Regular Savings Accounts: The Best Currently Available List!

SFindlay

fabsaver said:

SFindlay said:

georged123 said:

SFindlay said:

georged123 said:

SFindlay said:

TheWoodler said:

As PP have said MBS have woeful IT.

With the poor IT they are reliant on branch processing of application influxes which they don’t have the resources to deal with. I don’t know why they keep offering these products because these influxes lead to process errors.

I’d rather have efficient resources than cups of coffee with nice staff front of house. Their CS was out of their depth with an error *of their own making* with a previous RS issue in my case which they were ill-equipped to deal with. In my view, they should only operate locally with branch-based products confined to their heartland. Smaller societies seem to me to have made a more successful transition and offer better IT and CS than MBS have done. 

And I  (like most reasonable people) would rather have accounts paying 7-8% over one paying 4-5% but giving me a wonderful IT experience.!! Being able to instantly see your account online is of absolutely ZERO advantage to anyone, it doesn't earn you any extra interest.  

Why would anyone prefer societies to only offer branch based accounts to locals rather than wait a few days for a competitive account to be opened? Many accounts can only be opened by post yet there aren't people on here moaning about the length of time they take to open so would everyone prefer Monmouthshire didn't have any online application and do it all through postal or branch applications? All these complaints sound like sour grapes by those who are still waiting but let's be serious we are talking pennies of a difference!!

But all that aside if people stopped whinging for just a minute (though that seems to be the world we live in now) you might realise Monmouthshire are in the process of updating their IT system and are actively asking for people's experience and suggestions to improve how they operate so instead of complaining on forums maybe engage with Monmouthshire using their feedback and surveys to improve things in future.

Once they've spent a whack of money improving their IT so you can see your account balance instantly you can then come on and moan about their interest rates being poor as theyve spent all their money giving you an IT system that you don't consider woeful!!

I don't think it's much to ask for a bank or building society that handles millions of pounds of people's money in 2023 to have a decent standard of IT system, competent processes and clear communication with their customers. 

There's far too many posters on these threads that are over defensive of certain banks/building societies when people rightly criticise shoddy service and incompetence.

I'm not directly aiming this at you SFindlay but calling valid criticism/opinion as "whinging" and "sour grapes" is not needed.

A valid criticism is when an institution does not fulfil its statutory obligation or processes outlined in their documentation neither of which have the Monmouthshire failed on. Don't really see how you can claim shoddy service or incompetence considering the main issues people are complaining about.

At no time did Monmouthshire state accounts would be opened instantly or indeed even give an indication how long applications would take to process, people aren't depositing any money so how long it takes to open is irrelevant!! 

At no time did Monmouthshire say that they would email acknowledgement to people that applications were recieved and being processed, it did however say after application was completed that once processed they would be in touch. Numerous people have posted that they recieved email confirmation once their application had been processed so they have fulfilled their commitment. 

Monmouthshire policy is they want a completed signatory form before account will be fully opened and operational, that's their policy and if people don't like it don't apply. Those of us who have had numerous Monmouthshire accounts have no doubt sent back numerous signature forms but who cares, it takes 2 seconds to sign and then shove it in a prepaid envelope to put in a post box, hardly difficult to do.

Quite frankly if people don't like how an institution chooses to operate an account then simply don't apply but people seeing a headline rate but failing to read T&C or documentation surrounding account opening and operating procedures then moaning about them are simply whinging and have nobody to blame but themselves!!

There's been many posters on this thread who have said about the website crashing, customer service being poor, receiving contradictory information and not being sent the correct documents in order to complete the process. None of those issues were down to customers failing to read the T+Cs correctly and were solely down to Monmouthshire's incompetence.

Maybe I've missed the posts so happy for you to correct me and show me the posts.

At no point have I seen anyone saying website crashed??  There were reports online applications for certain products stopped for a while around 11AM (whilst alternative application form was uploaded) and then withdrawn for 7% saver from the Thursday but at no time did website crash. Institutions have the right to withdraw products at any time so fact they got enough applications for standard RS in a short time then withdrew it does not mean website crashed.

I didnt see anyone complaing about customer service, in fact quite the opposite. From what I've seen those people who elected to apply online and telephone customer services said the handlers were all very helpful. A couple of people struggled initially to get through but that's only expected when so many people phoned unnecessarily. Overall previous customers have always praised Monmouthshire CS and branch staff so don't know where you have seen anyone complaining about them?

Only posts regarding contradictory information was regarding if interest rate was fixed or variable but don't think it would have stopped anyone applying when unlimited penalty free withdrawals allowed. If anyone really bothered then the individual product T&C is the literature to rely on and would be used for any complaints so not really annissue.

