. Makes much more sense.KeithP said:Why doesn't para 2 just say...
2. It is admitted that the Defendant was the registered keeper and driver of the vehicle in question but liability is denied.1 -
This is placed at the side of a road with no pedestrian path, on double yellow lines, with print so small it is ineligible.
Maybe you meant: -
This is placed at the side of a road with no pedestrian path, on double yellow lines, with print so small it is illegible ineligible.3 -
"The first signage clearly placed is on exiting the premises. This is placed at the side of a road with no pedestrian path, on double yellow lines, with print so small it is ineligible."
In relation to this point, I would like to add something that explains how even if the sign was legible, I cannot have willingly entered into a contract having not been exposed to any information until the end of my stay
Having a difficult time wording that eloquently. If anyone has any suggestions that would be great. Or would you not bother with it?0 -
save it for the WS
2 -
thank youRedx said:save it for the WS1 -
Morning all. Is it still worth attaching the 6 page Southampton judgement to my defence? It is mentioned in some places to do so and not in others.0
-
No, do not do so. It is not in the template, nor the newbies3
-
Use the Excel v Wilkinson judgment - provided it is relevant, you can lead it in (not simply 'stapling' it to your Defence) and you understand what it is you are submitting and why.littlepea1 said:Morning all. Is it still worth attaching the 6 page Southampton judgement to my defence? It is mentioned in some places to do so and not in others.Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.#Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street3 -
Thank you all. Defence submitted. I must say I'm quite daunted by the telephone process reading through the thread, and the seemingly significant amount of extra preparation and time it will take to get to where I need to be for this.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards