Ignored from day 1

apeshifter

Umkomaas said:

Lack of planning permission is not a showstopper for your case. It is pretty much irrelevant. Your Judge should it get to a hearing will, at best, tell you to take it up with the enforcing authority (the LA) and should they wish to enforce, they would need to issue proceedings. 

You're chasing shadows. 

Thanks. I understand it will not be a case killer but should it get to that point surely it would help with other factors (i.e. not being the driver, no restriction change clearly notified) towards my case

Umkomaas

apeshifter said:

Umkomaas said:

Lack of planning permission is not a showstopper for your case. It is pretty much irrelevant. Your Judge should it get to a hearing will, at best, tell you to take it up with the enforcing authority (the LA) and should they wish to enforce, they would need to issue proceedings. 

You're chasing shadows. 

surely it would help with other factors (i.e. not being the driver, no restriction change clearly notified) towards my case

Really?  How?

Le_Kirk

apeshifter said:

www2.ashfield.gov.uk/cfusion/Planning/plan_view_docs.cfm?reference=V/2011/0039
There are all the planning docs. No exceptions as far as I can see. Only approved signage which the CEL is not

That is the advertising consent and it ran for 5 years from 2011.  what is required is the planning application for the car park on the site.

apeshifter

I have been lead to believe  erecting advertisement signs and cameras without the councils planning permission is an offence, even if not prosecutable. I would of thought that this contravention to protocol would emphasise their lack of credibility as an enforcement agency.

apeshifter

Le_Kirk

That is the advertising consent and it ran for 5 years from 2011.  what is required is the planning application for the car park on the site.

www2.ashfield.gov.uk/cfusion/Planning/plan_history.cfm?reference=V%2F2011%2F0039

That is literally everything for the site. There are no records of the car park application online that I can find and before KFC it was wasteland after an ESSO garage shut down but thats going back some years

Redx

We wish that you could persuade a civil court on this , or better still a higher court , ask the BSI to include it as a requirement in the new Mhclg CoP too

Coupon-mad

 ask the BSI to include it as a requirement in the new Mhclg CoP too

Good idea, when it all gets put into action after lockdown.  Thre will be review and consultation.

Le_Kirk

apeshifter said:

Le_Kirk

That is the advertising consent and it ran for 5 years from 2011.  what is required is the planning application for the car park on the site.

www2.ashfield.gov.uk/cfusion/Planning/plan_history.cfm?reference=V%2F2011%2F0039
That is literally everything for the site. There are no records of the car park application online that I can find and before KFC it was wasteland after an ESSO garage shut down but thats going back some years

That new link does not work.  If it is not online, ask the council for it.
I note that you have now placed a scan of (looks like) an e-mail on the NEWBIE sticky, presumably you meant to post it here.  Having read it, it seems like a strange stance for a council planning dept to take.

apeshifter

so this was my reply from them. Appears its a free for all in this district. 

Le_Kirk

Might be worth asking the council what law, bye-law or regulation allows anyone to continue to use land upon which they have received planning permission to build WITH conditions and then, 7 years later, ignore the planning conditions.
Can you delete your post on the NEWBIE thread please?