With regards to not being sent correct documents the odd error happens with everyone. Regarding people with Exclusive RS saying they hadn't got a signature form to send back I think it's reasonable to pressume since it is a members only account they have decided not to bother requesting signatures, all these people got their passbooks so can presume their accounts are fully open and operational. Everyone opening the standard RS have said they did get signature form so not prevented from.completing the process.

None of that shows any incompetence, maybe people need to use a bit of common sense and think for themselves.

Anyway this is straying from discussing their Regular Savers which let's not forget are market leading products so people have to decide what's more important to them as nobody is being forced to open an account!! 

I posted yesterday about the letters I received from Monmouthshire.
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/80256263/#Comment_80256263

Maybe they have decided that not to bother requesting signatures for the members only Exclusive RS. However if that were the case they should not have requested return of the form in the covering letter. My letter for the Exclusive RS states:
"As you have applied online, please sign and return the enclosed 'Online Signatory Form' so we can get you up and running. Please note, you will not be able to transact on your account until we are in receipt of this"

We should not have to presume if our accounts are fully open and operational. Their communications should make that clear.

I think the fact you have recieved the passbook for the Exclusive RS and no signature form makes it pretty obvious the account is fully open and operational even more so since the non member RS did not have passbook but did have a signature request form enclosed. They probably thought they were doing members a favour and the fact most existing members probably have access online they can add new accounts to their online profile and make a deposit, or would you prefer to wait? 

simonsmithsays

SFindlay said:

fabsaver said:

SFindlay said:

georged123 said:

SFindlay said:

georged123 said:

SFindlay said:

TheWoodler said:

As PP have said MBS have woeful IT.

With the poor IT they are reliant on branch processing of application influxes which they don’t have the resources to deal with. I don’t know why they keep offering these products because these influxes lead to process errors.

I’d rather have efficient resources than cups of coffee with nice staff front of house. Their CS was out of their depth with an error *of their own making* with a previous RS issue in my case which they were ill-equipped to deal with. In my view, they should only operate locally with branch-based products confined to their heartland. Smaller societies seem to me to have made a more successful transition and offer better IT and CS than MBS have done. 

And I  (like most reasonable people) would rather have accounts paying 7-8% over one paying 4-5% but giving me a wonderful IT experience.!! Being able to instantly see your account online is of absolutely ZERO advantage to anyone, it doesn't earn you any extra interest.  

Why would anyone prefer societies to only offer branch based accounts to locals rather than wait a few days for a competitive account to be opened? Many accounts can only be opened by post yet there aren't people on here moaning about the length of time they take to open so would everyone prefer Monmouthshire didn't have any online application and do it all through postal or branch applications? All these complaints sound like sour grapes by those who are still waiting but let's be serious we are talking pennies of a difference!!

But all that aside if people stopped whinging for just a minute (though that seems to be the world we live in now) you might realise Monmouthshire are in the process of updating their IT system and are actively asking for people's experience and suggestions to improve how they operate so instead of complaining on forums maybe engage with Monmouthshire using their feedback and surveys to improve things in future.

Once they've spent a whack of money improving their IT so you can see your account balance instantly you can then come on and moan about their interest rates being poor as theyve spent all their money giving you an IT system that you don't consider woeful!!

I don't think it's much to ask for a bank or building society that handles millions of pounds of people's money in 2023 to have a decent standard of IT system, competent processes and clear communication with their customers. 

There's far too many posters on these threads that are over defensive of certain banks/building societies when people rightly criticise shoddy service and incompetence.

I'm not directly aiming this at you SFindlay but calling valid criticism/opinion as "whinging" and "sour grapes" is not needed.

A valid criticism is when an institution does not fulfil its statutory obligation or processes outlined in their documentation neither of which have the Monmouthshire failed on. Don't really see how you can claim shoddy service or incompetence considering the main issues people are complaining about.

At no time did Monmouthshire state accounts would be opened instantly or indeed even give an indication how long applications would take to process, people aren't depositing any money so how long it takes to open is irrelevant!! 

At no time did Monmouthshire say that they would email acknowledgement to people that applications were recieved and being processed, it did however say after application was completed that once processed they would be in touch. Numerous people have posted that they recieved email confirmation once their application had been processed so they have fulfilled their commitment. 

Monmouthshire policy is they want a completed signatory form before account will be fully opened and operational, that's their policy and if people don't like it don't apply. Those of us who have had numerous Monmouthshire accounts have no doubt sent back numerous signature forms but who cares, it takes 2 seconds to sign and then shove it in a prepaid envelope to put in a post box, hardly difficult to do.

Quite frankly if people don't like how an institution chooses to operate an account then simply don't apply but people seeing a headline rate but failing to read T&C or documentation surrounding account opening and operating procedures then moaning about them are simply whinging and have nobody to blame but themselves!!

