The Forum is currently experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Private Landlords

12345679»

Comments

  • Grumpy_chap
    Grumpy_chap Posts: 18,079 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Personally, benefits must be as good as not benefits.  I mean, if you are only receiving benefits but can still afford the rent, it is not as though you can lose your job or something.  It is the insurers that impose the restriction as they won't cover the rent if there is any benefits involved.
  • Jeremy535897
    Jeremy535897 Posts: 10,732 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    Having seen the number of times a council can issue two letters on the same day to a landlord, one saying that the payment for a property will be £200 a week, and the next saying the payment will be nil, I am not surprised that insurers are cautious.
  • Galloglass
    Galloglass Posts: 1,288 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    The court case that @Jeremy535897 referred to earlier is a lower court decision. It is seen a persuasive but not binding on other courts. You do get some hype with these cases which are termed as a breakthrough or ground-breaking but in reality a landlord can choose who they want as tenants. There is a risk of a blow back but until, as has been suggested earlier, the insurance companies reflect the ground-breaking case then it is [discriminatory] business as usual.
    • All land is owned. If you are not on yours, you are on someone else's
    • When on someone else's be it a road, a pavement, a right of way or a property there are rules. Don't assume there are none.
    • "Free parking" doesn't mean free of rules. Check the rules and if you don't like them, go elsewhere
    • All land is owned. If you are not on yours, you are on someone else's and their rules apply.
    Just visiting - back in 2025
  • justwhat
    justwhat Posts: 723 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    The court case that @Jeremy535897 referred to earlier is a lower court decision. It is seen a persuasive but not binding on other courts. You do get some hype with these cases which are termed as a breakthrough or ground-breaking but in reality a landlord can choose who they want as tenants. There is a risk of a blow back but until, as has been suggested earlier, the insurance companies reflect the ground-breaking case then it is [discriminatory] business as usual.
    its stupid and long term it will make things worse and is just  deflecting from the real problem.
    If NO DSS gets made illegal then LL's will stipulate an affordability check. 
    This whole situation regarding social house , has been made worse by the government stopping housing benefit going straight to the landlord.  They no longer have good housing stock and are attempting to force landlords to provide social housing.
    Already many LL do an affordability check.  You will see Affordability checks more common place in the private rental market in the coming years, 


  • Galloglass
    Galloglass Posts: 1,288 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 3 September 2020 at 7:59AM
    They no longer have good housing stock and are attempting to force landlords to provide social housing.
    Social Landlords, the ones that have taken over council housing, have access to and use a wide variety of credit/affordability checks. It is in their interest to have tenants who can afford the rent and will be long term residents. It is called being professional.

    Private landlords that can't run a business to a certain level, should not be in business. No point in blaming the tenants for the shortcomings in the business model.
    • All land is owned. If you are not on yours, you are on someone else's
    • When on someone else's be it a road, a pavement, a right of way or a property there are rules. Don't assume there are none.
    • "Free parking" doesn't mean free of rules. Check the rules and if you don't like them, go elsewhere
    • All land is owned. If you are not on yours, you are on someone else's and their rules apply.
    Just visiting - back in 2025
  • justwhat
    justwhat Posts: 723 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    They no longer have good housing stock and are attempting to force landlords to provide social housing.

    Private landlords that can't run a business to a certain level, should not be in business. No point in blaming the tenants for the shortcomings in the business model.
    Many agencies and private landlords can and do affordability checks.  These harder checks have come about over the years due do some of the changes the council and the government have made. Its a perfectly good business model until manipulated by government  and councils. Ultimately/long term  the tenant will loose out .
  • Grumpy_chap
    Grumpy_chap Posts: 18,079 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    The real issue is that private landlords seek to manage their business risk by insuring and the insurers will not allow DSS.  If the insurers change their policy terms, Landlords will be happy to let anyone who can pay rent.
  • justwhat said:
    The court case that @Jeremy535897 referred to earlier is a lower court decision. It is seen a persuasive but not binding on other courts. You do get some hype with these cases which are termed as a breakthrough or ground-breaking but in reality a landlord can choose who they want as tenants. There is a risk of a blow back but until, as has been suggested earlier, the insurance companies reflect the ground-breaking case then it is [discriminatory] business as usual.
    its stupid and long term it will make things worse and is just  deflecting from the real problem.
    If NO DSS gets made illegal then LL's will stipulate an affordability check. 
    This whole situation regarding social house , has been made worse by the government stopping housing benefit going straight to the landlord.  They no longer have good housing stock and are attempting to force landlords to provide social housing.
    Already many LL do an affordability check.  You will see Affordability checks more common place in the private rental market in the coming years, 


    There's already affordability checks - but it's much simpler than that. 
    Don't want a DSS tenant? Just ask all applications to include income details, and bin the ones that include benefits. 

    Not something I'd do, not even something I'd endorse but there's zero way this can be enforced. 
    As I've said before, my DSS tenants were lovely. 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.7K Life & Family
  • 256.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.