BW Legal court date received for case against Premier Park

jacksparrow2000

Coupon-mad said:

Don't say: '16 The driver did not acknowledge the signage' !

And this is the wrong statement of truth (Google the new April 2020 version but it IS already in the NEWBIES thred stated very clearly not to use this old statement):

I believe that the facts stated in this Witness Statement are true

Thanks again Coupon mad you must be owed alot of drinks 

Coupon-mad

Awwww...it's a virtual white wine spritzer for this lady please!

jacksparrow2000

Coupon-mad said:

Awwww...it's a virtual white wine spritzer for this lady please!

If you tell me how ill send one over

Just to put a spanner in the works ive just been told i might have to go away tomorrow for work for 3 weeks so i will miss the deadline! Im in a rush now to sort and send everything by tomorrow! 

jacksparrow2000

jacksparrow2000 said:

Umkomaas said:

If the NtK was from a couple of years ago, it may not have been compliant then (unless we see it, we can't be sure). Have you sent them a SAR?  That will dig it out. So meantime, work on the basis that it wasn't compliant and argue no keeper liability, it won't be fatal to your position even if they did comply. See if you can get the SAR response In sufficient time, but they do have 30 days by law to respond; but note that they won't be marching to the beat of your own drum.

Thanks, I have just sent them an SAR. I think ill be lucky to receive it in time, time will tell i guess.

I finally received the SAR! Too late to be of use and not sure if youre interested but ive uploaded it FYA.
Interestingly on the same day another letter from BW Legal offering 40% discount on the balance of £274.92 if paid before 11th July! The hearing scheduled for the 16th so ill let you know the outcome. Thanks.

Castle

You've left the VRM and the PCN reference showing.

nosferatu1001

Good confirmation that teh NtK doesnt  comply with POFA2012. Warning of liability gives the wrong period. 

jacksparrow2000

Just had the ruling through. Unforunately i lost and ordered to pay £100 plus interest and costs so total £205.23.
Probably my fault for not seeking advice sooner, lesson learnt.
Judge said signs were clear and state the terms and that I was free to leave within the grace period!
Thanks anyway.

Umkomaas

Sorry for the loss. Was this a face-to-face, video link, telephone, or simply an 'on the papers' only hearing?  How did the costs awarded over the £100 PCN break down please?

beamerguy

This is what we call Judge bingo.  Keep an eye on this forum about BWLegal, you will see a lot more court spankings that as yet, they know nothing about

nosferatu1001

Given the way the op,delivered it,I'm guessing this was papers 
a big mistake. No doubt the ppc sent w "plan" of signs, a mock-up and the op couldn't challenge it.