There's been many posters on this thread who have said about the website crashing, customer service being poor, receiving contradictory information and not being sent the correct documents in order to complete the process. None of those issues were down to customers failing to read the T+Cs correctly and were solely down to Monmouthshire's incompetence.

Maybe I've missed the posts so happy for you to correct me and show me the posts.

At no point have I seen anyone saying website crashed??  There were reports online applications for certain products stopped for a while around 11AM (whilst alternative application form was uploaded) and then withdrawn for 7% saver from the Thursday but at no time did website crash. Institutions have the right to withdraw products at any time so fact they got enough applications for standard RS in a short time then withdrew it does not mean website crashed.

I didnt see anyone complaing about customer service, in fact quite the opposite. From what I've seen those people who elected to apply online and telephone customer services said the handlers were all very helpful. A couple of people struggled initially to get through but that's only expected when so many people phoned unnecessarily. Overall previous customers have always praised Monmouthshire CS and branch staff so don't know where you have seen anyone complaining about them?

Only posts regarding contradictory information was regarding if interest rate was fixed or variable but don't think it would have stopped anyone applying when unlimited penalty free withdrawals allowed. If anyone really bothered then the individual product T&C is the literature to rely on and would be used for any complaints so not really annissue.

With regards to not being sent correct documents the odd error happens with everyone. Regarding people with Exclusive RS saying they hadn't got a signature form to send back I think it's reasonable to pressume since it is a members only account they have decided not to bother requesting signatures, all these people got their passbooks so can presume their accounts are fully open and operational. Everyone opening the standard RS have said they did get signature form so not prevented from.completing the process.

None of that shows any incompetence, maybe people need to use a bit of common sense and think for themselves.

Anyway this is straying from discussing their Regular Savers which let's not forget are market leading products so people have to decide what's more important to them as nobody is being forced to open an account!! 

I posted yesterday about the letters I received from Monmouthshire.
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/80256263/#Comment_80256263

Maybe they have decided that not to bother requesting signatures for the members only Exclusive RS. However if that were the case they should not have requested return of the form in the covering letter. My letter for the Exclusive RS states:
"As you have applied online, please sign and return the enclosed 'Online Signatory Form' so we can get you up and running. Please note, you will not be able to transact on your account until we are in receipt of this"

We should not have to presume if our accounts are fully open and operational. Their communications should make that clear.

I think the fact you have recieved the passbook for the Exclusive RS and no signature form makes it pretty obvious the account is fully open and operational even more so since the non member RS did not have passbook but did have a signature request form enclosed. They probably thought they were doing members a favour and the fact most existing members probably have access online they can add new accounts to their online profile and make a deposit, or would you prefer to wait? 

And the fact the RS 2 correspondence says 'ACCOUNT NUMBER' and is in the same format as my other six accounts with them makes me comfortable enough to assume it's the final account number.

TheWoodler

May I just say, to those who suggested that I was merely whinging on a forum about MBS’ inefficiency, that I put in a complaint about *their* error which was fully justified and *upheld in full*. So I have addressed it directly with them and am entitled to speak as I have found. 

Whatever market-leading RS they had at the time was simply not worth the hassle that they put me through. 

That was my experience. YMMV. 

allegro120

DJDools said:

I have a Saffron BS Small Saver (Issue 7) that is earning a paltry 4% AER until Dec. I know they don't allow people to hold more than one regular saver/small saver, but if I were to close the one I have and open the one that's on offer now at 5.75%, would I still get the 4% paid to a/c closure?

My 'Small Saver issue 7' turned into 'Small Saver variable' a while ago. I didn't ask for it, it just happened when the rate has gone up.  I don't know why yours didn't change, I assumed that this happened automatically to all 'small saver' holders, not just to me.

PowerSavingMode

allegro120 said:

DJDools said:

I have a Saffron BS Small Saver (Issue 7) that is earning a paltry 4% AER until Dec. I know they don't allow people to hold more than one regular saver/small saver, but if I were to close the one I have and open the one that's on offer now at 5.75%, would I still get the 4% paid to a/c closure?

My 'Small Saver issue 7' turned into 'Small Saver variable' a while ago. I didn't ask for it, it just happened when the rate has gone up.  I don't know why yours didn't change, I assumed that this happened automatically to all 'small saver' holders, not just to me.

That's interesting. 

Mine is also the Small Saver Issue 7 (Fixed Term), but they didn't change mine. It's still showing at 4%. Needless to say, I have used the withdrawal access to take out all but £1. No point keeping more in at 4%, but bit miffed they won't allow me to open the Saver at 5.75%. 

