One Parking Solution warned by a Judge that they may face an application for a civil restraint order

beamerguy

Snakes_Belly said:

"Funny how the original judgement made by a DEPUTY district judge was celebrated by you guys, but a ruling made by his superior highlighting that he didn’t have a clue at best; or was abusing his position at worst is meaningless"
 
Meaningless in the context that the PPC's are going the same way as the dinosaurs, extinct. Meaningless when looking at the bigger picture.

It is an ill conceived idea with parking companies that winning an appeal and complaining about a judge will be a golden ticket for them.  Those who think with blinkered eyes will be highly disappointed  and clearly fail to understand the reality of life.

I wonder how they think that complaining about the judiciary will help, it will not as we are now seeing judges dig deeper and pull out the flaws of the claims.
In real life (which PPC's don't live in) if you want to achieve something, you never bite the hand of those who you want to feed you. The judiciary is a closed shop

This week we have probably seen the start of something that all judges should do. 
That is the court order from Oxford CC asking very loaded questions to a claimant who has already signed a statement of truth. We all know the route this is taking.

Recently, I spoke to a DDJ who has been very good to defendants. His answer was "I am here to see justice done" ... that is the clue with these dodgy claims and appeals will serve little purpose as Judges will turn a different corner.
That has been the result from the Salisbury appeal which as it turns out was rather a waste of time

BrownTrout

AnotherForumite said:

beamerguy said:

AnotherForumite said:

beamerguy said:

AnotherForumite said:

beamerguy said:

AnotherForumite said:

How did the appeal go @Coupon-mad?

You don't know ?   there are certain things only for certain eyes only ?  Did not see you on the list

Yes, I am aware that One Parking won their appeal 😊 I was just giving a nudge for the thread to be updated accordingly so readers are not mislead 😉

Oh the other list ... so you will know that means nothing. What is misleading is a parking company who is still yet to declare to MSE who they are

Funny how the original judgement made by a DEPUTY district judge was celebrated by you guys, but a ruling made by his superior highlighting that he didn’t have a clue at best; or was abusing his position at worst is meaningless 🤣

But you do know that judge bingo within the county court system is part of the county court system.
Today's fish and chip paper is in the bin tomorrow.
Do declare yourself to MSE, 

Maybe in an initial hearing, especially with DDJ; but the judgement is usually sound at appeal stage.

I have nothing to declare, I am not representing a company; hence why I have not stated any affiliation.

Looks like @AnotherForumite has seen something that other parties haven't.

AnotherForumite

BrownTrout said:

AnotherForumite said:

beamerguy said:

AnotherForumite said:

beamerguy said:

AnotherForumite said:

beamerguy said:

AnotherForumite said:

How did the appeal go @Coupon-mad?

You don't know ?   there are certain things only for certain eyes only ?  Did not see you on the list

Yes, I am aware that One Parking won their appeal 😊 I was just giving a nudge for the thread to be updated accordingly so readers are not mislead 😉

Oh the other list ... so you will know that means nothing. What is misleading is a parking company who is still yet to declare to MSE who they are

Funny how the original judgement made by a DEPUTY district judge was celebrated by you guys, but a ruling made by his superior highlighting that he didn’t have a clue at best; or was abusing his position at worst is meaningless 🤣

But you do know that judge bingo within the county court system is part of the county court system.
Today's fish and chip paper is in the bin tomorrow.
Do declare yourself to MSE, 

Maybe in an initial hearing, especially with DDJ; but the judgement is usually sound at appeal stage.

I have nothing to declare, I am not representing a company; hence why I have not stated any affiliation.

Looks like @AnotherForumite has seen something that other parties haven't.

That depends on whether you have read the 40 page appeal judgment or not... I have 😊

BrownTrout

AnotherForumite said:

BrownTrout said:

AnotherForumite said:

beamerguy said:

AnotherForumite said:

beamerguy said:

AnotherForumite said:

beamerguy said:

AnotherForumite said:

How did the appeal go @Coupon-mad?

You don't know ?   there are certain things only for certain eyes only ?  Did not see you on the list

Yes, I am aware that One Parking won their appeal 😊 I was just giving a nudge for the thread to be updated accordingly so readers are not mislead 😉

Oh the other list ... so you will know that means nothing. What is misleading is a parking company who is still yet to declare to MSE who they are

Funny how the original judgement made by a DEPUTY district judge was celebrated by you guys, but a ruling made by his superior highlighting that he didn’t have a clue at best; or was abusing his position at worst is meaningless 🤣

But you do know that judge bingo within the county court system is part of the county court system.
Today's fish and chip paper is in the bin tomorrow.
Do declare yourself to MSE, 

Maybe in an initial hearing, especially with DDJ; but the judgement is usually sound at appeal stage.

I have nothing to declare, I am not representing a company; hence why I have not stated any affiliation.

Looks like @AnotherForumite has seen something that other parties haven't.

That depends on whether you have read the 40 page appeal judgment or not... I have 😊

i wouldn't get to excited

AnotherForumite

There’s nothing exciting about parking law, although I appreciate that some dedicate a lot of their spare time to it (each to their own I guess).

Jenni_D

AnotherForumite said:

There’s nothing exciting about parking law, although I appreciate that some dedicate a lot of their spare time to it (each to their own I guess).

I guess some people have a community spirit and mindset, and wish to work for the benefit of Joe Public.

Whereas others are mean-spirited and only think of fleecing Joe Public to bolster their bank balances.

Was that what you were meaning?

nosferatu1001

Indeed, and take great joy in doing so, because the parking firms contribute nothing positive
Sooner they are defunct, the better

beamerguy

I do hope that this spat will not waste any more reading time.  I will say though, this OP denies he is a parking company yet many posts ago he said he signs the claims ?

My question is, are these claims the ones that attract the bumble rent a droid who is sent to court?

Jenni_D

FYI - you're using the expression OP incorrectly. It means Original Poster or Original Post ... the poster in question didn't originate this thread - you did.

beamerguy

Jenni_D said:

FYI - you're using the expression OP incorrectly. It means Original Poster or Original Post ... the poster in question didn't originate this thread - you did.

OH ?   I did not realise you were a teacher. But for your information the thread was started by coupon-mad .... not me .... you don't get an apple this time