Members of Tribunal removed main document from case causing delays & expenses - expense claim

Spank

k3lvc said:

Reported - sure it’s not the first deleted post the OO has

I hope not, I miss a good "Nutter" thread, I know it's not the subway or shell garage thread, but beggars can't be choosers

PeterHook

Spank said:

k3lvc said:

Reported - sure it’s not the first deleted post the OO has

I hope not, I miss a good "Nutter" thread, I know it's not the subway or shell garage thread, but beggars can't be choosers

I can only confirm :  beggars in my case are unlawful people working in HMCTS, CICA and Police since they owe me important amount of money due to their criminal acts (important financial losses).

The beggars equally tried after the assault on me (and until present) to take over my small company...

Too much losers I'm telling you!!!

MoneySavingNovice

PeterHook said:

MoneySavingNovice said:

PeterHook said:

MoneySavingNovice said:

You have been asked a number of pertinent questions, so the full picture can be understood in order to assess the options you have available and give you a helpful reply.  As you have refused to answer such questions how do you conceive that anyone here will be able to give you any support?

I may have a suggestion on what you could do,  but I would need the answer the question of why the tribunal had decided not to consider the document which you clearly think is key.  You need to go and find that information out because that is the key to establishing if you have any case at all.

I answered above...apparently at the same time you posted.

True this was posted at the same time however your answer explained what it was that was removed not the reasons for why it was removed. 

Put it another way,  it's possible that they considered it inadmissible evidence?

If that's the case on what basis did they consider it inadmissible?

There is a guide here which might help you with what is admissible:-

https://www.inbrief.co.uk/court-proceedings/evidence/

I believe a written statement in a print of email is a real evidence.

No, you may believe that but the Tribunals will consider all aspects before reaching a conclusion.

If you are unable to answer the question of why the Tribunal did not consider the evidence you provided this in effect means that you don't have an argument on which to base any appeal.

Therefore based upon what you have said here in my view you don't have any evidence to support your claim that the there were any unlawful acts by members of the Tribunal, and you are also unable to demonstrate that the finding of the tribunal is in any way incorrect.

So to answer your question  "....if I can claim a refund for expenses (hostel) to the tribunal."  is a No. 

PeterHook

MoneySavingNovice said:

PeterHook said:

MoneySavingNovice said:

PeterHook said:

MoneySavingNovice said:

You have been asked a number of pertinent questions, so the full picture can be understood in order to assess the options you have available and give you a helpful reply.  As you have refused to answer such questions how do you conceive that anyone here will be able to give you any support?

I may have a suggestion on what you could do,  but I would need the answer the question of why the tribunal had decided not to consider the document which you clearly think is key.  You need to go and find that information out because that is the key to establishing if you have any case at all.

I answered above...apparently at the same time you posted.

True this was posted at the same time however your answer explained what it was that was removed not the reasons for why it was removed. 

Put it another way,  it's possible that they considered it inadmissible evidence?

If that's the case on what basis did they consider it inadmissible?

There is a guide here which might help you with what is admissible:-

https://www.inbrief.co.uk/court-proceedings/evidence/

I believe a written statement in a print of email is a real evidence.

No, you may believe that but the Tribunals will consider all aspects before reaching a conclusion.

If you are unable to answer the question of why the Tribunal did not consider the evidence you provided this in effect means that you don't have an argument on which to base any appeal.

Therefore based upon what you have said here in my view you don't have any evidence to support your claim that the there were any unlawful acts by members of the Tribunal, and you are also unable to demonstrate that the finding of the tribunal is in any way incorrect.

So to answer your question  "....if I can claim a refund for expenses (hostel) to the tribunal."  is a No. 

Sincerely,you just made me laugh because for you it is me who have to  explain the reason there are corrupt people working even in Tribunals. They should have shown the document/evidence they have removed to the Judge...but this last would have to say the Law...and since the Judge didn't see the obvious/real evidence (removed) he just said a BENT Law...

waamo

Is this about being thrown out of the band?

PeterHook

waamo said:

Is this about being thrown out of the band?

Implicitly yes...I assume....

I will come back tomorrow in case this thread still open.

Guys make an effort...Be a minimum brave to say the truth at least virtually...

Hint : Brexit, discrimination, r........

sheramber

PeterHook said:

DoaM said:

Your question is not one of consumer rights. To take this further you need legal advice ... perhaps see if you have a local solicitor with suitable experience who might do a free 30 minute consultancy? Or contact CAB for an appointment to discuss this? It is highly unlikely that anyone on this board will be able to give you the advice that you need. (Anyone can give you the advice that you want, but that won't necessarily be helpful).

You may don't know but all CAB and most lawyers firm are presently closed due to the pandemic crisis. I contacted one remotely for a small fee (30 minutes) but he didn't answer accurately to my questions.

It will also be fine by me with anyone advice since I will cross examine their advice with the UK law.

Cheers.

If UK law has the answer then why not consult  that rather than ask anonymous members in an internet forum?

MoneySavingNovice

PeterHook said:

MoneySavingNovice said:

PeterHook said:

MoneySavingNovice said:

PeterHook said:

MoneySavingNovice said:

You have been asked a number of pertinent questions, so the full picture can be understood in order to assess the options you have available and give you a helpful reply.  As you have refused to answer such questions how do you conceive that anyone here will be able to give you any support?

I may have a suggestion on what you could do,  but I would need the answer the question of why the tribunal had decided not to consider the document which you clearly think is key.  You need to go and find that information out because that is the key to establishing if you have any case at all.

I answered above...apparently at the same time you posted.

True this was posted at the same time however your answer explained what it was that was removed not the reasons for why it was removed. 

Put it another way,  it's possible that they considered it inadmissible evidence?

If that's the case on what basis did they consider it inadmissible?

There is a guide here which might help you with what is admissible:-

https://www.inbrief.co.uk/court-proceedings/evidence/

I believe a written statement in a print of email is a real evidence.

No, you may believe that but the Tribunals will consider all aspects before reaching a conclusion.

If you are unable to answer the question of why the Tribunal did not consider the evidence you provided this in effect means that you don't have an argument on which to base any appeal.

Therefore based upon what you have said here in my view you don't have any evidence to support your claim that the there were any unlawful acts by members of the Tribunal, and you are also unable to demonstrate that the finding of the tribunal is in any way incorrect.

So to answer your question  "....if I can claim a refund for expenses (hostel) to the tribunal."  is a No. 

Sincerely,you just made me laugh because for you it is me who have to  explain the reason there are corrupt people working even in Tribunals. They should have shown the document/evidence they have removed to the Judge...but this last would have to say the Law...and since the Judge didn't see the obvious/real evidence (removed) he just said a BENT Law...

You have already made it clear that you can't or won't take the advice provided here or even answer basic questions.

You have already said that you can't find a solicitor to take on your case on a no win no fee basis.

You have also intimated that you have no money, at least not the amount you would need to appeal to the Supreme Court who is the only court which can set the precedent you require.

It appears to me that all avenues forward are blocked for you, so just out of interest what are you going to do now?

stragglebod

I'm guessing we all work for the CICA tribunal then? Out of interest, who manages to get their salary paid? Of all these companies that I'm told I work for, none of them ever seem to pay up.

greyteam1959

What a ridiculous waste of everybody's time and effort this thread is.
Is it for real ???