ForumUser7

DJDools said:

allegro120 said:

DJDools said:

I have a Saffron BS Small Saver (Issue 7) that is earning a paltry 4% AER until Dec. I know they don't allow people to hold more than one regular saver/small saver, but if I were to close the one I have and open the one that's on offer now at 5.75%, would I still get the 4% paid to a/c closure?

My 'Small Saver issue 7' turned into 'Small Saver variable' a while ago. I didn't ask for it, it just happened when the rate has gone up.  I don't know why yours didn't change, I assumed that this happened automatically to all 'small saver' holders, not just to me.

That's interesting. 

Mine is also the Small Saver Issue 7 (Fixed Term), but they didn't change mine. It's still showing at 4%. Needless to say, I have used the withdrawal access to take out all but £1. No point keeping more in at 4%, but bit miffed they won't allow me to open the Saver at 5.75%. 

They will, call them and ask to convert the account.

Bridlington1

DJDools said:

allegro120 said:

DJDools said:

I have a Saffron BS Small Saver (Issue 7) that is earning a paltry 4% AER until Dec. I know they don't allow people to hold more than one regular saver/small saver, but if I were to close the one I have and open the one that's on offer now at 5.75%, would I still get the 4% paid to a/c closure?

My 'Small Saver issue 7' turned into 'Small Saver variable' a while ago. I didn't ask for it, it just happened when the rate has gone up.  I don't know why yours didn't change, I assumed that this happened automatically to all 'small saver' holders, not just to me.

That's interesting. 

Mine is also the Small Saver Issue 7 (Fixed Term), but they didn't change mine. It's still showing at 4%. Needless to say, I have used the withdrawal access to take out all but £1. No point keeping more in at 4%, but bit miffed they won't allow me to open the Saver at 5.75%. 

They will allow you to get the 5.75% small saver though. The quickest and easiest way as I've already mentioned on Thursday is to send them a secure message or give them a ring and ask them to convert the account to the 5.75% version. They'll pay the interest you've already earned and the account will be restarted at 5.75%, sort code/account number will remain the same and the maturity date will be changed to being a year from account conversion.

fabsaver

SFindlay said:

fabsaver said:

SFindlay said:

georged123 said:

SFindlay said:

georged123 said:

SFindlay said:

TheWoodler said:

As PP have said MBS have woeful IT.

With the poor IT they are reliant on branch processing of application influxes which they don’t have the resources to deal with. I don’t know why they keep offering these products because these influxes lead to process errors.

I’d rather have efficient resources than cups of coffee with nice staff front of house. Their CS was out of their depth with an error *of their own making* with a previous RS issue in my case which they were ill-equipped to deal with. In my view, they should only operate locally with branch-based products confined to their heartland. Smaller societies seem to me to have made a more successful transition and offer better IT and CS than MBS have done. 

And I  (like most reasonable people) would rather have accounts paying 7-8% over one paying 4-5% but giving me a wonderful IT experience.!! Being able to instantly see your account online is of absolutely ZERO advantage to anyone, it doesn't earn you any extra interest.  

Why would anyone prefer societies to only offer branch based accounts to locals rather than wait a few days for a competitive account to be opened? Many accounts can only be opened by post yet there aren't people on here moaning about the length of time they take to open so would everyone prefer Monmouthshire didn't have any online application and do it all through postal or branch applications? All these complaints sound like sour grapes by those who are still waiting but let's be serious we are talking pennies of a difference!!

But all that aside if people stopped whinging for just a minute (though that seems to be the world we live in now) you might realise Monmouthshire are in the process of updating their IT system and are actively asking for people's experience and suggestions to improve how they operate so instead of complaining on forums maybe engage with Monmouthshire using their feedback and surveys to improve things in future.

Once they've spent a whack of money improving their IT so you can see your account balance instantly you can then come on and moan about their interest rates being poor as theyve spent all their money giving you an IT system that you don't consider woeful!!

I don't think it's much to ask for a bank or building society that handles millions of pounds of people's money in 2023 to have a decent standard of IT system, competent processes and clear communication with their customers. 

There's far too many posters on these threads that are over defensive of certain banks/building societies when people rightly criticise shoddy service and incompetence.

I'm not directly aiming this at you SFindlay but calling valid criticism/opinion as "whinging" and "sour grapes" is not needed.

A valid criticism is when an institution does not fulfil its statutory obligation or processes outlined in their documentation neither of which have the Monmouthshire failed on. Don't really see how you can claim shoddy service or incompetence considering the main issues people are complaining about.

At no time did Monmouthshire state accounts would be opened instantly or indeed even give an indication how long applications would take to process, people aren't depositing any money so how long it takes to open is irrelevant!! 

