Screen PCN as a resident in resident only parking

Redx

It may not have been received but without a SAR you have no idea if an NTK PCN was issued and sent

You are the data subject under the GDPR law , not the vehicle
It's your choice if you wish to include the PCN and VRM references to make it easier for the PPC

Adrian1999

Redx said:

It may not have been received but without a SAR you have no idea if an NTK PCN was issued and sent

You are the data subject under the GDPR law , not the vehicle
It's your choice if you wish to include the PCN and VRM references to make it easier for the PPC

As the PPC is not a BPA registered. Their failure to comply with PoFa and the possibility of voiding "no keepers liability" wouldn't even apply here? Regardless if I do a SAR? If so, I am getting the idea of how, even more idiotic non-BPA PPCs are.

How best would you recommend wording the email to refer to my case? Just want to make sure I don't need to make this worse than it is.

Many thanks.

Redx

Just read other threads where it's been covered , like every topic you will find advice and suggested wordings , I know because I have seen them numerous times , plus it's got nothing to do with parking , it's data protection under the DPA 2018

I fail to see what not being BPA AOS registered has to do with POFA , plus some BPA members like Apcoa never comply with POFA !!

If you were the driver and are asked in court by the judge or the claimant , any answer you give won't help keeper liability or not , POFA can only protect a keeper that wasn't the driver

Coupon-mad

You just need to email the DPO of the PPC, telling them to:

(a) rectify your address data and to erase the old address, and

(b) send you a copy of all data held, all letters sent (a SAR).

Adrian1999

Coupon-mad said:

You just need to email the DPO of the PPC, telling them to:

(a) rectify your address data and to erase the old address, and

(b) send you a copy of all data held, all letters sent (a SAR).

Thank you Coupon. The DPO has been contacted regarding both points.

For clarification, is there a set time for the MA to request the PPC to cancel the PCN? As my point of contact suggested to speak with the PPC previously and this is where I am now. I am going to speak formerly with the MA, and hope to approach them informatively. I couldn't find an explicit explaining to not declare myself as keeper and believe they will just use this to brush me off.

Adrian1999

Very surprised. I have had a very rapid response from the PPC fulfilling the SAR.

Upon reflection, I realise my naivity and lack of understanding. There was an initial correspondance from the PPC, stating "as a gesture of good will requesting the V5c and the identification of the driver". Their request to identify the driver made me become very defensive and not read the letter correctly. However, I understand the purpose of the V5c would of been to verify my residency? If so, then could of avoided this whole scenario?

Redx

A landowner or M A can request a chance at want time , but the contract between them may try to limit that time

A letter asking for driver details is usually the NTK PCN , that paragraph tends to be in them , so yes you received a postal NTK , a Notice To the Keeper , by post , presumably 29 or more days after the event ?

The PPC can only obtain the keeper details once per NTK data check , within 6 months , which costs them money to obtain. That DVLA data does not confirm your residency , it confirms the address the vehicle was registered to at the time the V5C was completed , at handover time , which may or may not be your residency , but could have been

Proof of your residency is your lease or AST

Adrian1999

Redx said:

A landowner or M A can request a chance at want time , but the contract between them may try to limit that time

A letter asking for driver details is usually the NTK PCN , that paragraph tends to be in them , so yes you received a postal NTK , a Notice To the Keeper , by post , presumably 29 or more days after the event ?

The PPC can only obtain the keeper details once per NTK data check , within 6 months , which costs them money to obtain. That DVLA data does not confirm your residency , it confirms the address the vehicle was registered to at the time the V5C was completed , at handover time , which may or may not be your residency , but could have been

Proof of your residency is your lease or AST

Right thank you, this makes sense.

Previous communication through the appeal process (Within the 14 day period of pay early for a discount) I informed them I was a resident, in which they requested a copy of my V5c and to confirm if I was the driver. This was before a NTK was 'created' as shown the provided SAR.

SO inconspicuously this process could get me to complete a NTK without me knowing?

KeithP

Adrian1999 said:

Redx said:

A landowner or M A can request a chance at want time , but the contract between them may try to limit that time

A letter asking for driver details is usually the NTK PCN , that paragraph tends to be in them , so yes you received a postal NTK , a Notice To the Keeper , by post , presumably 29 or more days after the event ?

The PPC can only obtain the keeper details once per NTK data check , within 6 months , which costs them money to obtain. That DVLA data does not confirm your residency , it confirms the address the vehicle was registered to at the time the V5C was completed , at handover time , which may or may not be your residency , but could have been

Proof of your residency is your lease or AST

SO inconspicuously this process could get me to complete a NTK without me knowing?

What??

You can never complete a NTK - especially without knowing about it.  

Redx

It's certainly cheaper than paying the DVLA for Keeper details

Parking sc#mmers will use any subterfuge to make a profit , especially victimising tenants etc (captive audience)