NCP parking ticket- I won!

Jenni_D

Site is blocked for me on my work laptop. (That's my problem, not yours). Just a question though ... you have redacted any personal details in there, yes?

Le_Kirk

Links do work.

Jenni_D

And they work for me on my own laptop.
And the docs have been redacted.

Key takeaways from the first image:
1. Advise the court (only) of your email and phone number for the hearing right now. (It says within 48 hours of receiving the order)
2. Submit your defence bundle to the court and the Claimant no later than 7 days before the hearing date

Image 2: talks about application costs, but the top of it is not too clear. Is there something missing between image 1 and image 2?

Image 3: Seems to be your original application being accepted, and has led to the latest order.

Eminowa

Image 2. Missing bit is "if you wish to adjourn the above hearing,  you must either
A) file a format application to the court with a fees of £275
obtain the written consent of the other party ......"
I have emailed telephone number and email address to the court yesterday.
So we still have to resubmit our defence again?  Is it that d case is starting afresh again?
Who will be paying hearing fees, as the lady said from the court, that we don't have to pay anything.

Eminowa

This seem to me like the court is angry, n wants to hear the case without bwlegal running off like they just did

Coupon-mad

So we still have to resubmit our defence again?  

It doesn't say that and we didn't say that.  This hearing is not about the PCN.

Eminowa

Jenni_D said:

And they work for me on my own laptop.
And the docs have been redacted.

Key takeaways from the first image:
1. Advise the court (only) of your email and phone number for the hearing right now. (It says within 48 hours of receiving the order)
2. Submit your defence bundle to the court and the Claimant no later than 7 days before the hearing date

Image 2: talks about application costs, but the top of it is not too clear. Is there something missing between image 1 and image 2?

Image 3: Seems to be your original application being accepted, and has led to the latest order.

@Coupon-mad, Jenni-d said i should submit defence as well. So what do i submit as my bundle pls?

Eminowa

Coupon-mad said:

So we still have to resubmit our defence again?  

It doesn't say that and we didn't say that.  This hearing is not about the PCN.

So what do i submit please as my bundle? Just my cost again or what?

Coupon-mad

If it is only a costs hearing it's your costs and a WS like this one: 

Premier Park Ltd ordered to pay £500 in costs for unreasonable late discontinuance at Southampton County Court (includes all orders and judgment transcript following his application for a costs hearing:  Premier Park v S Jones):

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6271727/residential-pcn-premier-park-ltd-ordered-to-pay-500-in-costs-at-southampton-county-court

The letter to the Judge asking for costs is interesting; it was treated as an 'application' by the Court:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/pjuljss3bo0totu/04%20C%20TWIMC%20%2B%20Costs%20Hearing%20Legal%20Arguement.pdf?dl=0

The OP said:
"The 05 Witness Statement is interesting and quotes a post from this forum. The statement by Mr Byers-Nolan was riddled with errors and inconsistencies, ignored the main points of the case and was delivered so late that the Judge ignored it. As he did with my skeleton argument…

 
You might think I would be steaming with anger with PP, BW Legal, DRP, Gladstones, CST Law, Zenith Collections et al, but no. If POPLA are going to boast on their website that they take “into consideration the relevant law, guidance and standards and the BPA Code of Practice.” they should do exactly that. Don’t employ someone with experience of “conflict resolution” and “problem solving” to decide on points of law. How about employing someone with a legal background to decide on legal matters? The new Government CoP will hopefully remove POPLA from the equation.

And finally, for the Premier Park Ltd and BW Legal employees who lurk on this forum: we still have a BIG problem with the other 24 PCNs you plastered my vehicles with, don’t we?"

Eminowa

@Coupon-mad. Thanks for this information.
So basically the court would ask my wife why she thinks the parking coy should pay her cost ?