At no time did Monmouthshire say that they would email acknowledgement to people that applications were recieved and being processed, it did however say after application was completed that once processed they would be in touch. Numerous people have posted that they recieved email confirmation once their application had been processed so they have fulfilled their commitment. 

Monmouthshire policy is they want a completed signatory form before account will be fully opened and operational, that's their policy and if people don't like it don't apply. Those of us who have had numerous Monmouthshire accounts have no doubt sent back numerous signature forms but who cares, it takes 2 seconds to sign and then shove it in a prepaid envelope to put in a post box, hardly difficult to do.

Quite frankly if people don't like how an institution chooses to operate an account then simply don't apply but people seeing a headline rate but failing to read T&C or documentation surrounding account opening and operating procedures then moaning about them are simply whinging and have nobody to blame but themselves!!

There's been many posters on this thread who have said about the website crashing, customer service being poor, receiving contradictory information and not being sent the correct documents in order to complete the process. None of those issues were down to customers failing to read the T+Cs correctly and were solely down to Monmouthshire's incompetence.

Maybe I've missed the posts so happy for you to correct me and show me the posts.

At no point have I seen anyone saying website crashed??  There were reports online applications for certain products stopped for a while around 11AM (whilst alternative application form was uploaded) and then withdrawn for 7% saver from the Thursday but at no time did website crash. Institutions have the right to withdraw products at any time so fact they got enough applications for standard RS in a short time then withdrew it does not mean website crashed.

I didnt see anyone complaing about customer service, in fact quite the opposite. From what I've seen those people who elected to apply online and telephone customer services said the handlers were all very helpful. A couple of people struggled initially to get through but that's only expected when so many people phoned unnecessarily. Overall previous customers have always praised Monmouthshire CS and branch staff so don't know where you have seen anyone complaining about them?

Only posts regarding contradictory information was regarding if interest rate was fixed or variable but don't think it would have stopped anyone applying when unlimited penalty free withdrawals allowed. If anyone really bothered then the individual product T&C is the literature to rely on and would be used for any complaints so not really annissue.

With regards to not being sent correct documents the odd error happens with everyone. Regarding people with Exclusive RS saying they hadn't got a signature form to send back I think it's reasonable to pressume since it is a members only account they have decided not to bother requesting signatures, all these people got their passbooks so can presume their accounts are fully open and operational. Everyone opening the standard RS have said they did get signature form so not prevented from.completing the process.

None of that shows any incompetence, maybe people need to use a bit of common sense and think for themselves.

Anyway this is straying from discussing their Regular Savers which let's not forget are market leading products so people have to decide what's more important to them as nobody is being forced to open an account!! 

I posted yesterday about the letters I received from Monmouthshire.
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/80256263/#Comment_80256263

Maybe they have decided that not to bother requesting signatures for the members only Exclusive RS. However if that were the case they should not have requested return of the form in the covering letter. My letter for the Exclusive RS states:
"As you have applied online, please sign and return the enclosed 'Online Signatory Form' so we can get you up and running. Please note, you will not be able to transact on your account until we are in receipt of this"

We should not have to presume if our accounts are fully open and operational. Their communications should make that clear.

I think the fact you have recieved the passbook for the Exclusive RS and no signature form makes it pretty obvious the account is fully open and operational even more so since the non member RS did not have passbook but did have a signature request form enclosed. They probably thought they were doing members a favour and the fact most existing members probably have access online they can add new accounts to their online profile and make a deposit, or would you prefer to wait? 

It's certainly not obvious to me. If the letter says they need a signatory form then I accept that is their procedure. The fact that I am in possession of a passbook means nothing if the letter says I will be unable to transact on the account.

Am I supposed to have some sort of phrase book to translate what they say in their communications to what they actually mean?

Take for example that email many of us received:
"An account has been added to your Online Banking profile. Please log in to view the details"
Actually means "We've processed your application but we haven't added the account to your online banking profile. Please wait for a letter to arrive by snail mail then login to add the account to your online banking profile yourself. It will then show as pending for a few days until we may or may not eventually add the account"

It really is sloppy and poor communication by Monmouthshire IMO.

kaMelo

fabsaver said:

SFindlay said:

fabsaver said:

SFindlay said:

georged123 said:

SFindlay said:

georged123 said:

SFindlay said:

TheWoodler said:

As PP have said MBS have woeful IT.

With the poor IT they are reliant on branch processing of application influxes which they don’t have the resources to deal with. I don’t know why they keep offering these products because these influxes lead to process errors.

I’d rather have efficient resources than cups of coffee with nice staff front of house. Their CS was out of their depth with an error *of their own making* with a previous RS issue in my case which they were ill-equipped to deal with. In my view, they should only operate locally with branch-based products confined to their heartland. Smaller societies seem to me to have made a more successful transition and offer better IT and CS than MBS have done. 

