We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Furlough is a farce!!
Comments
-
I posted earlier that I thought commission didn't come into the equation because if you are furloughed, you can't earn commission and would just be entitled to basic pay. Someone on a salary that is paid whether they work or not would still be contractually entitled to it if the employer told them to do nothing for a month.
However, you could apply exactly the same argument to zero hour contracts, but the Government chose to allow their pay to be calculated on a specific basis as set out in the guidance. I think this is unfair, but I will say that it shines a light on the practice of low basic high commission arrangements. OP has a lifestyle that takes into account an assumption that commission will be regular and sizeable. I think the Government assumption is that it is like an occasional bonus, but for many people it is clearly not.1 -
Jeremy535897 said:I posted earlier that I thought commission didn't come into the equation because if you are furloughed, you can't earn commission and would just be entitled to basic pay. Someone on a salary that is paid whether they work or not would still be contractually entitled to it if the employer told them to do nothing for a month.
However, you could apply exactly the same argument to zero hour contracts, but the Government chose to allow their pay to be calculated on a specific basis as set out in the guidance. I think this is unfair, but I will say that it shines a light on the practice of low basic high commission arrangements. OP has a lifestyle that takes into account an assumption that commission will be regular and sizeable. I think the Government assumption is that it is like an occasional bonus, but for many people it is clearly not.
i certainly do not expect to receive my full salary. If I was self employed I could evidence earnings and receive 80%. If I was salaried I would earn 80%.With regards to mortgage holidays it’s not a given that it will be offered and at the same time it can impact on your credit file. This has been advised against on this website if at all possible.0 -
I sympathise with you, but the only alternatives are that the company pays you more than they can recover, or they put a case to HMRC that some or all of your commission is really salary. Neither looks likely, but remember you have to agree to any variation in your contract that your employer wants and needs to have to furlough you. They could make you redundant of course, so your bargaining power is limited (although redundancy might be expensive for them). Company cars are a nuisance. If it is a big, expensive vehicle, see if they will take it back and stop it being available to you, and hire something small. There are complicated rules on car benefits that may cause a problem though. If you think this is only going to be for a month or two it might not be worth it.0
-
lhsmithy1973 said:Jeremy535897 said:I posted earlier that I thought commission didn't come into the equation because if you are furloughed, you can't earn commission and would just be entitled to basic pay. Someone on a salary that is paid whether they work or not would still be contractually entitled to it if the employer told them to do nothing for a month.
However, you could apply exactly the same argument to zero hour contracts, but the Government chose to allow their pay to be calculated on a specific basis as set out in the guidance. I think this is unfair, but I will say that it shines a light on the practice of low basic high commission arrangements. OP has a lifestyle that takes into account an assumption that commission will be regular and sizeable. I think the Government assumption is that it is like an occasional bonus, but for many people it is clearly not.
i certainly do not expect to receive my full salary. If I was self employed I could evidence earnings and receive 80%. If I was salaried I would earn 80%.With regards to mortgage holidays it’s not a given that it will be offered and at the same time it can impact on your credit file. This has been advised against on this website if at all possible.
What the government is giving you is what some people earn normally or even less. I believe it is very generous and some people are in far worse situations than you.0 -
lhsmithy1973 said:Jeremy535897 said:I posted earlier that I thought commission didn't come into the equation because if you are furloughed, you can't earn commission and would just be entitled to basic pay. Someone on a salary that is paid whether they work or not would still be contractually entitled to it if the employer told them to do nothing for a month.
However, you could apply exactly the same argument to zero hour contracts, but the Government chose to allow their pay to be calculated on a specific basis as set out in the guidance. I think this is unfair, but I will say that it shines a light on the practice of low basic high commission arrangements. OP has a lifestyle that takes into account an assumption that commission will be regular and sizeable. I think the Government assumption is that it is like an occasional bonus, but for many people it is clearly not.
i certainly do not expect to receive my full salary. If I was self employed I could evidence earnings and receive 80%. If I was salaried I would earn 80%.With regards to mortgage holidays it’s not a given that it will be offered and at the same time it can impact on your credit file. This has been advised against on this website if at all possible.
There are going to be millions of people falling through cracks for various reasons. The fact is, its a crappy situation and its a lottery as to whether you get anything and how much you get, based on numerous factors. No can tell you how you will survive, but simply that the system is what it is and you just need to get on with it.
I pay almost as much in tax as you earn in a year, I'm getting nothing and rightly so - on that sort of money I am expected be fine without any help (and I am), but I'll be paying for whatever help you get for years to come in increased taxation. I can understand why people earning less than you are questioning why you expected to just be good for ever and never thought you might need a rainy day fund.1 -
mobilejo said:lhsmithy1973 said:0
-
lopsyfa said:mobilejo said:lhsmithy1973 said:NCC-1707 said:Where are your savings guys? 40k - 55k is good money to be on and there should be a rainy day fund from it surely? Do you expect taxpayers like myself on less than 20k/year to fund you to a hIgher level than I'm earning?
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards