We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Money Moral Dilemma: Should I keep the cash from selling the contents of our deceased dad's home?

MSE_Kelvin
MSE_Kelvin Posts: 451 MSE Staff
Eighth Anniversary 10 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
edited 3 March 2020 at 2:47PM in Deaths, funerals & probate
This week's MoneySaver who wants advice asks...

My father recently passed away and his house needs to be cleared so it can be sold. My sibling, who rarely visits, wants us to pay a company to dump everything. I regularly cared for my father, and want to sort through his home for what's worth saving or selling. Friends say I should keep any proceeds for myself, but should I split it with my sibling?

Unfortunately the MSE team can't always answer money moral dilemma questions as contributions are often emailed in or suggested in person. They are intended to be enjoyed as a point of debate and discussed at face value.

😲 If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply.
🙄 Got a Money Moral Dilemma of your own? Suggest an MMD.
«13456

Comments

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 35,383 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    What does the will say about the distribution of assets?

    If it says whoever sells his stuff first gets the cash, then its fine.  But that's not a very common clause.
  • SevenOfNine
    SevenOfNine Posts: 2,451 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    It is all part of the estate, just because you feel you can clear the house more economically yourself & make some money by selling things, doesn't make it right that you get to keep the proceeds.  Though I can understand why anyone might feel that way, is the key in the words "I regularly cared for my father" - does that indicate why you feel entitled to keep anything you can make as 'extra' from the estate?

    What does you sibling feel about your suggestion?  If you haven't told him/her then you know full well it's not right.  Transparency & honesty is the key to a quiet, friendly, wrapping up of an estate, anything underhand just leads to distrust & arguments. 
    Seen it all, done it all, can't remember most of it.
  • Malthusian
    Malthusian Posts: 11,055 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 3 March 2020 at 4:09PM
    If there is anything of value in the house this isn't a "moral dilemma" and it is irresponsible to portray it as such. It must be distributed as per the Will or intestacy laws.
    If, as is common, there is nothing of meaningful monetary value, the MoneySaver is free to take whatever trinkets they want, then leave the executor(s) to sort house clearance, the cost of which should be paid by the estate.
    They should probably also avoid asking their thieving friends for legal advice in the future.
  • Savvy_Sue
    Savvy_Sue Posts: 47,890 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    One thing is certain: DIY house clearance can be very slow and time-consuming. Meanwhile the house must be insured, council tax may be due (at higher than 100% rates once probate is granted?), utilities will be due. 

    Whether this represents a saving on a professional clearance service and a prompt sale is to my mind debatable. 

    What we paid was worth every last penny ... and that's before you think about the logistics of taking large items to the tip, because much of it won't be acceptable to charity shops etc.
    Signature removed for peace of mind
  • dysucker
    dysucker Posts: 45 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    Amazed this is even suggested as a moral dilemma topic, as it explicitly sounds like a legal dilemma topic.

    If you're selling contents of the deceased estate without having sole entitlement to it, then you're stealing from your sibling.

    What's to say you don't just become your own house clearance company, then charge your sibling for the privilege of removing and selling the contents ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    I'd say, ask your sibling if they care for any of the contents, and if not, you would like to take care of it, and any proceeds you make you will keep. If they disagree, then they should receive half of anything you've made since you did it without their express consent, and they're still entitled to half anyway.
  • However you decide to proceed, make sure you've got an email trail with your sibling and that everything is clearly stated. Sounds like, judging by the lack of contact, they can't be bothered and just want the contents sorted out and the property sold so probably won't object to you sorting, clearing and disposing of things, as well as keeping some sentimental items for yourself as you were close to your dad. 

    But, get it in writing, and take photos of anything you keep for yourself, because in my experience, as soon as there's a sniff of potential inheritance, people come out of the woodwork demanding their share. Any proceeds after sorting and selling the contents should be noted and become part of the estate. Expenses of executors are allowed, so keep notes of your time and things like petrol, postage, obtaing certificates etc, and get reimbursed when the estate is settled.
  • RL11
    RL11 Posts: 250 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper
    If you trust and love your siblings, where's the dilemma?
    I'm going through this right now. We all got to pick anything we wanted to keep (including jewellery) and there was no discussion or arguments over whether anything chosen was valuable or not. Everything else will be sold, off to the charity shops or dumped. Proceeds will be shared in the unlikely event that there is unexpected value but otherwise it seems perfectly fair that whoever clears it can keep anything raised.
  • REJP
    REJP Posts: 325 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    I agree with all posters who say clarify things with your sibling, in that you might make money selling items that he wants junked.
    I have a lot of experience of the "out of the woodwork at the sniff of cash clients."  My feeling is if your sibling says dump everything but is not willing to help with the dumping, then he is not bothered about financial gain.  Why should he let you do all the work, and believe me, it can be very onerous, then benefit from the potential sales.?  A short "I (here put his name) agree that you (here put your name) do agree that as you are clearing the property at your own expense any money made as a result of selling items accrues to you as you did the work."  Get him to sign and date it before you clear it.
    also as mentioned by others, you are still going to have to pay council tax until the property is disposed of even if it takes ages to sell.  This also applies to insurance of the property.  Is he contributing to those items?
    get it in writing.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.6K Life & Family
  • 262K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.