And I  (like most reasonable people) would rather have accounts paying 7-8% over one paying 4-5% but giving me a wonderful IT experience.!! Being able to instantly see your account online is of absolutely ZERO advantage to anyone, it doesn't earn you any extra interest.  

Why would anyone prefer societies to only offer branch based accounts to locals rather than wait a few days for a competitive account to be opened? Many accounts can only be opened by post yet there aren't people on here moaning about the length of time they take to open so would everyone prefer Monmouthshire didn't have any online application and do it all through postal or branch applications? All these complaints sound like sour grapes by those who are still waiting but let's be serious we are talking pennies of a difference!!

But all that aside if people stopped whinging for just a minute (though that seems to be the world we live in now) you might realise Monmouthshire are in the process of updating their IT system and are actively asking for people's experience and suggestions to improve how they operate so instead of complaining on forums maybe engage with Monmouthshire using their feedback and surveys to improve things in future.

Once they've spent a whack of money improving their IT so you can see your account balance instantly you can then come on and moan about their interest rates being poor as theyve spent all their money giving you an IT system that you don't consider woeful!!

I don't think it's much to ask for a bank or building society that handles millions of pounds of people's money in 2023 to have a decent standard of IT system, competent processes and clear communication with their customers. 

There's far too many posters on these threads that are over defensive of certain banks/building societies when people rightly criticise shoddy service and incompetence.

I'm not directly aiming this at you SFindlay but calling valid criticism/opinion as "whinging" and "sour grapes" is not needed.

A valid criticism is when an institution does not fulfil its statutory obligation or processes outlined in their documentation neither of which have the Monmouthshire failed on. Don't really see how you can claim shoddy service or incompetence considering the main issues people are complaining about.

At no time did Monmouthshire state accounts would be opened instantly or indeed even give an indication how long applications would take to process, people aren't depositing any money so how long it takes to open is irrelevant!! 

At no time did Monmouthshire say that they would email acknowledgement to people that applications were recieved and being processed, it did however say after application was completed that once processed they would be in touch. Numerous people have posted that they recieved email confirmation once their application had been processed so they have fulfilled their commitment. 

Monmouthshire policy is they want a completed signatory form before account will be fully opened and operational, that's their policy and if people don't like it don't apply. Those of us who have had numerous Monmouthshire accounts have no doubt sent back numerous signature forms but who cares, it takes 2 seconds to sign and then shove it in a prepaid envelope to put in a post box, hardly difficult to do.

Quite frankly if people don't like how an institution chooses to operate an account then simply don't apply but people seeing a headline rate but failing to read T&C or documentation surrounding account opening and operating procedures then moaning about them are simply whinging and have nobody to blame but themselves!!

There's been many posters on this thread who have said about the website crashing, customer service being poor, receiving contradictory information and not being sent the correct documents in order to complete the process. None of those issues were down to customers failing to read the T+Cs correctly and were solely down to Monmouthshire's incompetence.

Maybe I've missed the posts so happy for you to correct me and show me the posts.

At no point have I seen anyone saying website crashed??  There were reports online applications for certain products stopped for a while around 11AM (whilst alternative application form was uploaded) and then withdrawn for 7% saver from the Thursday but at no time did website crash. Institutions have the right to withdraw products at any time so fact they got enough applications for standard RS in a short time then withdrew it does not mean website crashed.

I didnt see anyone complaing about customer service, in fact quite the opposite. From what I've seen those people who elected to apply online and telephone customer services said the handlers were all very helpful. A couple of people struggled initially to get through but that's only expected when so many people phoned unnecessarily. Overall previous customers have always praised Monmouthshire CS and branch staff so don't know where you have seen anyone complaining about them?

Only posts regarding contradictory information was regarding if interest rate was fixed or variable but don't think it would have stopped anyone applying when unlimited penalty free withdrawals allowed. If anyone really bothered then the individual product T&C is the literature to rely on and would be used for any complaints so not really annissue.

With regards to not being sent correct documents the odd error happens with everyone. Regarding people with Exclusive RS saying they hadn't got a signature form to send back I think it's reasonable to pressume since it is a members only account they have decided not to bother requesting signatures, all these people got their passbooks so can presume their accounts are fully open and operational. Everyone opening the standard RS have said they did get signature form so not prevented from.completing the process.

None of that shows any incompetence, maybe people need to use a bit of common sense and think for themselves.

Anyway this is straying from discussing their Regular Savers which let's not forget are market leading products so people have to decide what's more important to them as nobody is being forced to open an account!! 

