Formal Letter of Claim from QDR Solicitors instructed by ZZPS on behalf of SABA

Umkomaas

Redx said:

MrReddy said:

Update: I had sent a SAR request to the Car Park Operator and have received the data they hold. I have also replied to the solicitors saying that I am seeking advice and to keep further actions on hold. I will go down to the station and take some pics (to see if it is covered under bylaws). 
What are the next steps from here on, please?

Gather your evidence and await a court claim pack from the CCBC in Northampton

Which will be interesting, as I don't think I've seen a Saba/ZZPS/QDR case get that far!

D_P_Dance

If the land is covered by bye-laws anf they do not know who was driving they would be likely to strugle u

MrReddy

Update: So the solicitors now reply saying that 1) They checked their client's database and didn't find SAR request (I sent SAR to SABA and they have acknowledged my request unless they checked ZPPS database)
2) I replied to their formal letter via Email on 21st Oct as the library is not offering a printing service and I don't have a working printer at home. They are saying today, 27th Oct that if they do not get a reply by 24th Oct, the Client will instruct them to issue a County Court Judgement. Although they have acknowledged receiving my email (Automail) on 21st Oct and have also carried out a security/identity check on 22nd Oct. They also claim that the time to dispute this matter has passed and no further dispute will be accepted. 

Umkomaas

the Client will instruct them to issue a County Court Judgement.

Is that literally what they have said?

D_P_Dance

Only judges can decide who pays and who does not.  A  CCJ only happens when a judge finds for the claimant and the motorist fails to pay   

If those words were written by a solicitor bring them to the attention of the SRA.

https://www.sra.org.uk/

MrReddy

Umkomaas said:

the Client will instruct them to issue a County Court Judgement.

Is that literally what they have said?

Yes

D_P_Dance

Then dio it!

beamerguy

MrReddy said:

Update: So the solicitors now reply saying that 1) They checked their client's database and didn't find SAR request (I sent SAR to SABA and they have acknowledged my request unless they checked ZPPS database)
2) I replied to their formal letter via Email on 21st Oct as the library is not offering a printing service and I don't have a working printer at home. They are saying today, 27th Oct that if they do not get a reply by 24th Oct, the Client will instruct them to issue a County Court Judgement. Although they have acknowledged receiving my email (Automail) on 21st Oct and have also carried out a security/identity check on 22nd Oct. They also claim that the time to dispute this matter has passed and no further dispute will be accepted. 

Let us hope QDR read this forum .... this sort of rubbish gets a spanking in court and a judge would not take kindly to a parking junkie thinking they can issue CCJ's 

QDR has access to a another companies database ?  Is this just pie in the sky stuff by QDR or is this a serious concern for the ICO ?

nosferatu1001

MrReddy said:

Umkomaas said:

the Client will instruct them to issue a County Court Judgement.

Is that literally what they have said?

Yes

Highly doubtful, as of course they cannot issue a judgment. They can ask a court for one. Please show us the response 

MrReddy

nosferatu1001 said:

MrReddy said:

Umkomaas said:

the Client will instruct them to issue a County Court Judgement.

Is that literally what they have said?

Yes

Highly doubtful, as of course they cannot issue a judgment. They can ask a court for one. Please show us the response 

So they say that the "time for dispute has passed and no further dispute will be accepted" and then follow it by "It is important you respond to the reply form sent to you by 24th Oct (this email is from today 27th Oct). Before threatening with CCJ.