We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Mother-in-law and money

1246721

Comments

  • MalMonroe
    MalMonroe Posts: 5,783 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    macman said:
    If she has a income of £8k plus p.a. and only pays you £1K, then I suppose that you could take the long view that, unless she is spending it all, then your wife's inheritance is accumulating by an additional £7Kpa....
    But £1K wouldn't have covered the costs ten or twenty years ago. Even if you are content for her to live rent-free, then your council tax and utility bills split 3 ways would cost more than that.
    Does she contribute to food bills etc?
    She won't have an income of £8k plus pa at all. I don't know where that rumour started. It'll be far less than £7k pa. And she'll have clothes and shoes to buy, birthday and Christmas gifts, toiletries etc. According to OP she doesn't contribute to food bills, no. IMO she'd be better off living alone because she'd be entitled to all the pension credits and housing benefits, etc. She'd be even wealthier then. 


    Please note - taken from the Forum Rules and amended for my own personal use (with thanks) : It is up to you to investigate, check, double-check and check yet again before you make any decisions or take any action based on any information you glean from any of my posts. Although I do carry out careful research before posting and never intend to mislead or supply out-of-date or incorrect information, please do not rely 100% on what you are reading. Verify everything in order to protect yourself as you are responsible for any action you consequently take.
  • JReacher1
    JReacher1 Posts: 4,663 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper I've been Money Tipped!
    Should really be down to your wife I would have thought. She must be aware of your financial situation and if she doesn’t want to charge more rent off her own mother then that seems the end of the matter. I don’t really know what else you can do? Would you throw your MIL out when your wife doesn’t want to charge her more either?

    Personally my view on things like this is your MIL raised your wife till probably about age 18 without charging her rent. Now in her advance years your wife is returning the favour so I don’t think charging her £100 a week is really reasonable. 
  • Sea_Shell
    Sea_Shell Posts: 10,056 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I think you all need to sit down as a household, and really look at the real costs of running the house together, so everyone can see what the actual costs are now.   Then hopefully once all the figures are there in black and white (or highlighted in red!) you are able to get an agreement for an increase in keep, along with a schedule of review (every 6 months eg)

    I also agree that as for the "inheritance" that's just words in the wind at the moment...could be gone (spent), could be left to someone else, and so on.   Do not rely on it coming your way.

    So in the meantime, some of it needs to be paid into the household coffers.
    How's it going, AKA, Nutwatch? - 12 month spends to date = 2.60% of current retirement "pot" (as at end May 2025)
  • JReacher1
    JReacher1 Posts: 4,663 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper I've been Money Tipped!
    elsien said:
    JReacher1 said:
    Should really be down to your wife I would have thought. She must be aware of your financial situation and if she doesn’t want to charge more rent off her own mother then that seems the end of the matter. I don’t really know what else you can do? Would you throw your MIL out when your wife doesn’t want to charge her more either

    Personally my view on things like this is your MIL raised your wife till probably about age 18 without charging her rent. Now in her advance years your wife is returning the favour so I don’t think charging her £100 a week is really reasonable. 
    Completely different situations - of course MIL didn't charge her children rent. It's not like they chose to be born and to live with her, is it? She wasn't doing them a favour by not charging rent, she was being a parent and raising the children she chose to have with all the obligations that entails.  
    Whereas MIL is a fully fledged adult with her own finances who has now, for whatever reason, chosen to live with family.  They've been subsidising her with varying degrees of willingness for 10 years. Now money is tight. Why would she not be asked contribute more? £19 a week is rather taking the proverbial.
    I don’t agree £19 a week is taking the proverbial. Compared to commercial rents it would be very low but this situation is not comparable to that.  Most bills in the house won’t be much higher because there is a third adult in the house so personally I think charging £100 a week would be taking the proverbial and allowing the OP to profit from his wife’s mother by taking a large chunk of her weekly state pension. 

    I’ll go back to what I said before his wife doesn’t want to charge anymore so there isn’t much he can do. 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.