I posted yesterday about the letters I received from Monmouthshire.
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/80256263/#Comment_80256263

Maybe they have decided that not to bother requesting signatures for the members only Exclusive RS. However if that were the case they should not have requested return of the form in the covering letter. My letter for the Exclusive RS states:
"As you have applied online, please sign and return the enclosed 'Online Signatory Form' so we can get you up and running. Please note, you will not be able to transact on your account until we are in receipt of this"

We should not have to presume if our accounts are fully open and operational. Their communications should make that clear.

I think the fact you have recieved the passbook for the Exclusive RS and no signature form makes it pretty obvious the account is fully open and operational even more so since the non member RS did not have passbook but did have a signature request form enclosed. They probably thought they were doing members a favour and the fact most existing members probably have access online they can add new accounts to their online profile and make a deposit, or would you prefer to wait? 

It's certainly not obvious to me. If the letter says they need a signatory form then I accept that is their procedure. The fact that I am in possession of a passbook means nothing if the letter says I will be unable to transact on the account.

Am I supposed to have some sort of phrase book to translate what they say in their communications to what they actually mean?

Take for example that email many of us received:
"An account has been added to your Online Banking profile. Please log in to view the details"
Actually means "We've processed your application but we haven't added the account to your online banking profile. Please wait for a letter to arrive by snail mail then login to add the account to your online banking profile yourself. It will then show as pending for a few days until we may or may not eventually add the account"

It really is sloppy and poor communication by Monmouthshire IMO.

Apart from the very first account I opened with them that is how it's always worked. Receive a welcome letter with an account number, log in and click "add account" then enter the account number. A day or two later the account will appear in online banking. I agree it's a little clunky but it's always been like that, the new part is sending emails, that never used to happen. The first communication you used to receive was a welcome letter, signature request form and return envelope.

 I'm not saying it couldn't be better, it definitely could, Saffron BS is a good example of a small BS with a pretty slick operation but I'm not going to condemn them for their quirks. I opened both MonBS regular savers and as of yet, have received diddly squat back but I've been here before and know their timetables. I didn't expect anything until September, if it comes before that then great but if not then I'll have twelve months from September rather than August. I really don't understand why some people are getting all heated up over it.

 The only thing I would question is the lack of signature request form. I've had to send one of these back for every account I've ever opened with MonBS, which would suggest it's more of an oversight on their part not to send you one.

friolento

kaMelo said:

fabsaver said:

SFindlay said:

fabsaver said:

SFindlay said:

georged123 said:

SFindlay said:

georged123 said:

SFindlay said:

TheWoodler said:

As PP have said MBS have woeful IT.

With the poor IT they are reliant on branch processing of application influxes which they don’t have the resources to deal with. I don’t know why they keep offering these products because these influxes lead to process errors.

I’d rather have efficient resources than cups of coffee with nice staff front of house. Their CS was out of their depth with an error *of their own making* with a previous RS issue in my case which they were ill-equipped to deal with. In my view, they should only operate locally with branch-based products confined to their heartland. Smaller societies seem to me to have made a more successful transition and offer better IT and CS than MBS have done. 

And I  (like most reasonable people) would rather have accounts paying 7-8% over one paying 4-5% but giving me a wonderful IT experience.!! Being able to instantly see your account online is of absolutely ZERO advantage to anyone, it doesn't earn you any extra interest.  

Why would anyone prefer societies to only offer branch based accounts to locals rather than wait a few days for a competitive account to be opened? Many accounts can only be opened by post yet there aren't people on here moaning about the length of time they take to open so would everyone prefer Monmouthshire didn't have any online application and do it all through postal or branch applications? All these complaints sound like sour grapes by those who are still waiting but let's be serious we are talking pennies of a difference!!

But all that aside if people stopped whinging for just a minute (though that seems to be the world we live in now) you might realise Monmouthshire are in the process of updating their IT system and are actively asking for people's experience and suggestions to improve how they operate so instead of complaining on forums maybe engage with Monmouthshire using their feedback and surveys to improve things in future.

Once they've spent a whack of money improving their IT so you can see your account balance instantly you can then come on and moan about their interest rates being poor as theyve spent all their money giving you an IT system that you don't consider woeful!!

I don't think it's much to ask for a bank or building society that handles millions of pounds of people's money in 2023 to have a decent standard of IT system, competent processes and clear communication with their customers. 

There's far too many posters on these threads that are over defensive of certain banks/building societies when people rightly criticise shoddy service and incompetence.

I'm not directly aiming this at you SFindlay but calling valid criticism/opinion as "whinging" and "sour grapes" is not needed.

A valid criticism is when an institution does not fulfil its statutory obligation or processes outlined in their documentation neither of which have the Monmouthshire failed on. Don't really see how you can claim shoddy service or incompetence considering the main issues people are complaining about.

At no time did Monmouthshire state accounts would be opened instantly or indeed even give an indication how long applications would take to process, people aren't depositing any money so how long it takes to open is irrelevant!! 

