We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Advice needed on pay entitlement - can employer just stop pay in current circumstances
Comments
-
Not if the employer is operating as a sole trader as is the case here......Thrugelmir said:
If an employer becomes insolvent then employees have a right to claim unpaid wages, holiday pay, redundancy pay etc from the Government.Molly56 said:
Other than it has a direct impact on his ability to pay redundancy monies due so tend to disagree.....if he had sold the vehicle monies would have been available to pay his dues on termination of employment....if he leases it there will probably not be.Thrugelmir said:Unsure why you believe that the employer should discuss his business affairs with you. A totally seperate issue to that of the redundancy.0 -
It would if he went personally bankrupt.Molly56 said:
Not if the employer is operating as a sole trader as is the case here......Thrugelmir said:
If an employer becomes insolvent then employees have a right to claim unpaid wages, holiday pay, redundancy pay etc from the Government.Molly56 said:
Other than it has a direct impact on his ability to pay redundancy monies due so tend to disagree.....if he had sold the vehicle monies would have been available to pay his dues on termination of employment....if he leases it there will probably not be.Thrugelmir said:Unsure why you believe that the employer should discuss his business affairs with you. A totally seperate issue to that of the redundancy.0 -
Any thoughts as to why he is now asking for employee to sign standard terms of employment now (see query on previous page) when he has never had one in all of fifteen previous years of employment and now on the verge of leaving.........0
-
His solicitor told him to. So there's no argument about what the terms of employment are. That's clearly in both parties' best interests.Molly56 said:Any thoughts as to why he is now asking for employee to sign standard terms of employment now (see query on previous page) when he has never had one in all of fifteen previous years of employment and now on the verge of leaving.........
You're over-thinking this. Wait and see what the bit of paper says. If it's reasonable, sign it. If it's not, say so.
No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0 -
Employer has just said he is sending letter outlining redundancy ....will receive via email later.....but has verbally stated he can pay notice money (12 weeks at full pay) but NOT lump sum payment (15 years service)
Thinking we need to take serious advice now.....but where.......0 -
....don’t think Citizens advice can tell us anything we don’t already know......impossible to get through to ACAS, not even put in a queue.....considering solicitor but reluctant unless somehow we can recover costs......
....employer (sole trader) is claiming insolvency but is still planning to continue in business, currently planning to sign lease agreement to lease out vehicle and also to hold onto PSV operators licence to hopefully pick up work in the future.....
....as an employee unable to go to RPS as no insolvency practioner / case number to quote....
...just consolidating all info and evidence in preparation .....think we have a good case but just need to action it somehow0 -
See what the email says. If it offers no redundancy, then it may be the next step is an employment tribunal.0
-
Can Force Majeure be used as a get out clause for employer to get out of paying redundancy entitlement....letter from employer is suggesting he is relying on this....0
-
That is a legal question, but I think the answer must be no. When an employer cannot pay due to insolvency, the government steps in. If a force majeure clause meant the employer did not have to pay, the employee would be worse off than if the employer went bankrupt.0
-
Suppose you go to tribunal and win, that doesn’t mean you get paid. You still have to enforce the judgment. That could mean bankrupting someone your husband has worked with for 15 years. Plus, it’s rather an expensive process to bankrupt someone. I suggest not starting on this road unless you are absolutely sure you are prepared to complete the journey.
Just checked - it’s a £600 fee to file the bankruptcy papers.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.6K Life & Family
- 261.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

