Members of Tribunal removed main document from case causing delays & expenses - expense claim

MoneySavingNovice

You have been asked a number of pertinent questions, so the full picture can be understood in order to assess the options you have available and give you a helpful reply.  As you have refused to answer such questions how do you conceive that anyone here will be able to give you any support?

I may have a suggestion on what you could do,  but I would need the answer the question of why the tribunal had decided not to consider the document which you clearly think is key.  You need to go and find that information out because that is the key to establishing if you have any case at all.

PeterHook

MoneySavingNovice said:

You have been asked a number of pertinent questions, so the full picture can be understood in order to assess the options you have available and give you a helpful reply.  As you have refused to answer such questions how do you conceive that anyone here will be able to give you any support?

I may have a suggestion on what you could do,  but I would need the answer the question of why the tribunal had decided not to consider the document which you clearly think is key.  You need to go and find that information out because that is the key to establishing if you have any case at all.

I answered above...apparently at the same time you posted.
Now, let see how many of you are going to contribute after the read the word "police"...

Aylesbury_Duck

About as many as can be bothered with your tiresome riddles and insinuations, I expect. 

PeterHook

Aylesbury_Duck said:

About as many as can be bothered with your tiresome riddles and insinuations, I expect. 

I'm not surprised by your "contribution"...

MoneySavingNovice

PeterHook said:

MoneySavingNovice said:

You have been asked a number of pertinent questions, so the full picture can be understood in order to assess the options you have available and give you a helpful reply.  As you have refused to answer such questions how do you conceive that anyone here will be able to give you any support?

I may have a suggestion on what you could do,  but I would need the answer the question of why the tribunal had decided not to consider the document which you clearly think is key.  You need to go and find that information out because that is the key to establishing if you have any case at all.

I answered above...apparently at the same time you posted.

True this was posted at the same time however your answer explained what it was that was removed not the reasons for why it was removed. 

Put it another way,  it's possible that they considered it inadmissible evidence?

If that's the case on what basis did they consider it inadmissible?

There is a guide here which might help you with what is admissible:-

https://www.inbrief.co.uk/court-proceedings/evidence/

k3lvc

PeterHook said:

MoneySavingNovice said:

You have been asked a number of pertinent questions, so the full picture can be understood in order to assess the options you have available and give you a helpful reply.  As you have refused to answer such questions how do you conceive that anyone here will be able to give you any support?

I may have a suggestion on what you could do,  but I would need the answer the question of why the tribunal had decided not to consider the document which you clearly think is key.  You need to go and find that information out because that is the key to establishing if you have any case at all.

I answered above...apparently at the same time you posted.
Now, let see how many of you are going to contribute after the read the word "police"...

Given your attitude there’s certainly unlikely to be any helpful replies to you 😉

Aylesbury_Duck

PeterHook said:

Aylesbury_Duck said:

About as many as can be bothered with your tiresome riddles and insinuations, I expect. 

I'm not surprised by your "contribution"...

Well three full pages (so far) and you're still no closer to an answer you want. I think that says a lot about how you've dealt with the thread so far, doesn't it  

PeterHook

MoneySavingNovice said:

PeterHook said:

MoneySavingNovice said:

You have been asked a number of pertinent questions, so the full picture can be understood in order to assess the options you have available and give you a helpful reply.  As you have refused to answer such questions how do you conceive that anyone here will be able to give you any support?

I may have a suggestion on what you could do,  but I would need the answer the question of why the tribunal had decided not to consider the document which you clearly think is key.  You need to go and find that information out because that is the key to establishing if you have any case at all.

I answered above...apparently at the same time you posted.

True this was posted at the same time however your answer explained what it was that was removed not the reasons for why it was removed. 

Put it another way,  it's possible that they considered it inadmissible evidence?

If that's the case on what basis did they consider it inadmissible?

There is a guide here which might help you with what is admissible:-

https://www.inbrief.co.uk/court-proceedings/evidence/

I believe a written statement in a print of email is a real evidence.

PeterHook

Aylesbury_Duck said:

PeterHook said:

Aylesbury_Duck said:

About as many as can be bothered with your tiresome riddles and insinuations, I expect. 

I'm not surprised by your "contribution"...

Well three full pages (so far) and you're still no closer to an answer you want. I think that says a lot about how you've dealt with the thread so far, doesn't it  

It just reflect the mentality of presently the majority of people...

Can you tell me why people are put in modern slavery in London despite of the numerous cameras and facial recognition in London? "No", I guess...

______________________

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/01/30/europe/modern-slavery-london-scli-intl/index.html

The UK has thousands of people in modern slavery -- and in London it's getting increasingly worse

By Rory Sullivan, CNN.

Updated 1652 GMT (0052 HKT) January 30, 2020

(CNN)The number of identified victims of modern slavery and human trafficking in London has risen more than tenfold in the space of five years, according to a new report which analyzes police data.

Data from London's Metropolitan Police shows a 1,154% increase in the number of recognized victims of modern slavery -- from 187 referrals in 2013 to 2,346 in 2018.

What is modern slavery?

More than 30% of the 5,143 people referred by the Home Office in 2017 for support were in London -- nearly three times higher than any other region or country in the UK, according to a letter from the London Assembly's police and crime committee.

In October, the Local Government Association said that the number of council referrals of suspected child victims of modern slavery in England had risen by 807% between 2014 and 2018.

London needs to have a "more coherent" strategy to tackle modern slavery and human trafficking, the London Assembly's police and crime committee said in a letter to the deputy mayor for policing and crime, Sophie Linden.

Young Vietnamese workers risking life and death on 'the line' to Europe

Unmesh Desai, chair of the committee, said in the letter: "The rise of modern slavery cases in London over the last five years shows that action is needed now."

The letter recommends a specific strategy is developed for the capital to improve its response to the problem.

It also recommends that the Home Office reforms the National Referral Mechanism (NRM), which is a process set up by the government to identify and support victims of trafficking.

UK's 'biggest modern slavery network had 400 victims'

Laura Durán, senior policy and research officer at Every Child Protected Against Trafficking, told CNN that despite a rising number of victims being identified, funding has not increased.

Durán said: "Austerity policies have weakened victim support and prevention work, leaving many destitute and vulnerable to further exploitation."

Patrick Ryan, chief executive of Hestia, a charity which supports victims of modern slavery in London, told CNN that one challenge was to address "failures in the training of frontline officers" -- which might put victims off going to the police.

The global slavery index for 2018 estimates there were 136,000 people in the UK living in modern slavery on any given day in 2016.

The assembly's letter comes just months after 39 Vietnamese people died in a lorry in Essex, England, in October.

k3lvc

Reported - sure it’s not the first deleted post the OP has