At no time did Monmouthshire say that they would email acknowledgement to people that applications were recieved and being processed, it did however say after application was completed that once processed they would be in touch. Numerous people have posted that they recieved email confirmation once their application had been processed so they have fulfilled their commitment. 

Monmouthshire policy is they want a completed signatory form before account will be fully opened and operational, that's their policy and if people don't like it don't apply. Those of us who have had numerous Monmouthshire accounts have no doubt sent back numerous signature forms but who cares, it takes 2 seconds to sign and then shove it in a prepaid envelope to put in a post box, hardly difficult to do.

Quite frankly if people don't like how an institution chooses to operate an account then simply don't apply but people seeing a headline rate but failing to read T&C or documentation surrounding account opening and operating procedures then moaning about them are simply whinging and have nobody to blame but themselves!!

There's been many posters on this thread who have said about the website crashing, customer service being poor, receiving contradictory information and not being sent the correct documents in order to complete the process. None of those issues were down to customers failing to read the T+Cs correctly and were solely down to Monmouthshire's incompetence.

Maybe I've missed the posts so happy for you to correct me and show me the posts.

At no point have I seen anyone saying website crashed??  There were reports online applications for certain products stopped for a while around 11AM (whilst alternative application form was uploaded) and then withdrawn for 7% saver from the Thursday but at no time did website crash. Institutions have the right to withdraw products at any time so fact they got enough applications for standard RS in a short time then withdrew it does not mean website crashed.

I didnt see anyone complaing about customer service, in fact quite the opposite. From what I've seen those people who elected to apply online and telephone customer services said the handlers were all very helpful. A couple of people struggled initially to get through but that's only expected when so many people phoned unnecessarily. Overall previous customers have always praised Monmouthshire CS and branch staff so don't know where you have seen anyone complaining about them?

Only posts regarding contradictory information was regarding if interest rate was fixed or variable but don't think it would have stopped anyone applying when unlimited penalty free withdrawals allowed. If anyone really bothered then the individual product T&C is the literature to rely on and would be used for any complaints so not really annissue.

With regards to not being sent correct documents the odd error happens with everyone. Regarding people with Exclusive RS saying they hadn't got a signature form to send back I think it's reasonable to pressume since it is a members only account they have decided not to bother requesting signatures, all these people got their passbooks so can presume their accounts are fully open and operational. Everyone opening the standard RS have said they did get signature form so not prevented from.completing the process.

None of that shows any incompetence, maybe people need to use a bit of common sense and think for themselves.

Anyway this is straying from discussing their Regular Savers which let's not forget are market leading products so people have to decide what's more important to them as nobody is being forced to open an account!! 

I posted yesterday about the letters I received from Monmouthshire.
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/80256263/#Comment_80256263

Maybe they have decided that not to bother requesting signatures for the members only Exclusive RS. However if that were the case they should not have requested return of the form in the covering letter. My letter for the Exclusive RS states:
"As you have applied online, please sign and return the enclosed 'Online Signatory Form' so we can get you up and running. Please note, you will not be able to transact on your account until we are in receipt of this"

We should not have to presume if our accounts are fully open and operational. Their communications should make that clear.

I think the fact you have recieved the passbook for the Exclusive RS and no signature form makes it pretty obvious the account is fully open and operational even more so since the non member RS did not have passbook but did have a signature request form enclosed. They probably thought they were doing members a favour and the fact most existing members probably have access online they can add new accounts to their online profile and make a deposit, or would you prefer to wait? 

It's certainly not obvious to me. If the letter says they need a signatory form then I accept that is their procedure. The fact that I am in possession of a passbook means nothing if the letter says I will be unable to transact on the account.

Am I supposed to have some sort of phrase book to translate what they say in their communications to what they actually mean?

Take for example that email many of us received:
"An account has been added to your Online Banking profile. Please log in to view the details"
Actually means "We've processed your application but we haven't added the account to your online banking profile. Please wait for a letter to arrive by snail mail then login to add the account to your online banking profile yourself. It will then show as pending for a few days until we may or may not eventually add the account"

It really is sloppy and poor communication by Monmouthshire IMO.

Apart from the very first account I opened with them that is how it's always worked. Receive a welcome letter with an account number, log in and click "add account" then enter the account number. A day or two later the account will appear in online banking. I agree it's a little clunky but it's always been like that, the new part is sending emails, that never used to happen. The first communication you used to receive was a welcome letter, signature request form and return envelope.

True to the confusing MBS processes, the email-bit seems to only happen sporadically. Perhaps they turn it off for applications on non-working days? At least some people who applied yesterday got no email confirmation. My own applications last Wednesday also produced no emails.