One parking solution PCN

Le_Kirk

It's allude to something as in hint, point to, suggest.
It's elude something as escape from, avoid.

Scrapit

also point 2; as far as my uneducated eye can tell the NTK is legit and therefore this needs to be removed even if the point contained within is, to me at least wholly justified. Is this correct?

Scrapit

its elude cos i writ it. and its poor form to correct grammer whilst mispelling entrance,

Umkomaas

Scrapit said:

its elude cos i writ it. and its poor form to correct grammer whilst mispelling entrance,

Priceless.

Scrapit

Umkomaas said:

Scrapit said:

its elude cos i writ it. and its poor form to correct grammer whilst mispelling entrance,

Priceless.

Glad you liked it, the irony was certainly not lost on me. but to the case in hand, if we could?

Umkomaas

Scrapit said:

Umkomaas said:

Scrapit said:

its elude cos i writ it. and its poor form to correct grammer whilst mispelling entrance,

Priceless.

Glad you liked it, the irony was certainly not lost on me. but to the case in hand, if we could?

Quite a difference between an obvious typo and the use of a completely incorrect word!

Scrapit

Umkomaas said:

Scrapit said:

Umkomaas said:

Scrapit said:

its elude cos i writ it. and its poor form to correct grammer whilst mispelling entrance,

Priceless.

Glad you liked it, the irony was certainly not lost on me. but to the case in hand, if we could?

Quite a difference between an obvious typo and the use of a completely incorrect word!

irrelevant and pedentic none the less.
Theres some that cannot resist that bait. Go on, you want to. And prove my point in the process.

Umkomaas

I think you're doing a good job in winning over volunteers here.

Scrapit

Ok, impotent pedantry (is that a typo too )  aside, it appear that points 2, 4, and possibly 5 are not considered. Likewise point 6 as i currently understand it.
For clarity can i post a list of the points being made and enter a discussion on the validity of said points so i can concentrate on the relevant ones? Further to this, from the newbies guide, is the point to compile excessive pages as part of the appeal to dissuade the PPC from conntinuing or is this not the case?

My points are as follows:

1.       The entrance signs are inadequately positioned and lit and signs in this car park are not prominent, clear or legible from all parking spaces.

 

2.       The operator has not shown that the individual who it is pursuing is in fact the driver who may have been potentially liable for the charge.

 

3.       No evidence of Landowner Authority - the operator is put to strict proof of full compliance with the BPA Code of Practice.

 

4.       Failure to comply with the data protection ‘ICO Code of Practice’ applicable to ANPR.

 

5.       Vehicle Images contained in the PCN – Non-compliant to the BPA Code of Practice.

 

6.       No Evidence of Advertising Consent for Signage.

 

7.       No Grace Period Given (Clause #13 BPA Code of Practice) and the vehicle left within a very reasonable time.

Scrapit

Umkomaas said:

I think you're doing a good job in winning over volunteers here.

if they want to correct english in a forum rather than the task at hand is suspect they are not volunteers, just sad individuals looking for reward they will not receive from me.lets face it, its pointless and petty and seen across the the entire forum, not just this board.