We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Regular Savings Accounts: The Best Currently Available List!
Comments
-
Can somebody just in simple terms expalin why everyone jumps at the reg savers with often just small pay in amounts, even at as high of 7% rates? Why have many 10+ on the go at the same time. Makes even less sense to me if you can't drip feed. Is it not just a lot easier to put the lump sum in a 1y fix instead while the rates are still attractive?
E.g., drip feed from 2.81% Al Ryan to Monmouthshire 5.5% with 200 monthly payments only makes it a 4.25% rate. I can better put that in a 1y fix straight away e.g. 4.35% Atom and still make more but without all the fuss. Plus, I can select monthly interest and I can spread my gains over two tax years to utilise the PSA as much as possible.
I might be totally wrong and miss the point of why reg savers seem to excite everyone so much.0 -
pecunianonolet said:Can somebody just in simple terms expalin why everyone jumps at the reg savers with often just small pay in amounts, even at as high of 7% rates? Why have many 10+ on the go at the same time. Makes even less sense to me if you can't drip feed. Is it not just a lot easier to put the lump sum in a 1y fix instead while the rates are still attractive?
E.g., drip feed from 2.81% Al Ryan to Monmouthshire 5.5% with 200 monthly payments only makes it a 4.25% rate. I can better put that in a 1y fix straight away e.g. 4.35% Atom and still make more but without all the fuss. Plus, I can select monthly interest and I can spread my gains over two tax years to utilise the PSA as much as possible.
I might be totally wrong and miss the point of why reg savers seem to excite everyone so much.3 -
People don't necessarily have a lump sum ready to put somewhere all in one go either, so Regular Savers allow people to put excess money from their monthly pay (for example) into a Regular Saver each month.1
-
pecunianonolet said:Can somebody just in simple terms expalin why everyone jumps at the reg savers with often just small pay in amounts, even at as high of 7% rates? Why have many 10+ on the go at the same time. Makes even less sense to me if you can't drip feed. Is it not just a lot easier to put the lump sum in a 1y fix instead while the rates are still attractive?
E.g., drip feed from 2.81% Al Ryan to Monmouthshire 5.5% with 200 monthly payments only makes it a 4.25% rate. I can better put that in a 1y fix straight away e.g. 4.35% Atom and still make more but without all the fuss. Plus, I can select monthly interest and I can spread my gains over two tax years to utilise the PSA as much as possible.
I might be totally wrong and miss the point of why reg savers seem to excite everyone so much.
My 3 year 4.4% YBS ISA costs 180 days interest £220 on 10k
FD regular saver spare cash, Al Rayan easy access, Chase funds FD the day before so keeps the 2.1%
each month until moved.0 -
Band7 said:0
-
pecunianonolet said:Band7 said:If you want me to definitely see your reply, please tag me @forumuser7 Thank you.
N.B. (Amended from Forum Rules): You must investigate, and check several times, before you make any decisions or take any action based on any information you glean from any of my content, as nothing I post is advice, rather it is personal opinion and is solely for discussion purposes. I research before my posts, and I never intend to share anything that is misleading, misinforming, or out of date, but don't rely on everything you read. Some of the information changes quickly, is my own opinion or may be incorrect. Verify anything you read before acting on it to protect yourself because you are responsible for any action you consequently make... DYOR, YMMV etc.3 -
pecunianonolet said:Band7 said:1
-
pecunianonolet said:Can somebody just in simple terms expalin why everyone jumps at the reg savers with often just small pay in amounts, even at as high of 7% rates? Why have many 10+ on the go at the same time. Makes even less sense to me if you can't drip feed. Is it not just a lot easier to put the lump sum in a 1y fix instead while the rates are still attractive?
E.g., drip feed from 2.81% Al Ryan to Monmouthshire 5.5% with 200 monthly payments only makes it a 4.25% rate. I can better put that in a 1y fix straight away e.g. 4.35% Atom and still make more but without all the fuss. Plus, I can select monthly interest and I can spread my gains over two tax years to utilise the PSA as much as possible.
I might be totally wrong and miss the point of why reg savers seem to excite everyone so much.
Or (b) place the £1000 per month in one or more (if minimum deposit < £1k) 1 year fixed rate account(s) paying c.4.3% monthly interest at the moment. This would give you c.£3.58 per month for each fixed rate account that was active at the time. [If not paid away, c.£3.58 per month earned on an initial amount of £1000 compounds over 12 months to give c.£43.50 in total.]
Or (c) place the £1000 per month into two or more regular savers (assuming maximum monthly deposit of £500 or lower) paying 5% annual interest. [Higher interest rates than 5% are of course available with some regular savers at the moment.] Though you would have to wait for at least 12 months from opening each regular saver for interest to be paid, you would still be earning c.£4.17 per month (= £50 per year) for every £1000 deposited into these regular savers.
I hope the examples above are helpful.3 -
I just opened a HSBC Regular Saver. It was opened, funded and showed online immediately as did the monthly standing order.
HSBC have obviously worked on their back end systems. Opening a Global Money Account was equally as quick.
Its still showing as 1% though!2 -
cricidmuslibale said:pecunianonolet said:Can somebody just in simple terms expalin why everyone jumps at the reg savers with often just small pay in amounts, even at as high of 7% rates? Why have many 10+ on the go at the same time. Makes even less sense to me if you can't drip feed. Is it not just a lot easier to put the lump sum in a 1y fix instead while the rates are still attractive?
E.g., drip feed from 2.81% Al Ryan to Monmouthshire 5.5% with 200 monthly payments only makes it a 4.25% rate. I can better put that in a 1y fix straight away e.g. 4.35% Atom and still make more but without all the fuss. Plus, I can select monthly interest and I can spread my gains over two tax years to utilise the PSA as much as possible.
I might be totally wrong and miss the point of why reg savers seem to excite everyone so much.
Or (b) place the £1000 per month in one or more (if minimum deposit < £1k) 1 year fixed rate account(s) paying c.4.3% monthly interest at the moment. This would give you c.£3.58 per month for each fixed rate account that was active at the time. [If not paid away, c.£3.58 per month earned on an initial amount of £1000 compounds over 12 months to give c.£43.50 in total.]
Or (c) place the £1000 per month into two or more regular savers (assuming maximum monthly deposit of £500 or lower) paying 5% annual interest. [Higher interest rates than 5% are of course available with some regular savers at the moment.] Though you would have to wait for at least 12 months from opening each regular saver for interest to be paid, you would still be earning c.£4.17 per month (= £50 per year) for every £1000 deposited into these regular savers.
I hope the examples above are helpful.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards