We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Ravenside Retail Park, Chesterfield
Comments
-
The IAS appeal worked and the charge has been cancelled, thanks for the advice folks.BrownTrout said:
Write this, keep it simpletopley4718 said:
Do I just write it as simply as that or is their a template.BrownTrout said:
for this site/type of case though i would appeal to the IAS , just deny leaving site and state there is no evidence of this, and then see what they come back with (or if they concede etc...)Coupon-mad said:You already know from the NEWBIES thread, and every other UKCPS thread you read...not to try the kangaroo court.
Please don't ask what your next step is. KeithP has told you.
appeal as the keeper or driver (which ever you did in the original appeal) and just say this
The driver (or keeper) never left site whilst parked here, the operator has provided no evidence of the keeper (or driver) leaving site and the burden of proof lies on the operator to prove their case.
Thats it and see what happens.....6 -
Nice one. well done!1
-
Leaving site charges are almost impossible for thetm, and the IAS cant afford to kangaroo court those obvious motorst should win appeals right now. It would be an obvious complaint and then bring it to MP if they did.3
-
Well done. It would be interesting to see what the adjudicator said. May help others.
Nolite te bast--des carborundorum.0 -
I suspect the only thing the adjudicator said was to the PPC - "Drop it, you've no chance with a 'leaving the site' case with an appellant who's spotted the scam"!Snakes_Belly said:Well done. It would be interesting to see what the adjudicator said. May help others.Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street3 -
good that PPC user who posted on here wont be happytopley4718 said:
The IAS appeal worked and the charge has been cancelled, thanks for the advice folks.BrownTrout said:
Write this, keep it simpletopley4718 said:
Do I just write it as simply as that or is their a template.BrownTrout said:
for this site/type of case though i would appeal to the IAS , just deny leaving site and state there is no evidence of this, and then see what they come back with (or if they concede etc...)Coupon-mad said:You already know from the NEWBIES thread, and every other UKCPS thread you read...not to try the kangaroo court.
Please don't ask what your next step is. KeithP has told you.
appeal as the keeper or driver (which ever you did in the original appeal) and just say this
The driver (or keeper) never left site whilst parked here, the operator has provided no evidence of the keeper (or driver) leaving site and the burden of proof lies on the operator to prove their case.
Thats it and see what happens.....4 -
Cancelled as a "Gesture of goodwill" orSnakes_Belly said:Well done. It would be interesting to see what the adjudicator said. May help others.
due to "Receipt of further information" will be guesses.4 -
Don't , I am crying into a box of Kleenex at the thought of a PPC Sc#mm£r stooge being unhappy !!BrownTrout said:
good that PPC user who posted on here wont be happytopley4718 said:
The IAS appeal worked and the charge has been cancelled, thanks for the advice folks.BrownTrout said:
Write this, keep it simpletopley4718 said:
Do I just write it as simply as that or is their a template.BrownTrout said:
for this site/type of case though i would appeal to the IAS , just deny leaving site and state there is no evidence of this, and then see what they come back with (or if they concede etc...)Coupon-mad said:You already know from the NEWBIES thread, and every other UKCPS thread you read...not to try the kangaroo court.
Please don't ask what your next step is. KeithP has told you.
appeal as the keeper or driver (which ever you did in the original appeal) and just say this
The driver (or keeper) never left site whilst parked here, the operator has provided no evidence of the keeper (or driver) leaving site and the burden of proof lies on the operator to prove their case.
Thats it and see what happens.....5 -
As a gesture of goodwill, send them an LBA
https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/law-and-courts/legal-system/small-claims/making-a-small-claim/
You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0 -
Glad to hear it and I concede I was wrong not to t4ry the kangaroo court! Well done you, please show us the rationale.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards